Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery: A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery : A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative. / Nayahangan, Leizl J; Van Herzeele, Isabelle; Konge, Lars; Koncar, Igor; Cieri, Enrico; Mansilha, Armando; Debus, Sebastian; Eiberg, Jonas P.
I: European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, Bind 58, Nr. 2, 2019, s. 284-291.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Achieving Consensus to Define Curricular Content for Simulation Based Education in Vascular Surgery
T2 - A Europe Wide Needs Assessment Initiative
AU - Nayahangan, Leizl J
AU - Van Herzeele, Isabelle
AU - Konge, Lars
AU - Koncar, Igor
AU - Cieri, Enrico
AU - Mansilha, Armando
AU - Debus, Sebastian
AU - Eiberg, Jonas P.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - OBJECTIVE: To gather consensus among European educators about technical procedures that should be included in a future simulation based curriculum in vascular surgery.METHODS: A three round modified Delphi survey was initiated among 189 key opinion leaders (KOL) from 34 countries across Europe who were identified according to their positions in the European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes Section and Board of Vascular Surgery. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified vascular surgeon should be able to perform. The answers were analysed qualitatively. The second round investigated how often the identified procedures are performed, the number of vascular surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, whether the procedures pose a risk to the patients, and whether simulation based education (SBE) is feasible. In the third round, elimination and re-ranking of procedures were performed. Only procedures that gained more than 70% support were included. An international steering group consisting of open and endovascular surgeons and medical educators governed the process.RESULTS: Response rates in the three rounds were 75% (142/189), 89% (126/142), and 85% (107/126), respectively. In the final prioritised list of 30 technical procedures for SBE, the top five procedures focus on basic open vascular skills, basic endovascular skills, vascular imaging interpretation, femoral endarterectomy, and open peripheral bypass. Twenty-six procedures were eliminated, including peripheral pressure measurement, wound management, open management of complications, major amputations, and highly advanced endovascular skills.CONCLUSION: The prioritised list of technical procedures from this ESVS supported project could be used to guide planning and development of future SBE programs to meet the needs of vascular surgeons across Europe.
AB - OBJECTIVE: To gather consensus among European educators about technical procedures that should be included in a future simulation based curriculum in vascular surgery.METHODS: A three round modified Delphi survey was initiated among 189 key opinion leaders (KOL) from 34 countries across Europe who were identified according to their positions in the European Society for Vascular Surgery, the European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, and Union Européenne des Médecins Spécialistes Section and Board of Vascular Surgery. The first round was a brainstorming phase to identify technical procedures that a newly qualified vascular surgeon should be able to perform. The answers were analysed qualitatively. The second round investigated how often the identified procedures are performed, the number of vascular surgeons that should be able to perform these procedures, whether the procedures pose a risk to the patients, and whether simulation based education (SBE) is feasible. In the third round, elimination and re-ranking of procedures were performed. Only procedures that gained more than 70% support were included. An international steering group consisting of open and endovascular surgeons and medical educators governed the process.RESULTS: Response rates in the three rounds were 75% (142/189), 89% (126/142), and 85% (107/126), respectively. In the final prioritised list of 30 technical procedures for SBE, the top five procedures focus on basic open vascular skills, basic endovascular skills, vascular imaging interpretation, femoral endarterectomy, and open peripheral bypass. Twenty-six procedures were eliminated, including peripheral pressure measurement, wound management, open management of complications, major amputations, and highly advanced endovascular skills.CONCLUSION: The prioritised list of technical procedures from this ESVS supported project could be used to guide planning and development of future SBE programs to meet the needs of vascular surgeons across Europe.
KW - Clinical Competence/standards
KW - Consensus
KW - Curriculum
KW - Delphi Technique
KW - Education, Medical, Graduate/standards
KW - Educational Status
KW - Europe
KW - Humans
KW - Program Development
KW - Simulation Training/standards
KW - Surgeons/education
KW - Vascular Surgical Procedures/education
U2 - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.022
DO - 10.1016/j.ejvs.2019.03.022
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 31230867
VL - 58
SP - 284
EP - 291
JO - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
JF - European Journal of Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
SN - 1078-5884
IS - 2
ER -
ID: 241887888