A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Standard

A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors : a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study. / Jensen, Janet F; Egerod, Ingrid; Bestle, Morten H; Christensen, Doris; Elklit, Ask; Hansen, Randi L; Knudsen, Heidi; Grode, Louise B; Overgaard, Dorthe.

I: Intensive Care Medicine, Bind 42, Nr. 11, 11.2016, s. 1733-1743.

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

Harvard

Jensen, JF, Egerod, I, Bestle, MH, Christensen, D, Elklit, A, Hansen, RL, Knudsen, H, Grode, LB & Overgaard, D 2016, 'A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study', Intensive Care Medicine, bind 42, nr. 11, s. 1733-1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1

APA

Jensen, J. F., Egerod, I., Bestle, M. H., Christensen, D., Elklit, A., Hansen, R. L., Knudsen, H., Grode, L. B., & Overgaard, D. (2016). A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study. Intensive Care Medicine, 42(11), 1733-1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1

Vancouver

Jensen JF, Egerod I, Bestle MH, Christensen D, Elklit A, Hansen RL o.a. A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study. Intensive Care Medicine. 2016 nov.;42(11):1733-1743. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1

Author

Jensen, Janet F ; Egerod, Ingrid ; Bestle, Morten H ; Christensen, Doris ; Elklit, Ask ; Hansen, Randi L ; Knudsen, Heidi ; Grode, Louise B ; Overgaard, Dorthe. / A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors : a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study. I: Intensive Care Medicine. 2016 ; Bind 42, Nr. 11. s. 1733-1743.

Bibtex

@article{98ae7bdeb3144e198970a2dbd463406f,
title = "A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors: a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study",
abstract = "PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to test the effectiveness of a post-ICU recovery program compared to standard care during the first year after ICU discharge.METHODS: A pragmatic, non-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group RCT was conducted between December 2012 and December 2015, at ten intensive care units (ICUs) in Denmark. We randomly assigned 386 adult patients (≥18 years) after receiving mechanical ventilation (≥48 h) to standard care (SC) plus a nurse-led intensive care recovery program or standard care alone after ICU discharge (190 intervention, 196 SC). Primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were sense of coherence (SOC), anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessed at 3 and 12 months after ICU discharge including utilization of healthcare services at 12 months.RESULTS: At 12 months, we found no differences in HRQOL between groups (mean difference in the Physical Component Summary score, 1.41 [95 % CI, -1.53 to 4.35; p = 0.35] (n = 235); and in the Mental Component Summary score, 1.92 [95 % CI, -1.06 to 4.90; p = 0.11] (n = 235). No differences were found on self-reported SOC (p = 0.63), anxiety (p = 0.68), depression (p = 0.67), PTSD (p = 0.27), or the utilization of healthcare services including rehabilitation. We found a difference on anxiety, when a cut-off point ≥11 was applied, in per protocol analysis of complete cases at 3 months favoring the intervention (8.8 % vs. 16.2 %, p = 0.04).CONCLUSIONS: The tested recovery program was not superior to standard care during the first 12 months post-ICU.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, identification no. NCT01721239.",
keywords = "Journal Article",
author = "Jensen, {Janet F} and Ingrid Egerod and Bestle, {Morten H} and Doris Christensen and Ask Elklit and Hansen, {Randi L} and Heidi Knudsen and Grode, {Louise B} and Dorthe Overgaard",
year = "2016",
month = nov,
doi = "10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1",
language = "English",
volume = "42",
pages = "1733--1743",
journal = "European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine",
issn = "0935-1701",
publisher = "Springer",
number = "11",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A recovery program to improve quality of life, sense of coherence and psychological health in ICU survivors

T2 - a multicenter randomized controlled trial, the RAPIT study

AU - Jensen, Janet F

AU - Egerod, Ingrid

AU - Bestle, Morten H

AU - Christensen, Doris

AU - Elklit, Ask

AU - Hansen, Randi L

AU - Knudsen, Heidi

AU - Grode, Louise B

AU - Overgaard, Dorthe

PY - 2016/11

Y1 - 2016/11

N2 - PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to test the effectiveness of a post-ICU recovery program compared to standard care during the first year after ICU discharge.METHODS: A pragmatic, non-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group RCT was conducted between December 2012 and December 2015, at ten intensive care units (ICUs) in Denmark. We randomly assigned 386 adult patients (≥18 years) after receiving mechanical ventilation (≥48 h) to standard care (SC) plus a nurse-led intensive care recovery program or standard care alone after ICU discharge (190 intervention, 196 SC). Primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were sense of coherence (SOC), anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessed at 3 and 12 months after ICU discharge including utilization of healthcare services at 12 months.RESULTS: At 12 months, we found no differences in HRQOL between groups (mean difference in the Physical Component Summary score, 1.41 [95 % CI, -1.53 to 4.35; p = 0.35] (n = 235); and in the Mental Component Summary score, 1.92 [95 % CI, -1.06 to 4.90; p = 0.11] (n = 235). No differences were found on self-reported SOC (p = 0.63), anxiety (p = 0.68), depression (p = 0.67), PTSD (p = 0.27), or the utilization of healthcare services including rehabilitation. We found a difference on anxiety, when a cut-off point ≥11 was applied, in per protocol analysis of complete cases at 3 months favoring the intervention (8.8 % vs. 16.2 %, p = 0.04).CONCLUSIONS: The tested recovery program was not superior to standard care during the first 12 months post-ICU.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, identification no. NCT01721239.

AB - PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized controlled trial (RCT) was to test the effectiveness of a post-ICU recovery program compared to standard care during the first year after ICU discharge.METHODS: A pragmatic, non-blinded, multicenter, parallel-group RCT was conducted between December 2012 and December 2015, at ten intensive care units (ICUs) in Denmark. We randomly assigned 386 adult patients (≥18 years) after receiving mechanical ventilation (≥48 h) to standard care (SC) plus a nurse-led intensive care recovery program or standard care alone after ICU discharge (190 intervention, 196 SC). Primary outcome was health-related quality of life (HRQOL) at 12 months. Secondary outcomes were sense of coherence (SOC), anxiety, depression, and post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) assessed at 3 and 12 months after ICU discharge including utilization of healthcare services at 12 months.RESULTS: At 12 months, we found no differences in HRQOL between groups (mean difference in the Physical Component Summary score, 1.41 [95 % CI, -1.53 to 4.35; p = 0.35] (n = 235); and in the Mental Component Summary score, 1.92 [95 % CI, -1.06 to 4.90; p = 0.11] (n = 235). No differences were found on self-reported SOC (p = 0.63), anxiety (p = 0.68), depression (p = 0.67), PTSD (p = 0.27), or the utilization of healthcare services including rehabilitation. We found a difference on anxiety, when a cut-off point ≥11 was applied, in per protocol analysis of complete cases at 3 months favoring the intervention (8.8 % vs. 16.2 %, p = 0.04).CONCLUSIONS: The tested recovery program was not superior to standard care during the first 12 months post-ICU.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The trial is registered at Clinicaltrials.gov, identification no. NCT01721239.

KW - Journal Article

U2 - 10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1

DO - 10.1007/s00134-016-4522-1

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27695894

VL - 42

SP - 1733

EP - 1743

JO - European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

JF - European Journal of Intensive Care Medicine

SN - 0935-1701

IS - 11

ER -

ID: 176865354