Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. / Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf; Chakera, Annette Hougaard; Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz; Drejøe, Jennifer Berg; Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth; Khorasani, Hoda; Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour; Thomsen, Jørn Bo; Sørensen, Jens Ahm.

I: JPRAS Open, Bind 34, 2022, s. 134-143.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jørgensen, MG, Chakera, AH, Hölmich, LR, Drejøe, JB, Andersen, PCL, Khorasani, H, Toyserkani, NM, Thomsen, JB & Sørensen, JA 2022, 'Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial', JPRAS Open, bind 34, s. 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003

APA

Jørgensen, M. G., Chakera, A. H., Hölmich, L. R., Drejøe, J. B., Andersen, P. C. L., Khorasani, H., Toyserkani, N. M., Thomsen, J. B., & Sørensen, J. A. (2022). Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. JPRAS Open, 34, 134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003

Vancouver

Jørgensen MG, Chakera AH, Hölmich LR, Drejøe JB, Andersen PCL, Khorasani H o.a. Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. JPRAS Open. 2022;34:134-143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003

Author

Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf ; Chakera, Annette Hougaard ; Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz ; Drejøe, Jennifer Berg ; Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth ; Khorasani, Hoda ; Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour ; Thomsen, Jørn Bo ; Sørensen, Jens Ahm. / Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial. I: JPRAS Open. 2022 ; Bind 34. s. 134-143.

Bibtex

@article{389f9ae980584c4e81914b0596e4bed3,
title = "Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial",
abstract = "Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of surgical-site infection (p = 0.63), wound rupture (p = 0.19), wound necrosis (p = 0.82), hematoma (p = 0.19), reoperation (p = 0.82) or readmission (p = 0.34) between groups. Conclusion: There was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937.",
keywords = "Complications, Lymph node dissection, Melanoma, Negative-pressure wound therapy, PICO, Seroma, VAC",
author = "J{\o}rgensen, {Mads Gustaf} and Chakera, {Annette Hougaard} and H{\"o}lmich, {Lisbet Rosenkrantz} and Drej{\o}e, {Jennifer Berg} and Andersen, {Pia Cajsa Leth} and Hoda Khorasani and Toyserkani, {Navid Mohamadpour} and Thomsen, {J{\o}rn Bo} and S{\o}rensen, {Jens Ahm}",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2022",
year = "2022",
doi = "10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003",
language = "English",
volume = "34",
pages = "134--143",
journal = "J P R A S Open",
issn = "2352-5878",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Can prophylactic incisional negative pressure wound therapy Reduce Wound Complications After Inguinal Lymph Node Dissection for Melanoma? Results from a Randomized Controlled Trial

AU - Jørgensen, Mads Gustaf

AU - Chakera, Annette Hougaard

AU - Hölmich, Lisbet Rosenkrantz

AU - Drejøe, Jennifer Berg

AU - Andersen, Pia Cajsa Leth

AU - Khorasani, Hoda

AU - Toyserkani, Navid Mohamadpour

AU - Thomsen, Jørn Bo

AU - Sørensen, Jens Ahm

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2022

PY - 2022

Y1 - 2022

N2 - Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of surgical-site infection (p = 0.63), wound rupture (p = 0.19), wound necrosis (p = 0.82), hematoma (p = 0.19), reoperation (p = 0.82) or readmission (p = 0.34) between groups. Conclusion: There was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937.

AB - Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection (ILND) is associated with a high complication rate. Retrospective studies suggest that incisional negative pressure wound therapy (iNPWT) might reduce complications, especially seroma, following ILND. Methods: This was a prospective multicenter, randomized (1:1), open-labeled, parallel-group trial. Patients with macrometastic melanoma to the inguinal lymph nodes and eligible for ILND were randomized to receive either iNPWT for 14 postoperative days or conventional wound dressing. The primary outcome was seroma incidence. Secondary outcomes included surgical-site infection, wound rupture, wound necrosis, hematoma, rehospitalization and readmission rates between groups. All outcomes were registered 3 months after ILND and analyzed according to the intention-to-treat principle. Results: The trial was terminated early due to a low recruitment rate as a consequence of a change in the national treatment protocol, and the estimated sample size was not reached. Twenty patients were included and randomized in the study. The trial showed less seroma formation between the iNPWT 6/11 (55%) and control 7/9 (78%) groups; however, this was not statistically significant (p = 0.29). Similarly, there were no differences in the rates of surgical-site infection (p = 0.63), wound rupture (p = 0.19), wound necrosis (p = 0.82), hematoma (p = 0.19), reoperation (p = 0.82) or readmission (p = 0.34) between groups. Conclusion: There was a tendency toward fewer complications in the iNPWT group, however this trial was underpowered and could not confirm the hypothesis that iNPWT reduces complications after ILND. Future randomized controlled trials are required to fully evaluate the treatment potential of iNPWT. Trial registration: The trial was prospectively registered at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03433937.

KW - Complications

KW - Lymph node dissection

KW - Melanoma

KW - Negative-pressure wound therapy

KW - PICO

KW - Seroma

KW - VAC

U2 - 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003

DO - 10.1016/j.jpra.2022.08.003

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36304071

AN - SCOPUS:85141865119

VL - 34

SP - 134

EP - 143

JO - J P R A S Open

JF - J P R A S Open

SN - 2352-5878

ER -

ID: 340535892