Analysis of nonstationarity in renal autoregulation mechanisms using time-varying transfer and coherence functions.
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Analysis of nonstationarity in renal autoregulation mechanisms using time-varying transfer and coherence functions. / Chon, Ki H; Zhong, Yuru; Moore, Leon C; Cupples, William A; Holstein-Rathlou, N.-H.
I: American Journal of Physiology: Regulatory, Integrative and Comparative Physiology, Bind 295, Nr. 3, 2008, s. R821-8.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Analysis of nonstationarity in renal autoregulation mechanisms using time-varying transfer and coherence functions.
AU - Chon, Ki H
AU - Zhong, Yuru
AU - Moore, Leon C
AU - Cupples, William A
AU - Holstein-Rathlou, N.-H.
N1 - Keywords: Animals; Blood Pressure; Feedback, Biochemical; Homeostasis; Hypertension, Renal; Kidney Glomerulus; Kidney Tubules; Male; Models, Biological; Rats; Rats, Inbred SHR; Rats, Sprague-Dawley; Renal Circulation
PY - 2008
Y1 - 2008
N2 - The extent to which renal blood flow dynamics vary in time and whether such variation contributes substantively to dynamic complexity have emerged as important questions. Data from Sprague-Dawley rats (SDR) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were analyzed by time-varying transfer functions (TVTF) and time-varying coherence functions (TVCF). Both TVTF and TVCF allow quantification of nonstationarity in the frequency ranges associated with the autoregulatory mechanisms. TVTF analysis shows that autoregulatory gain in SDR and SHR varies in time and that SHR exhibit significantly more nonstationarity than SDR. TVTF gain in the frequency range associated with the myogenic mechanism was significantly higher in SDR than in SHR, but no statistical difference was found with tubuloglomerular (TGF) gain. Furthermore, TVCF analysis revealed that the coherence in both strains is significantly nonstationary and that low-frequency coherence was negatively correlated with autoregulatory gain. TVCF in the frequency range from 0.1 to 0.3 Hz was significantly higher in SDR (7 out of 7, >0.5) than in SHR (5 out of 6, <0.5), and consistent for all time points. For TGF frequency range (0.03-0.05 Hz), coherence exhibited substantial nonstationarity in both strains. Five of six SHR had mean coherence (<0.5), while four of seven SDR exhibited coherence (<0.5). Together, these results demonstrate substantial nonstationarity in autoregulatory dynamics in both SHR and SDR. Furthermore, they indicate that the nonstationarity accounts for most of the dynamic complexity in SDR, but that it accounts for only a part of the dynamic complexity in SHR.
AB - The extent to which renal blood flow dynamics vary in time and whether such variation contributes substantively to dynamic complexity have emerged as important questions. Data from Sprague-Dawley rats (SDR) and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR) were analyzed by time-varying transfer functions (TVTF) and time-varying coherence functions (TVCF). Both TVTF and TVCF allow quantification of nonstationarity in the frequency ranges associated with the autoregulatory mechanisms. TVTF analysis shows that autoregulatory gain in SDR and SHR varies in time and that SHR exhibit significantly more nonstationarity than SDR. TVTF gain in the frequency range associated with the myogenic mechanism was significantly higher in SDR than in SHR, but no statistical difference was found with tubuloglomerular (TGF) gain. Furthermore, TVCF analysis revealed that the coherence in both strains is significantly nonstationary and that low-frequency coherence was negatively correlated with autoregulatory gain. TVCF in the frequency range from 0.1 to 0.3 Hz was significantly higher in SDR (7 out of 7, >0.5) than in SHR (5 out of 6, <0.5), and consistent for all time points. For TGF frequency range (0.03-0.05 Hz), coherence exhibited substantial nonstationarity in both strains. Five of six SHR had mean coherence (<0.5), while four of seven SDR exhibited coherence (<0.5). Together, these results demonstrate substantial nonstationarity in autoregulatory dynamics in both SHR and SDR. Furthermore, they indicate that the nonstationarity accounts for most of the dynamic complexity in SDR, but that it accounts for only a part of the dynamic complexity in SHR.
U2 - 10.1152/ajpregu.00582.2007
DO - 10.1152/ajpregu.00582.2007
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 18495831
VL - 295
SP - R821-8
JO - American Journal of Physiology
JF - American Journal of Physiology
SN - 0363-6119
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 8419747