Circular bioeconomy: Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Circular bioeconomy : Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes. / Teigiserova, Dominika Alexa; Hamelin, Lorie; Tiruta-Barna, Ligia; Ahmadi, Aras; Thomsen, Marianne.

I: Science of the Total Environment, Bind 812, 152574, 2022.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Teigiserova, DA, Hamelin, L, Tiruta-Barna, L, Ahmadi, A & Thomsen, M 2022, 'Circular bioeconomy: Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes', Science of the Total Environment, bind 812, 152574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574

APA

Teigiserova, D. A., Hamelin, L., Tiruta-Barna, L., Ahmadi, A., & Thomsen, M. (2022). Circular bioeconomy: Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes. Science of the Total Environment, 812, [152574]. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574

Vancouver

Teigiserova DA, Hamelin L, Tiruta-Barna L, Ahmadi A, Thomsen M. Circular bioeconomy: Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes. Science of the Total Environment. 2022;812. 152574. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574

Author

Teigiserova, Dominika Alexa ; Hamelin, Lorie ; Tiruta-Barna, Ligia ; Ahmadi, Aras ; Thomsen, Marianne. / Circular bioeconomy : Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes. I: Science of the Total Environment. 2022 ; Bind 812.

Bibtex

@article{d3b7eb62ad8f4b27b15df7bc81195b22,
title = "Circular bioeconomy: Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes",
abstract = "Orange peel waste (OPW) is present in large quantities both locally and globally, which makes them feasible input into the circular bioeconomy. However, due to their antimicrobial and anti-nutritional activity, they are problematic biomass, and proper waste management is yet to be determined. This life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the environmental performance of biorefinery producing limonene, citric acid, and animal feed from OPW generated from juice factories. Only previously assessed sustainable technologies were considered (cold press, microwave extraction, solid-state fermentation). The life cycle inventories were refined by a scale-up procedure to reflect industrial production at i) 0.5 t, ii) 100 t, and iii) 1000 t of OPW weekly. The data were translated per functional unit of 1 tonne OPW. Three electricity mixes and both attributional (average) and consequential (marginal) inventories were compared. Results showed that the environmental performance, in particular for climate change, was essentially dependent upon the electricity input, with 4388 CO2 eq for current electricity mix, 2404 CO2 eq using renewable, and 594 CO2 eq using electricity from wind. Business-as-usual scenarios for OPW (incineration and animal feed) showed better performance in most scenarios, representing −150 CO2 eq (animal feed) and −135 CO2 eq (incineration) in the climate change. Lower impacts are reached due to avoided impacts of fossil fuel use and conventional feed cultivation. Renewable energy had better environmental performance than the current electricity mix, except for eutrophication, due to digestate spreading associated with biogas use, calling for mitigation action. Our results suggest that stopping the biorefinery processes immediately after the recovery of limonene via solvent-free microwave extraction process, with subsequent use of the dried OPW as animal feed, is the most environmentally performant option. This represents a feasible strategy for the circular bioeconomy and is in line with the updated food waste hierarchy.",
keywords = "Biorefinery, Circular economy, Citric acid, Food waste, LCA, Limonene",
author = "Teigiserova, {Dominika Alexa} and Lorie Hamelin and Ligia Tiruta-Barna and Aras Ahmadi and Marianne Thomsen",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 The Authors",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574",
language = "English",
volume = "812",
journal = "Science of the Total Environment",
issn = "0048-9697",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Circular bioeconomy

T2 - Life cycle assessment of scaled-up cascading production from orange peel waste under current and future electricity mixes

AU - Teigiserova, Dominika Alexa

AU - Hamelin, Lorie

AU - Tiruta-Barna, Ligia

AU - Ahmadi, Aras

AU - Thomsen, Marianne

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 The Authors

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Orange peel waste (OPW) is present in large quantities both locally and globally, which makes them feasible input into the circular bioeconomy. However, due to their antimicrobial and anti-nutritional activity, they are problematic biomass, and proper waste management is yet to be determined. This life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the environmental performance of biorefinery producing limonene, citric acid, and animal feed from OPW generated from juice factories. Only previously assessed sustainable technologies were considered (cold press, microwave extraction, solid-state fermentation). The life cycle inventories were refined by a scale-up procedure to reflect industrial production at i) 0.5 t, ii) 100 t, and iii) 1000 t of OPW weekly. The data were translated per functional unit of 1 tonne OPW. Three electricity mixes and both attributional (average) and consequential (marginal) inventories were compared. Results showed that the environmental performance, in particular for climate change, was essentially dependent upon the electricity input, with 4388 CO2 eq for current electricity mix, 2404 CO2 eq using renewable, and 594 CO2 eq using electricity from wind. Business-as-usual scenarios for OPW (incineration and animal feed) showed better performance in most scenarios, representing −150 CO2 eq (animal feed) and −135 CO2 eq (incineration) in the climate change. Lower impacts are reached due to avoided impacts of fossil fuel use and conventional feed cultivation. Renewable energy had better environmental performance than the current electricity mix, except for eutrophication, due to digestate spreading associated with biogas use, calling for mitigation action. Our results suggest that stopping the biorefinery processes immediately after the recovery of limonene via solvent-free microwave extraction process, with subsequent use of the dried OPW as animal feed, is the most environmentally performant option. This represents a feasible strategy for the circular bioeconomy and is in line with the updated food waste hierarchy.

AB - Orange peel waste (OPW) is present in large quantities both locally and globally, which makes them feasible input into the circular bioeconomy. However, due to their antimicrobial and anti-nutritional activity, they are problematic biomass, and proper waste management is yet to be determined. This life cycle assessment (LCA) quantifies the environmental performance of biorefinery producing limonene, citric acid, and animal feed from OPW generated from juice factories. Only previously assessed sustainable technologies were considered (cold press, microwave extraction, solid-state fermentation). The life cycle inventories were refined by a scale-up procedure to reflect industrial production at i) 0.5 t, ii) 100 t, and iii) 1000 t of OPW weekly. The data were translated per functional unit of 1 tonne OPW. Three electricity mixes and both attributional (average) and consequential (marginal) inventories were compared. Results showed that the environmental performance, in particular for climate change, was essentially dependent upon the electricity input, with 4388 CO2 eq for current electricity mix, 2404 CO2 eq using renewable, and 594 CO2 eq using electricity from wind. Business-as-usual scenarios for OPW (incineration and animal feed) showed better performance in most scenarios, representing −150 CO2 eq (animal feed) and −135 CO2 eq (incineration) in the climate change. Lower impacts are reached due to avoided impacts of fossil fuel use and conventional feed cultivation. Renewable energy had better environmental performance than the current electricity mix, except for eutrophication, due to digestate spreading associated with biogas use, calling for mitigation action. Our results suggest that stopping the biorefinery processes immediately after the recovery of limonene via solvent-free microwave extraction process, with subsequent use of the dried OPW as animal feed, is the most environmentally performant option. This represents a feasible strategy for the circular bioeconomy and is in line with the updated food waste hierarchy.

KW - Biorefinery

KW - Circular economy

KW - Citric acid

KW - Food waste

KW - LCA

KW - Limonene

U2 - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574

DO - 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.152574

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34954162

AN - SCOPUS:85121860661

VL - 812

JO - Science of the Total Environment

JF - Science of the Total Environment

SN - 0048-9697

M1 - 152574

ER -

ID: 288928340