Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings. / Varnum, Claus; Pedersen, Alma; Kjærsgaard-Andersen, Per; Overgaard, Søren.

I: Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition), Bind 86, Nr. 4, 01.08.2015, s. 477-484.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Varnum, C, Pedersen, A, Kjærsgaard-Andersen, P & Overgaard, S 2015, 'Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings', Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition), bind 86, nr. 4, s. 477-484. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975

APA

Varnum, C., Pedersen, A., Kjærsgaard-Andersen, P., & Overgaard, S. (2015). Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition), 86(4), 477-484. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975

Vancouver

Varnum C, Pedersen A, Kjærsgaard-Andersen P, Overgaard S. Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings. Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition). 2015 aug. 1;86(4):477-484. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975

Author

Varnum, Claus ; Pedersen, Alma ; Kjærsgaard-Andersen, Per ; Overgaard, Søren. / Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings. I: Acta Orthopaedica (Print Edition). 2015 ; Bind 86, Nr. 4. s. 477-484.

Bibtex

@article{6f9d7a2afccf4a02a8643e69cfd03e6e,
title = "Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings",
abstract = "Background and purpose-Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce problems related to polyethylene wear. We compared the 9-year revision risk for cementless CoC THA and for cementless metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA.Patients and methods-In this prospective, population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified all the primary cementless THAs that had been performed from 2002 through 2009 (n = 25,656). Of these, 1,773 THAs with CoC bearings and 9,323 THAs with MoP bearings were included in the study. To estimate the relative risk (RR) of revision, we used regression with the pseudo-value approach and treated death as a competing risk.Results-444 revisions were identified: 4.0% for CoC THA (71 of 1,773) and 4.0% for MoP THA (373 of 9,323). No statistically significant difference in the risk of revision for any reason was found for CoC and MoP bearings after 9 years of follow-up (adjusted RR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.72-2.4). Revision rates due to component failure were 0.5% (n = 8) for CoC bearings and 0.1% (n = 6) for MoP bearings (p < 0.001). 6 patients with CoC bearings (0.34%) underwent revision due to ceramic fracture.Interpretation-When compared to the {"}standard{"} MoP bearings, CoC THA had a 33% higher (though not statistically significantly higher) risk of revision for any reason at 9 years.",
author = "Claus Varnum and Alma Pedersen and Per Kj{\ae}rsgaard-Andersen and S{\o}ren Overgaard",
year = "2015",
month = aug,
day = "1",
doi = "10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "477--484",
journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the risk of revision in cementless total hip arthroplasty with ceramic-on-ceramic and metal-on-polyethylene bearings

AU - Varnum, Claus

AU - Pedersen, Alma

AU - Kjærsgaard-Andersen, Per

AU - Overgaard, Søren

PY - 2015/8/1

Y1 - 2015/8/1

N2 - Background and purpose-Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce problems related to polyethylene wear. We compared the 9-year revision risk for cementless CoC THA and for cementless metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA.Patients and methods-In this prospective, population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified all the primary cementless THAs that had been performed from 2002 through 2009 (n = 25,656). Of these, 1,773 THAs with CoC bearings and 9,323 THAs with MoP bearings were included in the study. To estimate the relative risk (RR) of revision, we used regression with the pseudo-value approach and treated death as a competing risk.Results-444 revisions were identified: 4.0% for CoC THA (71 of 1,773) and 4.0% for MoP THA (373 of 9,323). No statistically significant difference in the risk of revision for any reason was found for CoC and MoP bearings after 9 years of follow-up (adjusted RR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.72-2.4). Revision rates due to component failure were 0.5% (n = 8) for CoC bearings and 0.1% (n = 6) for MoP bearings (p < 0.001). 6 patients with CoC bearings (0.34%) underwent revision due to ceramic fracture.Interpretation-When compared to the "standard" MoP bearings, CoC THA had a 33% higher (though not statistically significantly higher) risk of revision for any reason at 9 years.

AB - Background and purpose-Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) bearings were introduced in total hip arthroplasty (THA) to reduce problems related to polyethylene wear. We compared the 9-year revision risk for cementless CoC THA and for cementless metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) THA.Patients and methods-In this prospective, population-based study from the Danish Hip Arthroplasty Registry, we identified all the primary cementless THAs that had been performed from 2002 through 2009 (n = 25,656). Of these, 1,773 THAs with CoC bearings and 9,323 THAs with MoP bearings were included in the study. To estimate the relative risk (RR) of revision, we used regression with the pseudo-value approach and treated death as a competing risk.Results-444 revisions were identified: 4.0% for CoC THA (71 of 1,773) and 4.0% for MoP THA (373 of 9,323). No statistically significant difference in the risk of revision for any reason was found for CoC and MoP bearings after 9 years of follow-up (adjusted RR = 1.3, 95% CI: 0.72-2.4). Revision rates due to component failure were 0.5% (n = 8) for CoC bearings and 0.1% (n = 6) for MoP bearings (p < 0.001). 6 patients with CoC bearings (0.34%) underwent revision due to ceramic fracture.Interpretation-When compared to the "standard" MoP bearings, CoC THA had a 33% higher (though not statistically significantly higher) risk of revision for any reason at 9 years.

U2 - 10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975

DO - 10.3109/17453674.2015.1012975

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25637339

VL - 86

SP - 477

EP - 484

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3674

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 252051508