Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity: a prospective cohort study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity : a prospective cohort study. / Bouknaitir, Jamal Bech; Carreon, Leah Y.; Brorson, Stig; Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden.

I: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, Bind 37, Nr. 1, 2022, s. 57-63.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Bouknaitir, JB, Carreon, LY, Brorson, S & Andersen, MØ 2022, 'Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity: a prospective cohort study', Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, bind 37, nr. 1, s. 57-63. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21445

APA

Bouknaitir, J. B., Carreon, L. Y., Brorson, S., & Andersen, M. Ø. (2022). Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine, 37(1), 57-63. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21445

Vancouver

Bouknaitir JB, Carreon LY, Brorson S, Andersen MØ. Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity: a prospective cohort study. Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2022;37(1):57-63. https://doi.org/10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21445

Author

Bouknaitir, Jamal Bech ; Carreon, Leah Y. ; Brorson, Stig ; Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden. / Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity : a prospective cohort study. I: Journal of Neurosurgery: Spine. 2022 ; Bind 37, Nr. 1. s. 57-63.

Bibtex

@article{f11902be05b74747962a28c0d9cfd5a9,
title = "Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity: a prospective cohort study",
abstract = "OBJECTIVE The authors' objective was to investigate whether sagittal balance improves in patients with spinal stenosis after decompression alone. METHODS This prospective longitudinal cohort study compared preoperative and 6-month postoperative 36-inch full-length radiographs in patients aged older than 60 years. Patients underwent decompression alone for central lumbar spinal stenosis with either a minimally invasive bilateral laminotomy for central decompression, unilateral laminectomy as an over-the-top procedure for bilateral decompression, or traditional wide laminectomy with removal of the spinous processes on both sides. The following radiographic parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, coronal Cobb angle, and sacral slope (SS). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected, including scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and EQ-5D. RESULTS Forty-five patients (24 males) with a mean ± SD age of 71.8 ± 5.6 years were included. Sagittal balance showed statistically significant improvement, with the mean SVA decreasing from 52.3 mm preoperatively to 33.9 mm postoperatively (p = 0.0001). The authors found an increase in LL, from mean -41.5° preoperatively to -43.9° postoperatively, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.055). A statistically significant decrease in PI-LL mismatch from mean 8.4° preoperatively to 5.8° postoperatively was found (p = 0.002). All PROM scores showed significant improvement after spinal decompression surgery. The correlations between SVA and all PROMs were statistically significant at both preoperative and postoperative time points, although most correlations were weak except for those between preoperative SVA and ODI (r = 0.55) and between SVA and VAS for leg pain (r = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Sagittal balance and PROMs show improvement at short-term follow-up evaluations in patients who have undergone decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis.",
keywords = "decompression alone, deformity, degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis, patient-reported outcomes, sagittal balance, sagittal vertical axis",
author = "Bouknaitir, {Jamal Bech} and Carreon, {Leah Y.} and Stig Brorson and Andersen, {Mikkel {\O}sterheden}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} AANS 2022, except where prohibited by US copyright law",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21445",
language = "English",
volume = "37",
pages = "57--63",
journal = "Journal of Neurosurgery",
issn = "0022-3085",
publisher = "American Association of Neurological Surgeons",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Change in sagittal alignment after decompression alone in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis without significant deformity

T2 - a prospective cohort study

AU - Bouknaitir, Jamal Bech

AU - Carreon, Leah Y.

AU - Brorson, Stig

AU - Andersen, Mikkel Østerheden

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © AANS 2022, except where prohibited by US copyright law

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - OBJECTIVE The authors' objective was to investigate whether sagittal balance improves in patients with spinal stenosis after decompression alone. METHODS This prospective longitudinal cohort study compared preoperative and 6-month postoperative 36-inch full-length radiographs in patients aged older than 60 years. Patients underwent decompression alone for central lumbar spinal stenosis with either a minimally invasive bilateral laminotomy for central decompression, unilateral laminectomy as an over-the-top procedure for bilateral decompression, or traditional wide laminectomy with removal of the spinous processes on both sides. The following radiographic parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, coronal Cobb angle, and sacral slope (SS). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected, including scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and EQ-5D. RESULTS Forty-five patients (24 males) with a mean ± SD age of 71.8 ± 5.6 years were included. Sagittal balance showed statistically significant improvement, with the mean SVA decreasing from 52.3 mm preoperatively to 33.9 mm postoperatively (p = 0.0001). The authors found an increase in LL, from mean -41.5° preoperatively to -43.9° postoperatively, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.055). A statistically significant decrease in PI-LL mismatch from mean 8.4° preoperatively to 5.8° postoperatively was found (p = 0.002). All PROM scores showed significant improvement after spinal decompression surgery. The correlations between SVA and all PROMs were statistically significant at both preoperative and postoperative time points, although most correlations were weak except for those between preoperative SVA and ODI (r = 0.55) and between SVA and VAS for leg pain (r = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Sagittal balance and PROMs show improvement at short-term follow-up evaluations in patients who have undergone decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis.

AB - OBJECTIVE The authors' objective was to investigate whether sagittal balance improves in patients with spinal stenosis after decompression alone. METHODS This prospective longitudinal cohort study compared preoperative and 6-month postoperative 36-inch full-length radiographs in patients aged older than 60 years. Patients underwent decompression alone for central lumbar spinal stenosis with either a minimally invasive bilateral laminotomy for central decompression, unilateral laminectomy as an over-the-top procedure for bilateral decompression, or traditional wide laminectomy with removal of the spinous processes on both sides. The following radiographic parameters were measured: sagittal vertical axis (SVA), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), PI-LL mismatch, coronal Cobb angle, and sacral slope (SS). Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were collected, including scores on the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), visual analog scale (VAS) for leg and back pain, and EQ-5D. RESULTS Forty-five patients (24 males) with a mean ± SD age of 71.8 ± 5.6 years were included. Sagittal balance showed statistically significant improvement, with the mean SVA decreasing from 52.3 mm preoperatively to 33.9 mm postoperatively (p = 0.0001). The authors found an increase in LL, from mean -41.5° preoperatively to -43.9° postoperatively, but this was not statistically significant (p = 0.055). A statistically significant decrease in PI-LL mismatch from mean 8.4° preoperatively to 5.8° postoperatively was found (p = 0.002). All PROM scores showed significant improvement after spinal decompression surgery. The correlations between SVA and all PROMs were statistically significant at both preoperative and postoperative time points, although most correlations were weak except for those between preoperative SVA and ODI (r = 0.55) and between SVA and VAS for leg pain (r = 0.58). CONCLUSIONS Sagittal balance and PROMs show improvement at short-term follow-up evaluations in patients who have undergone decompression alone for lumbar spinal stenosis.

KW - decompression alone

KW - deformity

KW - degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis

KW - patient-reported outcomes

KW - sagittal balance

KW - sagittal vertical axis

U2 - 10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21445

DO - 10.3171/2021.10.SPINE21445

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34996042

AN - SCOPUS:85133331127

VL - 37

SP - 57

EP - 63

JO - Journal of Neurosurgery

JF - Journal of Neurosurgery

SN - 0022-3085

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 330384582