Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. / Moscarelli, Marco; Gallo, Francesco; Gallone, Guglielmo; Kim, Won Keun; Reifart, Jörg; Veulemans, Verena; Zeus, Tobias; Toggweiler, Stefan; De Backer, Ole; Søndergaard, Lars; Mangieri, Antonio; De Marco, Federico; Regazzoli, Damiano; Reimers, Bernhard; Muntané-Carol, Guillem; Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez; Armario, Xavier; Mylotte, Darren; Bhadra, Oliver Daniel; Conradi, Lenard; Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin; Nombela-Franco, Luis; Barbanti, Marco; Reddavid, Claudia; Brugaletta, Salvatore; Nicolini, Elisa; Tzanis, Giorgos; Rodes-Cabau, Josep; Colombo, Antonio; Giannini, Francesco.

I: International Journal of Cardiology, Bind 338, 2021, s. 58-62.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Moscarelli, M, Gallo, F, Gallone, G, Kim, WK, Reifart, J, Veulemans, V, Zeus, T, Toggweiler, S, De Backer, O, Søndergaard, L, Mangieri, A, De Marco, F, Regazzoli, D, Reimers, B, Muntané-Carol, G, Lauriero, RE, Armario, X, Mylotte, D, Bhadra, OD, Conradi, L, Donday, LAM, Nombela-Franco, L, Barbanti, M, Reddavid, C, Brugaletta, S, Nicolini, E, Tzanis, G, Rodes-Cabau, J, Colombo, A & Giannini, F 2021, 'Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement', International Journal of Cardiology, bind 338, s. 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054

APA

Moscarelli, M., Gallo, F., Gallone, G., Kim, W. K., Reifart, J., Veulemans, V., Zeus, T., Toggweiler, S., De Backer, O., Søndergaard, L., Mangieri, A., De Marco, F., Regazzoli, D., Reimers, B., Muntané-Carol, G., Lauriero, R. E., Armario, X., Mylotte, D., Bhadra, O. D., ... Giannini, F. (2021). Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. International Journal of Cardiology, 338, 58-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054

Vancouver

Moscarelli M, Gallo F, Gallone G, Kim WK, Reifart J, Veulemans V o.a. Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. International Journal of Cardiology. 2021;338:58-62. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054

Author

Moscarelli, Marco ; Gallo, Francesco ; Gallone, Guglielmo ; Kim, Won Keun ; Reifart, Jörg ; Veulemans, Verena ; Zeus, Tobias ; Toggweiler, Stefan ; De Backer, Ole ; Søndergaard, Lars ; Mangieri, Antonio ; De Marco, Federico ; Regazzoli, Damiano ; Reimers, Bernhard ; Muntané-Carol, Guillem ; Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez ; Armario, Xavier ; Mylotte, Darren ; Bhadra, Oliver Daniel ; Conradi, Lenard ; Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin ; Nombela-Franco, Luis ; Barbanti, Marco ; Reddavid, Claudia ; Brugaletta, Salvatore ; Nicolini, Elisa ; Tzanis, Giorgos ; Rodes-Cabau, Josep ; Colombo, Antonio ; Giannini, Francesco. / Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement. I: International Journal of Cardiology. 2021 ; Bind 338. s. 58-62.

Bibtex

@article{804959345af940c09ebda0c8bbc06119,
title = "Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement",
abstract = "Background: Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. Results: For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p < 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p < 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. Conclusions: We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR.",
keywords = "Aortic angle, Horizontal aorta, Obesity paradox, TAVR, Transcatheter aortic valve replacement",
author = "Marco Moscarelli and Francesco Gallo and Guglielmo Gallone and Kim, {Won Keun} and J{\"o}rg Reifart and Verena Veulemans and Tobias Zeus and Stefan Toggweiler and {De Backer}, Ole and Lars S{\o}ndergaard and Antonio Mangieri and {De Marco}, Federico and Damiano Regazzoli and Bernhard Reimers and Guillem Muntan{\'e}-Carol and Lauriero, {Rodrigo Estevez} and Xavier Armario and Darren Mylotte and Bhadra, {Oliver Daniel} and Lenard Conradi and Donday, {Luis Alfonso Marroquin} and Luis Nombela-Franco and Marco Barbanti and Claudia Reddavid and Salvatore Brugaletta and Elisa Nicolini and Giorgos Tzanis and Josep Rodes-Cabau and Antonio Colombo and Francesco Giannini",
note = "Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Dr. Ashley Symons (symonsediting@gmail.com) for professional scientific editing of this article. Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054",
language = "English",
volume = "338",
pages = "58--62",
journal = "International Journal of Cardiology",
issn = "0167-5273",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Aortic angle distribution and predictors of horizontal aorta in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement

