TY - JOUR

T1 - Accuracy of the Danish version of the 'distress thermometer'

AU - Bidstrup, Pernille Envold

AU - Mertz, Birgitte

AU - Dalton, Susanne Oksbjerg

AU - Deltour, Isabelle

AU - Kroman, Niels

AU - Kehlet, Henrik

AU - Rottmann, Nina

AU - Gärtner, Rune

AU - Mitchell, Alex J

AU - Johansen, Christoffer

N1 - Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

PY - 2012

Y1 - 2012

N2 - Objective: Short screening instruments have been suggested to improve the detection of psychological symptoms. We examined the accuracy of the Danish version of the 'Distress Thermometer'. Methods: Between October 2008 and October 2009, 426 women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who were operated at the Breast Surgery Clinic of the Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, were eligible for this study. Of these, 357 participated (84%) and 333 completed a questionnaire. The distress thermometer was evaluated against the 'hospital anxiety and depression scale' (HADS). We also examined the women's wish for referral for psychological support. Results: A cut-off score of 6 vs 7 (low:¿6, high:¿7) on the distress thermometer was optimal for confirming distress, with a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 73%. A cut-off score of 2 vs 3 was optimal for screening, with a sensitivity of 99%, a specificity of 36%, a PPV of 47% and a NPV of 99%. Of those who were distressed using the cut-off score of 2 vs 3 on the distress thermometer, 17% (n = 41) wished to be referred for psychological support and 57% (n = 140) potentially wanted a later referral. Conclusion: The distress thermometer performed satisfactorily relative to the HADS in detecting distress in our study. A screening procedure in which application of the distress thermometer is a first step could be useful for identifying persons in need of support. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

AB - Objective: Short screening instruments have been suggested to improve the detection of psychological symptoms. We examined the accuracy of the Danish version of the 'Distress Thermometer'. Methods: Between October 2008 and October 2009, 426 women with newly diagnosed primary breast cancer who were operated at the Breast Surgery Clinic of the Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, were eligible for this study. Of these, 357 participated (84%) and 333 completed a questionnaire. The distress thermometer was evaluated against the 'hospital anxiety and depression scale' (HADS). We also examined the women's wish for referral for psychological support. Results: A cut-off score of 6 vs 7 (low:¿6, high:¿7) on the distress thermometer was optimal for confirming distress, with a sensitivity of 42%, a specificity of 93%, a positive predictive value (PPV) of 78% and a negative predictive value (NPV) of 73%. A cut-off score of 2 vs 3 was optimal for screening, with a sensitivity of 99%, a specificity of 36%, a PPV of 47% and a NPV of 99%. Of those who were distressed using the cut-off score of 2 vs 3 on the distress thermometer, 17% (n = 41) wished to be referred for psychological support and 57% (n = 140) potentially wanted a later referral. Conclusion: The distress thermometer performed satisfactorily relative to the HADS in detecting distress in our study. A screening procedure in which application of the distress thermometer is a first step could be useful for identifying persons in need of support. Copyright © 2011 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

U2 - 10.1002/pon.1917

DO - 10.1002/pon.1917

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 21280139

VL - 21

SP - 436

EP - 443

JO - Psycho-Oncology

JF - Psycho-Oncology

SN - 1057-9249

IS - 4

ER -