Comparative Efficacy of Targeted Systemic Therapies for Moderate to Severe Atopic Dermatitis without Topical Corticosteroids: Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Dokumenter

  • Fulltext

    Forlagets udgivne version, 648 KB, PDF-dokument

  • Jonathan I. Silverberg
  • H. Chih ho Hong
  • Thyssen, Jacob Pontoppidan
  • Brian M. Calimlim
  • Avani Joshi
  • Henrique D. Teixeira
  • Eric B. Collins
  • Marjorie M. Crowell
  • Scott J. Johnson
  • April W. Armstrong

Introduction: The comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies for moderate to severe atopic dermatitis (AD) has not been systematically assessed using recent phase 3 data. This network meta-analysis assesses the comparative efficacy of targeted systemic therapies without the addition of topical corticosteroids (TCS) and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors (TCI) in adults with moderate to severe AD. Methods: The systematic literature review searched through 17 May 2021 for phase 3/4 trials with upadacitinib, interleukin-4 (IL-4), interleukin-13 (IL-13), or JAK inhibitors compared with placebo or active intervention for adults and adolescents with moderate to severe AD with inadequate response to TCS/TCI or for whom TCS/TCI was medically inadvisable, without restrictions on year or region. Researchers assessed data using PRISMA guidelines. The proportion of patients achieving trial co-primary endpoints [Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) score of 0 or 1 (clear or almost clear) and reduction of ≥ 2 points from baseline; proportion of patients achieving Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI) improvement ≥ 75% from baseline (EASI-75)]; EASI improvement ≥ 90% from baseline (EASI-90); and ≥ 4-point improvement on Pruritus Numerical Rating Scale from baseline (ΔNRS ≥ 4) were evaluated using Bayesian network meta-analysis. Results: Of 3415 initially identified records, network meta-analysis (NMA) ultimately included 6 records representing 9 unique studies. Two upadacitinib trials were also included. Eleven clinical trials including 6254 patients were analyzed. Upadacitinib 30 mg daily was the most efficacious therapy across all endpoints at the primary endpoint (week 12 or 16) and at earlier timepoints, followed by upadacitinib 15 mg daily and abrocitinib 200 mg daily. Discussion: Many factors need to be considered for treatment selection for AD. These findings can help healthcare providers when personalizing a patient’s treatment. Conclusion: Upadacitinib 30 mg daily, upadacitinib 15 mg daily, and abrocitinib 200 mg daily may be the most efficacious targeted systemic therapies over 12–16 weeks of therapy in AD.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDermatology and Therapy
Vol/bind12
Udgave nummer5
Sider (fra-til)1181-1196
Antal sider16
ISSN2193-8210
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 2022

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Medical writing support was provided by Marric Buessing, PhD, Medicus Economics LLC, Boston, MA, United States; this support was funded by AbbVie. Systematic literature review was provided by Kimberley Maxwell, Georghia Michael, Manpreet Sambi, Helen Baldwin, Fiona Robinson, Robin Marwick, Diana Petrina and Sabrina Smith; this support was funded by AbbVie.

Funding Information:
April W. Armstrong reported receiving grants and personal fees from AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Leo Pharma, and Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corp; personal fees from Boehringer Ingelheim/Parexel, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Dermavant, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc, Merck, Modernizing Medicine, Ortho Dermatologics, Pfizer Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Sanofi Genzyme, Science 37 Inc, Genentech, GlaxoSmithKline, and Valeant; and grants from Dermira, Janssen-Ortho Inc, Kyowa Hakko Kirin, and UCB Pharma outside the submitted work.

Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s).

ID: 313876608