AU - Moscarelli, Marco

AU - Gallo, Francesco

AU - Gallone, Guglielmo

AU - Kim, Won Keun

AU - Reifart, Jörg

AU - Veulemans, Verena

AU - Zeus, Tobias

AU - Toggweiler, Stefan

AU - De Backer, Ole

AU - Søndergaard, Lars

AU - Mangieri, Antonio

AU - De Marco, Federico

AU - Regazzoli, Damiano

AU - Reimers, Bernhard

AU - Muntané-Carol, Guillem

AU - Lauriero, Rodrigo Estevez

AU - Armario, Xavier

AU - Mylotte, Darren

AU - Bhadra, Oliver Daniel

AU - Conradi, Lenard

AU - Donday, Luis Alfonso Marroquin

AU - Nombela-Franco, Luis

AU - Barbanti, Marco

AU - Reddavid, Claudia

AU - Brugaletta, Salvatore

AU - Nicolini, Elisa

AU - Tzanis, Giorgos

AU - Rodes-Cabau, Josep

AU - Colombo, Antonio

AU - Giannini, Francesco

N1 - Funding Information: The authors would like to thank Dr. Ashley Symons (symonsediting@gmail.com) for professional scientific editing of this article. Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Background: Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. Results: For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p < 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p < 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. Conclusions: We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR.

AB - Background: Horizontal aorta (HA) is an anatomical feature that can pose significant technical challenges for the successful positioning of the bioprosthetic valve during transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR). Physiological range of aortic angle (AA) is unknown; hence there is no cutoff AA for classifying HA. Moreover, patient characteristics predicting HA are under-investigated. Methods: This was a retrospective analysis of prospective collected data from 16 heart valve centers in Europe. The study utilized a common dataset with a priori agreed-upon definitions and variables. Eligible patients underwent TAVR between 2014 and 2020 and had multidetector computed tomographic imaging data available for determining the AA. The analysis described the distribution of AA and potential predictors of HA. Inter-center variability was also explored. Results: For 4022 patients analyzed, the mean AA ± standard deviation was 49.4° ± 9.4° (median 49°, inter-quartile range [IQR] 12°, range 18–90°). There was no significant difference in mean AA between men and women (49.4° ± 9.1° vs. 49.6° ± 9.3°, respectively; p = 0.53); therefore, 49.4° was accepted as the cutoff value for HA in subsequent analyses. Covariates significantly associated with HA included age (odds ratio [OR]: 1.02, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.01–1.04, p < 0.001), body mass index (OR: 1.06, 95% CI: 1.05–1.08, p < 0.01), previous cardiac surgery (OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.45–0.75, p < 0.001), and porcelain aorta (OR: 0.66, 95% CI: 0.52–0.85, p = 0.001). Some inter-center variability was observed. Conclusions: We defined 49.4° as the mean AA, and also associated predictors of HA in a large case series of patients with severe aortic stenosis candidates for TAVR.

KW - Aortic angle

KW - Horizontal aorta

KW - Obesity paradox

KW - TAVR

KW - Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

U2 - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054

DO - 10.1016/j.ijcard.2021.05.054

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 34090956

AN - SCOPUS:85107609774

VL - 338

SP - 58

EP - 62

JO - International Journal of Cardiology

JF - International Journal of Cardiology

SN - 0167-5273

ER -

ID: 302196481