Activated and included? The social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries engaged in “public works”
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Activated and included? The social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries engaged in “public works”. / Girardi, Silvia; Pulignano, Valeria; Maas, Roland.
I: International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy, Bind 39, Nr. 9-10, 2019, s. 738-751.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Activated and included? The social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries engaged in “public works”
AU - Girardi, Silvia
AU - Pulignano, Valeria
AU - Maas, Roland
N1 - Funding Information: Funding information: supported by the Luxembourg National Research Fund (FNR) (10239475). Publisher Copyright: © 2019, Emerald Publishing Limited.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discuss how employment regulations and stigma, arising from working for welfare in “public works”, limit the social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries. Activation in “public works” is meant for those beneficiaries unable to participate to the unsubsidised labour market because of range of work impairments. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on qualitative interviews concerning the perspectives of social assistance beneficiaries in Luxembourg who work in “public works” activation schemes in exchange for social assistance support. The paper uses an encompassing definition of social inclusion based on the idea of social rights. Findings: Access to legal employment status and to social rights are fundamental conditions to foster social inclusion and labour market integration. People in “public works” schemes consider their inclusion hampered by the lack of a legal status that could allow them to access social rights, basic social services and economic life – such as decent housing or access to credit – and the presence of stigma related to working for social assistance. Social implications: Ensuring social protection of work and lifting stigma aside labour market integration are key for a social inclusion strategy that could support social assistance beneficiaries’ social inclusion. Originality/value: Debate on activation, including that arising from social investment, stress the centrality of labour market integration for social inclusion but does not take into account institutional factors – such as the social protection of work – and stigmatisation practices that can directly undermine the social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries working for welfare.
AB - Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to discuss how employment regulations and stigma, arising from working for welfare in “public works”, limit the social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries. Activation in “public works” is meant for those beneficiaries unable to participate to the unsubsidised labour market because of range of work impairments. Design/methodology/approach: The paper is based on qualitative interviews concerning the perspectives of social assistance beneficiaries in Luxembourg who work in “public works” activation schemes in exchange for social assistance support. The paper uses an encompassing definition of social inclusion based on the idea of social rights. Findings: Access to legal employment status and to social rights are fundamental conditions to foster social inclusion and labour market integration. People in “public works” schemes consider their inclusion hampered by the lack of a legal status that could allow them to access social rights, basic social services and economic life – such as decent housing or access to credit – and the presence of stigma related to working for social assistance. Social implications: Ensuring social protection of work and lifting stigma aside labour market integration are key for a social inclusion strategy that could support social assistance beneficiaries’ social inclusion. Originality/value: Debate on activation, including that arising from social investment, stress the centrality of labour market integration for social inclusion but does not take into account institutional factors – such as the social protection of work – and stigmatisation practices that can directly undermine the social inclusion of social assistance beneficiaries working for welfare.
KW - Activation policies
KW - Labour market
KW - Luxembourg
KW - Minimum income scheme
KW - Social assistance
KW - Social inclusion
U2 - 10.1108/IJSSP-01-2019-0023
DO - 10.1108/IJSSP-01-2019-0023
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85073926956
VL - 39
SP - 738
EP - 751
JO - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
JF - International Journal of Sociology and Social Policy
SN - 0144-333X
IS - 9-10
ER -
ID: 371373907