Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types. / Lambrecht, Bastian; Simon, Jonatan; Bach, Bo.

I: Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment, 2024.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Lambrecht, B, Simon, J & Bach, B 2024, 'Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types', Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000646

APA

Lambrecht, B., Simon, J., & Bach, B. (2024). Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000646

Vancouver

Lambrecht B, Simon J, Bach B. Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types. Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1037/per0000646

Author

Lambrecht, Bastian ; Simon, Jonatan ; Bach, Bo. / Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types. I: Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment. 2024.

Bibtex

@article{d65ebac5131d4ed986df4bf7e9168b5f,
title = "Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types",
abstract = "The International Classification of Diseases (11th edition; ICD-11) has adopted a classification of personality disorders (PDs) that abolishes the established International Classification of Diseases (10th edition; ICD-10) PD types in favor of global severity and stylistic trait domain specifiers. The goal of the current study was to describe the empirical relationship between traditional PD types and the ICD-11 trait domains, which is anticipated to inform and guide clinicians in this profound transition. A total of 246 patients were rated by their clinicians. The Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 was used to rate ICD-11 trait domains while PD types were assigned categorically according to ICD-10. Empirical associations were investigated by means of bivariate correlation and logistic regression analyses with bootstrapping. Results overall showed expected and conceptually meaningful associations between ICD-11 trait domains and categorical ICD-10 PD types, with only a few unexpected deviations. Findings suggest that ICD-11 trait domains capture stylistic features of the established PD types in a conceptually coherent manner. These findings may facilitate continuity and guide translation between categorical PD types (i.e., ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [fifth edition]) and the new ICD-11 classification in mental health care. Future research should seek to replicate these findings in various clinical settings while also integrating the essential PD severity classification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved). ",
author = "Bastian Lambrecht and Jonatan Simon and Bo Bach",
year = "2024",
doi = "10.1037/per0000646",
language = "English",
journal = "Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment",
issn = "1949-2715",
publisher = "American Psychological Association",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Clinician-rated ICD-11 trait domains and personality disorder types

AU - Lambrecht, Bastian

AU - Simon, Jonatan

AU - Bach, Bo

PY - 2024

Y1 - 2024

N2 - The International Classification of Diseases (11th edition; ICD-11) has adopted a classification of personality disorders (PDs) that abolishes the established International Classification of Diseases (10th edition; ICD-10) PD types in favor of global severity and stylistic trait domain specifiers. The goal of the current study was to describe the empirical relationship between traditional PD types and the ICD-11 trait domains, which is anticipated to inform and guide clinicians in this profound transition. A total of 246 patients were rated by their clinicians. The Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 was used to rate ICD-11 trait domains while PD types were assigned categorically according to ICD-10. Empirical associations were investigated by means of bivariate correlation and logistic regression analyses with bootstrapping. Results overall showed expected and conceptually meaningful associations between ICD-11 trait domains and categorical ICD-10 PD types, with only a few unexpected deviations. Findings suggest that ICD-11 trait domains capture stylistic features of the established PD types in a conceptually coherent manner. These findings may facilitate continuity and guide translation between categorical PD types (i.e., ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [fifth edition]) and the new ICD-11 classification in mental health care. Future research should seek to replicate these findings in various clinical settings while also integrating the essential PD severity classification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

AB - The International Classification of Diseases (11th edition; ICD-11) has adopted a classification of personality disorders (PDs) that abolishes the established International Classification of Diseases (10th edition; ICD-10) PD types in favor of global severity and stylistic trait domain specifiers. The goal of the current study was to describe the empirical relationship between traditional PD types and the ICD-11 trait domains, which is anticipated to inform and guide clinicians in this profound transition. A total of 246 patients were rated by their clinicians. The Informant-Personality Inventory for ICD-11 was used to rate ICD-11 trait domains while PD types were assigned categorically according to ICD-10. Empirical associations were investigated by means of bivariate correlation and logistic regression analyses with bootstrapping. Results overall showed expected and conceptually meaningful associations between ICD-11 trait domains and categorical ICD-10 PD types, with only a few unexpected deviations. Findings suggest that ICD-11 trait domains capture stylistic features of the established PD types in a conceptually coherent manner. These findings may facilitate continuity and guide translation between categorical PD types (i.e., ICD-10 and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders [fifth edition]) and the new ICD-11 classification in mental health care. Future research should seek to replicate these findings in various clinical settings while also integrating the essential PD severity classification. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

U2 - 10.1037/per0000646

DO - 10.1037/per0000646

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 37956048

JO - Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

JF - Personality Disorders: Theory, Research, and Treatment

SN - 1949-2715

ER -

ID: 380746113