Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory. / Clifton, Rob; Halvorson, Hans.

I: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, Bind 52, Nr. 3, 2001, s. 417-470.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Clifton, R & Halvorson, H 2001, 'Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory', British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, bind 52, nr. 3, s. 417-470. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/52.3.417

APA

Clifton, R., & Halvorson, H. (2001). Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, 52(3), 417-470. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/52.3.417

Vancouver

Clifton R, Halvorson H. Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory. British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2001;52(3):417-470. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjps/52.3.417

Author

Clifton, Rob ; Halvorson, Hans. / Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory. I: British Journal for the Philosophy of Science. 2001 ; Bind 52, Nr. 3. s. 417-470.

Bibtex

@article{acf04a3964984c0eb10079a7200dd952,
title = "Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory",
abstract = "Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the 'reality' of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hubert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a 'particle' will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.",
author = "Rob Clifton and Hans Halvorson",
year = "2001",
doi = "10.1093/bjps/52.3.417",
language = "English",
volume = "52",
pages = "417--470",
journal = "British Journal for the Philosophy of Science",
issn = "0007-0882",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Are rindler quanta real? Inequivalent particle concepts in quantum field theory

AU - Clifton, Rob

AU - Halvorson, Hans

PY - 2001

Y1 - 2001

N2 - Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the 'reality' of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hubert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a 'particle' will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.

AB - Philosophical reflection on quantum field theory has tended to focus on how it revises our conception of what a particle is. However, there has been relatively little discussion of the threat to the 'reality' of particles posed by the possibility of inequivalent quantizations of a classical field theory, i.e. inequivalent representations of the algebra of observables of the field in terms of operators on a Hubert space. The threat is that each representation embodies its own distinctive conception of what a particle is, and how a 'particle' will respond to a suitably operated detector. Our main goal is to clarify the subtle relationship between inequivalent representations of a field theory and their associated particle concepts. We also have a particular interest in the Minkowski versus Rindler quantizations of a free Boson field, because they respectively entail two radically different descriptions of the particle content of the field in the very same region of spacetime. We shall defend the idea that these representations provide complementary descriptions of the same state of the field against the claim that they embody completely incommensurable theories of the field.

U2 - 10.1093/bjps/52.3.417

DO - 10.1093/bjps/52.3.417

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:0006194706

VL - 52

SP - 417

EP - 470

JO - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

JF - British Journal for the Philosophy of Science

SN - 0007-0882

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 289119263