To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability. / Raffalt, Peter C.; Kent, Jenny A.; Wurdeman, Shane R.; Stergiou, Nick.

In: Journal of Experimental Biology, Vol. 223, No. 13, jeb224113, 2020.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Raffalt, PC, Kent, JA, Wurdeman, SR & Stergiou, N 2020, 'To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability', Journal of Experimental Biology, vol. 223, no. 13, jeb224113. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.224113

APA

Raffalt, P. C., Kent, J. A., Wurdeman, S. R., & Stergiou, N. (2020). To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability. Journal of Experimental Biology, 223(13), [jeb224113]. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.224113

Vancouver

Raffalt PC, Kent JA, Wurdeman SR, Stergiou N. To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2020;223(13). jeb224113. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.224113

Author

Raffalt, Peter C. ; Kent, Jenny A. ; Wurdeman, Shane R. ; Stergiou, Nick. / To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability. In: Journal of Experimental Biology. 2020 ; Vol. 223, No. 13.

Bibtex

@article{81c5ae0f705948ebab1cf462c22acda2,
title = "To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability",
abstract = "During locomotion, humans change gait mode between walking and running as locomotion speed is either increased or decreased. Dynamical systems theory predicts that the self-organization of coordinated motor behaviors dictates the transition from one distinct stable attractor behavior to another distinct attractor behavior (e.g. walk to run or vice versa) as the speed is changed. To evaluate this prediction, the present study investigated the attractor stability of walking and running across a range of speeds evoking both self-selected gait mode and non-self-selected gait mode. Eleven subjects completed treadmill walking for 3 min at 0.89, 1.12, 1.34, 1.56, 1.79, 2.01, 2.24 and 2.46 m s−1 and running for 3 min at 1.79, 2.01, 2.24, 2.46, 2.68, 2.91, 3.13 and 3.35 m s−1 in randomized order while lower limb joint angles and sacrum displacements was recorded. Attractor stability was quantified by continuous relative phase and deviation phase of lower limb segment angles, and the largest Lyapunov exponent, correlation dimension and movement variability of the sacrum marker displacement and the hip, knee and ankle joint angles. Lower limb attractor stability during walking was maximized at speeds close to the self-selected preferred walking speed and increased during running as speed was increased. Furthermore, lower limb attractor stability was highest at a particular gait mode closest to the corresponding preferred speed, in support of the prediction of dynamical systems theory. This was not the case for the sacrum displacement attractor, suggesting that lower limb attractor behavior provides a more appropriate order parameter compared with sacrum displacement.",
keywords = "Coordination, Dynamical system theory, Dynamics, Gait, Locomotion",
author = "Raffalt, {Peter C.} and Kent, {Jenny A.} and Wurdeman, {Shane R.} and Nick Stergiou",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1242/jeb.224113",
language = "English",
volume = "223",
journal = "Journal of Experimental Biology",
issn = "0022-0949",
publisher = "The/Company of Biologists Ltd.",
number = "13",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - To walk or to run – a question of movement attractor stability

AU - Raffalt, Peter C.

AU - Kent, Jenny A.

AU - Wurdeman, Shane R.

AU - Stergiou, Nick

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2020. Published by The Company of Biologists Ltd.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - During locomotion, humans change gait mode between walking and running as locomotion speed is either increased or decreased. Dynamical systems theory predicts that the self-organization of coordinated motor behaviors dictates the transition from one distinct stable attractor behavior to another distinct attractor behavior (e.g. walk to run or vice versa) as the speed is changed. To evaluate this prediction, the present study investigated the attractor stability of walking and running across a range of speeds evoking both self-selected gait mode and non-self-selected gait mode. Eleven subjects completed treadmill walking for 3 min at 0.89, 1.12, 1.34, 1.56, 1.79, 2.01, 2.24 and 2.46 m s−1 and running for 3 min at 1.79, 2.01, 2.24, 2.46, 2.68, 2.91, 3.13 and 3.35 m s−1 in randomized order while lower limb joint angles and sacrum displacements was recorded. Attractor stability was quantified by continuous relative phase and deviation phase of lower limb segment angles, and the largest Lyapunov exponent, correlation dimension and movement variability of the sacrum marker displacement and the hip, knee and ankle joint angles. Lower limb attractor stability during walking was maximized at speeds close to the self-selected preferred walking speed and increased during running as speed was increased. Furthermore, lower limb attractor stability was highest at a particular gait mode closest to the corresponding preferred speed, in support of the prediction of dynamical systems theory. This was not the case for the sacrum displacement attractor, suggesting that lower limb attractor behavior provides a more appropriate order parameter compared with sacrum displacement.

AB - During locomotion, humans change gait mode between walking and running as locomotion speed is either increased or decreased. Dynamical systems theory predicts that the self-organization of coordinated motor behaviors dictates the transition from one distinct stable attractor behavior to another distinct attractor behavior (e.g. walk to run or vice versa) as the speed is changed. To evaluate this prediction, the present study investigated the attractor stability of walking and running across a range of speeds evoking both self-selected gait mode and non-self-selected gait mode. Eleven subjects completed treadmill walking for 3 min at 0.89, 1.12, 1.34, 1.56, 1.79, 2.01, 2.24 and 2.46 m s−1 and running for 3 min at 1.79, 2.01, 2.24, 2.46, 2.68, 2.91, 3.13 and 3.35 m s−1 in randomized order while lower limb joint angles and sacrum displacements was recorded. Attractor stability was quantified by continuous relative phase and deviation phase of lower limb segment angles, and the largest Lyapunov exponent, correlation dimension and movement variability of the sacrum marker displacement and the hip, knee and ankle joint angles. Lower limb attractor stability during walking was maximized at speeds close to the self-selected preferred walking speed and increased during running as speed was increased. Furthermore, lower limb attractor stability was highest at a particular gait mode closest to the corresponding preferred speed, in support of the prediction of dynamical systems theory. This was not the case for the sacrum displacement attractor, suggesting that lower limb attractor behavior provides a more appropriate order parameter compared with sacrum displacement.

KW - Coordination

KW - Dynamical system theory

KW - Dynamics

KW - Gait

KW - Locomotion

U2 - 10.1242/jeb.224113

DO - 10.1242/jeb.224113

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32527966

AN - SCOPUS:85087528840

VL - 223

JO - Journal of Experimental Biology

JF - Journal of Experimental Biology

SN - 0022-0949

IS - 13

M1 - jeb224113

ER -

ID: 367292749