Assessment of migrant and minority children

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Assessment of migrant and minority children. / Schölmerich, Axel; Leyendecker, Birgit; Citlak, Banu; Caspar, Ulrike; Jäkel, Julia.

I: Journal of Psychology, Bind 216, Nr. 3, 2008, s. 187-194.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftReviewForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Schölmerich, A, Leyendecker, B, Citlak, B, Caspar, U & Jäkel, J 2008, 'Assessment of migrant and minority children', Journal of Psychology, bind 216, nr. 3, s. 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.187

APA

Schölmerich, A., Leyendecker, B., Citlak, B., Caspar, U., & Jäkel, J. (2008). Assessment of migrant and minority children. Journal of Psychology, 216(3), 187-194. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.187

Vancouver

Schölmerich A, Leyendecker B, Citlak B, Caspar U, Jäkel J. Assessment of migrant and minority children. Journal of Psychology. 2008;216(3):187-194. https://doi.org/10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.187

Author

Schölmerich, Axel ; Leyendecker, Birgit ; Citlak, Banu ; Caspar, Ulrike ; Jäkel, Julia. / Assessment of migrant and minority children. I: Journal of Psychology. 2008 ; Bind 216, Nr. 3. s. 187-194.

Bibtex

@article{f3b755032f3d405795a37a07e28f4a32,
title = "Assessment of migrant and minority children",
abstract = "Testing children with minority status or migration background poses particular challenges for educators and researchers. More obvious are language barriers, but there may also be more complex limitations based on cultural or contextual differences. The literature on testing migrant and minority children is summarized in a brief historical perspective, focusing on the use of standardized tests. Potential biases in testing minority and migrant children are discussed, and empirical results of testing two groups of preschool age children of nonmigrant (N = 50) and migrant status (N = 35) with the ET 6-6 in Germany are presented. Results indicate significant group differences to the disadvantage of the migrant children in some scales, however, both groups scored within the normal range of one standard deviation around the test norm. The migrant group children were tested in their dominant language, and they used more time to complete the test. Interpretation of test results should use caution, particularly when using tests to support placement in educational settings.",
keywords = "Developmental assessment, ET 6-6, Language barriers, Migrant children, Minority children",
author = "Axel Sch{\"o}lmerich and Birgit Leyendecker and Banu Citlak and Ulrike Caspar and Julia J{\"a}kel",
year = "2008",
doi = "10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.187",
language = "English",
volume = "216",
pages = "187--194",
journal = "Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology",
issn = "0044-3409",
publisher = "Hogrefe Publishing",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessment of migrant and minority children

AU - Schölmerich, Axel

AU - Leyendecker, Birgit

AU - Citlak, Banu

AU - Caspar, Ulrike

AU - Jäkel, Julia

PY - 2008

Y1 - 2008

N2 - Testing children with minority status or migration background poses particular challenges for educators and researchers. More obvious are language barriers, but there may also be more complex limitations based on cultural or contextual differences. The literature on testing migrant and minority children is summarized in a brief historical perspective, focusing on the use of standardized tests. Potential biases in testing minority and migrant children are discussed, and empirical results of testing two groups of preschool age children of nonmigrant (N = 50) and migrant status (N = 35) with the ET 6-6 in Germany are presented. Results indicate significant group differences to the disadvantage of the migrant children in some scales, however, both groups scored within the normal range of one standard deviation around the test norm. The migrant group children were tested in their dominant language, and they used more time to complete the test. Interpretation of test results should use caution, particularly when using tests to support placement in educational settings.

AB - Testing children with minority status or migration background poses particular challenges for educators and researchers. More obvious are language barriers, but there may also be more complex limitations based on cultural or contextual differences. The literature on testing migrant and minority children is summarized in a brief historical perspective, focusing on the use of standardized tests. Potential biases in testing minority and migrant children are discussed, and empirical results of testing two groups of preschool age children of nonmigrant (N = 50) and migrant status (N = 35) with the ET 6-6 in Germany are presented. Results indicate significant group differences to the disadvantage of the migrant children in some scales, however, both groups scored within the normal range of one standard deviation around the test norm. The migrant group children were tested in their dominant language, and they used more time to complete the test. Interpretation of test results should use caution, particularly when using tests to support placement in educational settings.

KW - Developmental assessment

KW - ET 6-6

KW - Language barriers

KW - Migrant children

KW - Minority children

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=49149115916&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.187

DO - 10.1027/0044-3409.216.3.187

M3 - Review

AN - SCOPUS:49149115916

VL - 216

SP - 187

EP - 194

JO - Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

JF - Zeitschrift fur Psychologie / Journal of Psychology

SN - 0044-3409

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 393147157