The Positivism Paradigm of Research

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Positivism Paradigm of Research. / Park, Yoon Soo; Konge, Lars; Artino, Anthony R.

In: Academic Medicine, Vol. 95, No. 5, 2020, p. 690-694.

Research output: Contribution to journalReviewResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Park, YS, Konge, L & Artino, AR 2020, 'The Positivism Paradigm of Research', Academic Medicine, vol. 95, no. 5, pp. 690-694. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

APA

Park, Y. S., Konge, L., & Artino, A. R. (2020). The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Academic Medicine, 95(5), 690-694. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

Vancouver

Park YS, Konge L, Artino AR. The Positivism Paradigm of Research. Academic Medicine. 2020;95(5):690-694. https://doi.org/10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

Author

Park, Yoon Soo ; Konge, Lars ; Artino, Anthony R. / The Positivism Paradigm of Research. In: Academic Medicine. 2020 ; Vol. 95, No. 5. pp. 690-694.

Bibtex

@article{5beb25a46159468eb07bc935dc462771,
title = "The Positivism Paradigm of Research",
abstract = "Research paradigms guide scientific discoveries through their assumptions and principles. Understanding paradigm-specific assumptions helps illuminate the quality of findings that support scientific studies and identify gaps in generating sound evidence. This article focuses on the research paradigm of positivism, examining its definition, history, and assumptions (ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology, and rigor). Positivism is aligned with the hypothetico-deductive model of science that builds on verifying a priori hypotheses and experimentation by operationalizing variables and measures; results from hypothesis testing are used to inform and advance science. Studies aligned with positivism generally focus on identifying explanatory associations or causal relationships through quantitative approaches, where empirically based findings from large sample sizes are favored - in this regard, generalizable inferences, replication of findings, and controlled experimentation have been principles guiding positivist science. Criteria for evaluating the quality of positivist research are discussed. An example from health professions education is provided to guide positivist thinking in study design and implementation.",
author = "Park, {Yoon Soo} and Lars Konge and Artino, {Anthony R.}",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093",
language = "English",
volume = "95",
pages = "690--694",
journal = "Academic Medicine",
issn = "1040-2446",
publisher = "Lippincott Williams & Wilkins",
number = "5",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Positivism Paradigm of Research

AU - Park, Yoon Soo

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Artino, Anthony R.

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Research paradigms guide scientific discoveries through their assumptions and principles. Understanding paradigm-specific assumptions helps illuminate the quality of findings that support scientific studies and identify gaps in generating sound evidence. This article focuses on the research paradigm of positivism, examining its definition, history, and assumptions (ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology, and rigor). Positivism is aligned with the hypothetico-deductive model of science that builds on verifying a priori hypotheses and experimentation by operationalizing variables and measures; results from hypothesis testing are used to inform and advance science. Studies aligned with positivism generally focus on identifying explanatory associations or causal relationships through quantitative approaches, where empirically based findings from large sample sizes are favored - in this regard, generalizable inferences, replication of findings, and controlled experimentation have been principles guiding positivist science. Criteria for evaluating the quality of positivist research are discussed. An example from health professions education is provided to guide positivist thinking in study design and implementation.

AB - Research paradigms guide scientific discoveries through their assumptions and principles. Understanding paradigm-specific assumptions helps illuminate the quality of findings that support scientific studies and identify gaps in generating sound evidence. This article focuses on the research paradigm of positivism, examining its definition, history, and assumptions (ontology, epistemology, axiology, methodology, and rigor). Positivism is aligned with the hypothetico-deductive model of science that builds on verifying a priori hypotheses and experimentation by operationalizing variables and measures; results from hypothesis testing are used to inform and advance science. Studies aligned with positivism generally focus on identifying explanatory associations or causal relationships through quantitative approaches, where empirically based findings from large sample sizes are favored - in this regard, generalizable inferences, replication of findings, and controlled experimentation have been principles guiding positivist science. Criteria for evaluating the quality of positivist research are discussed. An example from health professions education is provided to guide positivist thinking in study design and implementation.

U2 - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

DO - 10.1097/ACM.0000000000003093

M3 - Review

C2 - 31789841

AN - SCOPUS:85084152395

VL - 95

SP - 690

EP - 694

JO - Academic Medicine

JF - Academic Medicine

SN - 1040-2446

IS - 5

ER -

ID: 258377902