Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods. / Kneser, Ulrich; Bigdeli, Amir K; Himmler, Joerg P; Eyüpoglu, Ilker Y; Ganslandt, Oliver; Hirsch, Almut; Schmidt, Volker J; Beier, Justus P; Horch, Raymund E.

I: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, Bind 68, Nr. 12, 12.2015, s. 1675-82.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Kneser, U, Bigdeli, AK, Himmler, JP, Eyüpoglu, IY, Ganslandt, O, Hirsch, A, Schmidt, VJ, Beier, JP & Horch, RE 2015, 'Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods', Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, bind 68, nr. 12, s. 1675-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.002

APA

Kneser, U., Bigdeli, A. K., Himmler, J. P., Eyüpoglu, I. Y., Ganslandt, O., Hirsch, A., Schmidt, V. J., Beier, J. P., & Horch, R. E. (2015). Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS, 68(12), 1675-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.002

Vancouver

Kneser U, Bigdeli AK, Himmler JP, Eyüpoglu IY, Ganslandt O, Hirsch A o.a. Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods. Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2015 dec.;68(12):1675-82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.002

Author

Kneser, Ulrich ; Bigdeli, Amir K ; Himmler, Joerg P ; Eyüpoglu, Ilker Y ; Ganslandt, Oliver ; Hirsch, Almut ; Schmidt, Volker J ; Beier, Justus P ; Horch, Raymund E. / Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods. I: Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS. 2015 ; Bind 68, Nr. 12. s. 1675-82.

Bibtex

@article{b36cf18fafa44e4a90f4ca5947012cde,
title = "Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: To compare the Ramirez technique for the operative closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with conventional closure techniques in newborns. We hypothesized that the immediate surgical treatment with the Ramirez technique is superior to prior used operative techniques.METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, 23 children (8 female, 15 male) underwent closure of large open myelomeningocele defects using the Ramirez technique (group A), while from 1993 to 2002, 23 children (6 female, 17 male) underwent conventional closure techniques (group B). All children were included in the retrospective analysis with a mean follow-up period of 3.4 years.RESULTS: Perioperative variables were similar in both groups (P = ns). There were no hospital deaths in both groups. The operation time was significantly higher in group A (228.7 ± 76.8 versus 157.8 ± 70.3 min, P = 0.003). Mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in group A (30.7 ± 16.4 days versus 52.0 ± 38.5; P = 0.02). Postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in group A (P = 0.01). Beyond postoperative day 10, liquor fluid leakage was significantly lower in group A (P = 0.05). During follow-up, there were no complications in group A. In group B, 2 children developed liquor fistulas.CONCLUSIONS: The Ramirez technique allows efficient and safe closure of large open myelomeningocele defects and reduces incidence of postoperative liquor fistulae. The increased operation time and surgical efforts seem to be justified. Treatment of large myelomeningocele defects requires an interdisciplinary team including paediatrician-neonatologists, neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons.",
keywords = "Female, Humans, Infant, Newborn, Male, Meningomyelocele/surgery, Neurosurgical Procedures/methods, Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods, Retrospective Studies, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Ulrich Kneser and Bigdeli, {Amir K} and Himmler, {Joerg P} and Ey{\"u}poglu, {Ilker Y} and Oliver Ganslandt and Almut Hirsch and Schmidt, {Volker J} and Beier, {Justus P} and Horch, {Raymund E}",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.",
year = "2015",
month = dec,
doi = "10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.002",
language = "English",
volume = "68",
pages = "1675--82",
journal = "Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS",
issn = "1748-6815",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "12",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of the Ramirez technique for the closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with alternative methods

AU - Kneser, Ulrich

AU - Bigdeli, Amir K

AU - Himmler, Joerg P

AU - Eyüpoglu, Ilker Y

AU - Ganslandt, Oliver

AU - Hirsch, Almut

AU - Schmidt, Volker J

AU - Beier, Justus P

AU - Horch, Raymund E

N1 - Copyright © 2015 British Association of Plastic, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

PY - 2015/12

Y1 - 2015/12

N2 - BACKGROUND: To compare the Ramirez technique for the operative closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with conventional closure techniques in newborns. We hypothesized that the immediate surgical treatment with the Ramirez technique is superior to prior used operative techniques.METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, 23 children (8 female, 15 male) underwent closure of large open myelomeningocele defects using the Ramirez technique (group A), while from 1993 to 2002, 23 children (6 female, 17 male) underwent conventional closure techniques (group B). All children were included in the retrospective analysis with a mean follow-up period of 3.4 years.RESULTS: Perioperative variables were similar in both groups (P = ns). There were no hospital deaths in both groups. The operation time was significantly higher in group A (228.7 ± 76.8 versus 157.8 ± 70.3 min, P = 0.003). Mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in group A (30.7 ± 16.4 days versus 52.0 ± 38.5; P = 0.02). Postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in group A (P = 0.01). Beyond postoperative day 10, liquor fluid leakage was significantly lower in group A (P = 0.05). During follow-up, there were no complications in group A. In group B, 2 children developed liquor fistulas.CONCLUSIONS: The Ramirez technique allows efficient and safe closure of large open myelomeningocele defects and reduces incidence of postoperative liquor fistulae. The increased operation time and surgical efforts seem to be justified. Treatment of large myelomeningocele defects requires an interdisciplinary team including paediatrician-neonatologists, neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons.

AB - BACKGROUND: To compare the Ramirez technique for the operative closure of large open myelomeningocele defects with conventional closure techniques in newborns. We hypothesized that the immediate surgical treatment with the Ramirez technique is superior to prior used operative techniques.METHODS: From 2003 to 2010, 23 children (8 female, 15 male) underwent closure of large open myelomeningocele defects using the Ramirez technique (group A), while from 1993 to 2002, 23 children (6 female, 17 male) underwent conventional closure techniques (group B). All children were included in the retrospective analysis with a mean follow-up period of 3.4 years.RESULTS: Perioperative variables were similar in both groups (P = ns). There were no hospital deaths in both groups. The operation time was significantly higher in group A (228.7 ± 76.8 versus 157.8 ± 70.3 min, P = 0.003). Mean length of hospital stay was significantly lower in group A (30.7 ± 16.4 days versus 52.0 ± 38.5; P = 0.02). Postoperative complication rate was significantly lower in group A (P = 0.01). Beyond postoperative day 10, liquor fluid leakage was significantly lower in group A (P = 0.05). During follow-up, there were no complications in group A. In group B, 2 children developed liquor fistulas.CONCLUSIONS: The Ramirez technique allows efficient and safe closure of large open myelomeningocele defects and reduces incidence of postoperative liquor fistulae. The increased operation time and surgical efforts seem to be justified. Treatment of large myelomeningocele defects requires an interdisciplinary team including paediatrician-neonatologists, neurosurgeons and plastic surgeons.

KW - Female

KW - Humans

KW - Infant, Newborn

KW - Male

KW - Meningomyelocele/surgery

KW - Neurosurgical Procedures/methods

KW - Plastic Surgery Procedures/methods

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.002

DO - 10.1016/j.bjps.2015.08.002

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 26439172

VL - 68

SP - 1675

EP - 1682

JO - Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS

JF - Journal of plastic, reconstructive & aesthetic surgery : JPRAS

SN - 1748-6815

IS - 12

ER -

ID: 329568030