Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first-admission hospital sample
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first-admission hospital sample. / Nordgaard, Julie; Revsbech, Rasmus; Sæbye, Ditte; Parnas, Josef.
I: World Psychiatry, Bind 11, Nr. 3, 10.2012, s. 181-185.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Assessing the diagnostic validity of a structured psychiatric interview in a first-admission hospital sample
AU - Nordgaard, Julie
AU - Revsbech, Rasmus
AU - Sæbye, Ditte
AU - Parnas, Josef
PY - 2012/10
Y1 - 2012/10
N2 - The use of structured psychiatric interviews performed by non-clinicians is frequent for research purposes and is becoming increasingly common in clini-cal practice. The validity of such interviews has rarely been evaluated empirically. In this study of a sample of 100 diagnostically heterogeneous, first-admitted inpatients, the results of an assessment with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), yielding a DSM-IV diagnosis and performed by a trained non-clinician, were compared with a consensus lifetime best diagnostic estimate (DSM-IV) by two experienced research clinicians, based on multiple sources of information, which included videotaped comprehensive semi-structured narrative interviews. The overall kappa agreement was 0.18. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of schizophrenia by SCID were 19% and 100%, respectively. It is concluded that structured interviews performed by non-clinicians are not recommendable for clinical work and should only be used in research with certain precautions. It is suggested that a revival of systematic theoretical and practical training in psychopathology is an obvious way forward in order to improve the validity and therapeutic utility of psychiatric diagnosis.
AB - The use of structured psychiatric interviews performed by non-clinicians is frequent for research purposes and is becoming increasingly common in clini-cal practice. The validity of such interviews has rarely been evaluated empirically. In this study of a sample of 100 diagnostically heterogeneous, first-admitted inpatients, the results of an assessment with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV (SCID), yielding a DSM-IV diagnosis and performed by a trained non-clinician, were compared with a consensus lifetime best diagnostic estimate (DSM-IV) by two experienced research clinicians, based on multiple sources of information, which included videotaped comprehensive semi-structured narrative interviews. The overall kappa agreement was 0.18. The sensitivity and specificity for the diagnosis of schizophrenia by SCID were 19% and 100%, respectively. It is concluded that structured interviews performed by non-clinicians are not recommendable for clinical work and should only be used in research with certain precautions. It is suggested that a revival of systematic theoretical and practical training in psychopathology is an obvious way forward in order to improve the validity and therapeutic utility of psychiatric diagnosis.
U2 - 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2012.tb00128.x
DO - 10.1002/j.2051-5545.2012.tb00128.x
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 23024678
VL - 11
SP - 181
EP - 185
JO - World Psychiatry
JF - World Psychiatry
SN - 1723-8617
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 187624283