Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy. / Eberhard, Kristine Elisabeth; Achiam, Michael Patrick; Rolff, Hans Christian; Belmouhand, Mohamed; Svendsen, Lars Bo; Thorsteinsson, Morten.

I: World Journal of Surgery, Bind 41, Nr. 6, 06.2017, s. 1575-1583.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Eberhard, KE, Achiam, MP, Rolff, HC, Belmouhand, M, Svendsen, LB & Thorsteinsson, M 2017, 'Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy', World Journal of Surgery, bind 41, nr. 6, s. 1575-1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3870-5

APA

Eberhard, K. E., Achiam, M. P., Rolff, H. C., Belmouhand, M., Svendsen, L. B., & Thorsteinsson, M. (2017). Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy. World Journal of Surgery, 41(6), 1575-1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3870-5

Vancouver

Eberhard KE, Achiam MP, Rolff HC, Belmouhand M, Svendsen LB, Thorsteinsson M. Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy. World Journal of Surgery. 2017 jun.;41(6):1575-1583. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-017-3870-5

Author

Eberhard, Kristine Elisabeth ; Achiam, Michael Patrick ; Rolff, Hans Christian ; Belmouhand, Mohamed ; Svendsen, Lars Bo ; Thorsteinsson, Morten. / Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy. I: World Journal of Surgery. 2017 ; Bind 41, Nr. 6. s. 1575-1583.

Bibtex

@article{90408dadd0fc42e9b6fd6802e8cf2204,
title = "Comparison of {"}Nil by Mouth{"} Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy",
abstract = "BACKGROUND: The literature on oral intake after esophagectomy and its influence on anastomotic leakage and complications is sparse.METHODS: This retrospective study included 359 patients undergoing esophagectomy between January 2011 and August 2015. Three oral intake protocols were evaluated: regimen 1, nil by mouth until postoperative day (POD) 7 followed by a normal diet; regimen 2, oral intake of clear fluids from POD 1 followed by a normal diet; regimen 3, nil by mouth until POD 7 followed by a slow increase to a blended diet. The outcome endpoints were: (1) anastomotic leakage, (2) complications [severity and number described using the Dindo-Clavien Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)] and (3) length of stay. A multivariate logistic regression model was obtained for CCI and anastomotic leakage using Wald's stepwise selection.RESULTS: CCI was significantly lower in regimen 3 (16 vs. 22 and 26 in regimen 1 and 2, p = 0.027). Additionally, significantly fewer patients in regimen 3 suffered from severe complications of Dindo-Clavien grade IIIb-IV (p = 0.025). The incidence of anastomotic leakage reached its lowest in regimen 3, 2%, compared to 7-9%. Multivariate analyses revealed that high American Society of Anesthesiologist score was a predicting factor for both CCI and anastomotic leakage.CONCLUSION: The study indicates that nil by mouth until postoperative day 7 followed by a slow increase to a blended diet after esophagectomy results in less severe complications and a tendency of fewer anastomotic leakages. Multiple comorbidities proved to be an important predictive factor of the postoperative course.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Eberhard, {Kristine Elisabeth} and Achiam, {Michael Patrick} and Rolff, {Hans Christian} and Mohamed Belmouhand and Svendsen, {Lars Bo} and Morten Thorsteinsson",
year = "2017",
month = jun,
doi = "10.1007/s00268-017-3870-5",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "1575--1583",
journal = "World Journal of Surgery",
issn = "0364-2313",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of "Nil by Mouth" Versus Early Oral Intake in Three Different Diet Regimens Following Esophagectomy

AU - Eberhard, Kristine Elisabeth

AU - Achiam, Michael Patrick

AU - Rolff, Hans Christian

AU - Belmouhand, Mohamed

AU - Svendsen, Lars Bo

AU - Thorsteinsson, Morten

PY - 2017/6

Y1 - 2017/6

N2 - BACKGROUND: The literature on oral intake after esophagectomy and its influence on anastomotic leakage and complications is sparse.METHODS: This retrospective study included 359 patients undergoing esophagectomy between January 2011 and August 2015. Three oral intake protocols were evaluated: regimen 1, nil by mouth until postoperative day (POD) 7 followed by a normal diet; regimen 2, oral intake of clear fluids from POD 1 followed by a normal diet; regimen 3, nil by mouth until POD 7 followed by a slow increase to a blended diet. The outcome endpoints were: (1) anastomotic leakage, (2) complications [severity and number described using the Dindo-Clavien Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)] and (3) length of stay. A multivariate logistic regression model was obtained for CCI and anastomotic leakage using Wald's stepwise selection.RESULTS: CCI was significantly lower in regimen 3 (16 vs. 22 and 26 in regimen 1 and 2, p = 0.027). Additionally, significantly fewer patients in regimen 3 suffered from severe complications of Dindo-Clavien grade IIIb-IV (p = 0.025). The incidence of anastomotic leakage reached its lowest in regimen 3, 2%, compared to 7-9%. Multivariate analyses revealed that high American Society of Anesthesiologist score was a predicting factor for both CCI and anastomotic leakage.CONCLUSION: The study indicates that nil by mouth until postoperative day 7 followed by a slow increase to a blended diet after esophagectomy results in less severe complications and a tendency of fewer anastomotic leakages. Multiple comorbidities proved to be an important predictive factor of the postoperative course.

AB - BACKGROUND: The literature on oral intake after esophagectomy and its influence on anastomotic leakage and complications is sparse.METHODS: This retrospective study included 359 patients undergoing esophagectomy between January 2011 and August 2015. Three oral intake protocols were evaluated: regimen 1, nil by mouth until postoperative day (POD) 7 followed by a normal diet; regimen 2, oral intake of clear fluids from POD 1 followed by a normal diet; regimen 3, nil by mouth until POD 7 followed by a slow increase to a blended diet. The outcome endpoints were: (1) anastomotic leakage, (2) complications [severity and number described using the Dindo-Clavien Classification and Comprehensive Complication Index (CCI)] and (3) length of stay. A multivariate logistic regression model was obtained for CCI and anastomotic leakage using Wald's stepwise selection.RESULTS: CCI was significantly lower in regimen 3 (16 vs. 22 and 26 in regimen 1 and 2, p = 0.027). Additionally, significantly fewer patients in regimen 3 suffered from severe complications of Dindo-Clavien grade IIIb-IV (p = 0.025). The incidence of anastomotic leakage reached its lowest in regimen 3, 2%, compared to 7-9%. Multivariate analyses revealed that high American Society of Anesthesiologist score was a predicting factor for both CCI and anastomotic leakage.CONCLUSION: The study indicates that nil by mouth until postoperative day 7 followed by a slow increase to a blended diet after esophagectomy results in less severe complications and a tendency of fewer anastomotic leakages. Multiple comorbidities proved to be an important predictive factor of the postoperative course.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00268-017-3870-5

DO - 10.1007/s00268-017-3870-5

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 28078353

VL - 41

SP - 1575

EP - 1583

JO - World Journal of Surgery

JF - World Journal of Surgery

SN - 0364-2313

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 186908687