A Comparison of the effects of preterm birth and institutional deprivation on child temperament

Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskriftTidsskriftartikelForskningfagfællebedømt

  • Lucia Miranda Reyes
  • Jäkel, Julia
  • Jana Kreppner
  • Dieter Wolke
  • Edmund Sonuga-Barke

Both preterm birth and early institutional deprivation are associated with neurodevelopmental impairment - with both shared and distinctive features. To explore shared underlying mechanisms, this study directly compared the effects of these putative risk factors on temperament profiles in six-year-olds: Children born very preterm (<32 weeks gestation) or at very low birthweight (<1500 g) from the Bavarian Longitudinal Study (n = 299); and children who experienced >6 months of deprivation in Romanian institutions from the English and Romanian Adoptees Study (n = 101). The former were compared with 311 healthy term born controls and the latter with 52 nondeprived adoptees. At 6 years, temperament was assessed via parent reports across 5 dimensions: effortful control, activity, shyness, emotionality, and sociability. Very preterm/very low birthweight and postinstitutionalized children showed similarly aberrant profiles in terms of lower effortful control, preterm = -0.50, 95% CI [-0.67, -0.33]; postinstitutionalized = -0.48, 95% CI [-0.82, -0.14], compared with their respective controls. Additionally, postinstitutionalized children showed higher activity, whereas very preterm/very low birthweight children showed lower shyness. Preterm birth and early institutionalization are similarly associated with poorer effortful control, which might contribute to long-term vulnerability. More research is needed to examine temperamental processes as common mediators of negative long-term outcomes following early adversity.

OriginalsprogEngelsk
TidsskriftDevelopment and Psychopathology
Vol/bind32
Udgave nummer4
Sider (fra-til)1524-1533
Antal sider10
ISSN0954-5794
DOI
StatusUdgivet - 1 okt. 2020
Eksternt udgivetJa

Bibliografisk note

Funding Information:
Acknowledgments. We thank all group members, pediatricians, psychologists, and research nurses in the Bavarian Longitudinal Study and English and Romanian Adoptees Study. We are especially thankful to all study participants and their families. Data collection in the Bavarian Longitudinal Study was supported by grants PKE24, JUG14, 01EP9504, and 01ER0801 from the German Federal Ministry of Education and Science (BMBF). Data collection in the English and Romanian Adoptees Study was supported by grants 3700295 from the UK Medical Research Council and OPD/00248/G from the UK Department of Health.

Publisher Copyright:
© Cambridge University Press 2019.

ID: 393158789