"What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

"What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes. / Wang, Qian (Janice); Woods, Andy T.; Spence, Charles.

In: i-Perception, Vol. 6, No. 6, 2015, p. 1-23.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Wang, QJ, Woods, AT & Spence, C 2015, '"What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes', i-Perception, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515622001

APA

Wang, Q. J., Woods, A. T., & Spence, C. (2015). "What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes. i-Perception, 6(6), 1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515622001

Vancouver

Wang QJ, Woods AT, Spence C. "What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes. i-Perception. 2015;6(6):1-23. https://doi.org/10.1177/2041669515622001

Author

Wang, Qian (Janice) ; Woods, Andy T. ; Spence, Charles. / "What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes. In: i-Perception. 2015 ; Vol. 6, No. 6. pp. 1-23.

Bibtex

@article{4317a0eaff664eeb8254bbef1d1c4c1c,
title = "{"}What's your taste in music?{"} a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes",
abstract = "We report on the results of two online experiments designed to compare different soundtracks that had been composed (by various researchers and sound designers) in order to evoke/match different basic tastes. In Experiment 1, 100 participants listened to samples from 24 soundtracks and chose the taste (sweet, sour, salty, or bitter) that best matched each sample. Overall, the sweet soundtracks most effectively evoked the taste intended by the composer (participants chose sweet 56.9% of the time for the sweet soundtracks), whereas the bitter soundtracks were the least effective (participants chose bitter 31.4% of the time for the bitter soundtracks), compared with chance (choosing any specific taste 25% of the time). In Experiment 2, 50 participants rated their emotional responses (in terms of pleasantness and arousal) to the same 24 soundtrack samples and also to imaginary sweet/sour/salty/bitter-tasting foods. Associations between soundtracks and tastes were partly mediated by pleasantness for the sweet and bitter tastes and partly by arousal for the sour tastes. These results demonstrate how emotion mediation may be an additional mechanism behind sound-taste correspondences.",
keywords = "Crossmodal correspondences, Emotion mediation, Internet-based testing, Soundtracks, Taste",
author = "Wang, {Qian (Janice)} and Woods, {Andy T.} and Charles Spence",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} The Author(s) 2015.",
year = "2015",
doi = "10.1177/2041669515622001",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1--23",
journal = "i-Perception",
issn = "2041-6695",
publisher = "SAGE Publications",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - "What's your taste in music?" a comparison of the effectiveness of various soundscapes in evoking specific tastes

AU - Wang, Qian (Janice)

AU - Woods, Andy T.

AU - Spence, Charles

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2015.

PY - 2015

Y1 - 2015

N2 - We report on the results of two online experiments designed to compare different soundtracks that had been composed (by various researchers and sound designers) in order to evoke/match different basic tastes. In Experiment 1, 100 participants listened to samples from 24 soundtracks and chose the taste (sweet, sour, salty, or bitter) that best matched each sample. Overall, the sweet soundtracks most effectively evoked the taste intended by the composer (participants chose sweet 56.9% of the time for the sweet soundtracks), whereas the bitter soundtracks were the least effective (participants chose bitter 31.4% of the time for the bitter soundtracks), compared with chance (choosing any specific taste 25% of the time). In Experiment 2, 50 participants rated their emotional responses (in terms of pleasantness and arousal) to the same 24 soundtrack samples and also to imaginary sweet/sour/salty/bitter-tasting foods. Associations between soundtracks and tastes were partly mediated by pleasantness for the sweet and bitter tastes and partly by arousal for the sour tastes. These results demonstrate how emotion mediation may be an additional mechanism behind sound-taste correspondences.

AB - We report on the results of two online experiments designed to compare different soundtracks that had been composed (by various researchers and sound designers) in order to evoke/match different basic tastes. In Experiment 1, 100 participants listened to samples from 24 soundtracks and chose the taste (sweet, sour, salty, or bitter) that best matched each sample. Overall, the sweet soundtracks most effectively evoked the taste intended by the composer (participants chose sweet 56.9% of the time for the sweet soundtracks), whereas the bitter soundtracks were the least effective (participants chose bitter 31.4% of the time for the bitter soundtracks), compared with chance (choosing any specific taste 25% of the time). In Experiment 2, 50 participants rated their emotional responses (in terms of pleasantness and arousal) to the same 24 soundtrack samples and also to imaginary sweet/sour/salty/bitter-tasting foods. Associations between soundtracks and tastes were partly mediated by pleasantness for the sweet and bitter tastes and partly by arousal for the sour tastes. These results demonstrate how emotion mediation may be an additional mechanism behind sound-taste correspondences.

KW - Crossmodal correspondences

KW - Emotion mediation

KW - Internet-based testing

KW - Soundtracks

KW - Taste

U2 - 10.1177/2041669515622001

DO - 10.1177/2041669515622001

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:84952658519

VL - 6

SP - 1

EP - 23

JO - i-Perception

JF - i-Perception

SN - 2041-6695

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 375020664