The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model. / Hemmati, Azad; Rahmani, Fateh; Bach, Bo.

In: Frontiers in Psychiatry, Vol. 12, 635813, 30.03.2021.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hemmati, A, Rahmani, F & Bach, B 2021, 'The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model', Frontiers in Psychiatry, vol. 12, 635813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813

APA

Hemmati, A., Rahmani, F., & Bach, B. (2021). The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model. Frontiers in Psychiatry, 12, [635813]. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813

Vancouver

Hemmati A, Rahmani F, Bach B. The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model. Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021 Mar 30;12. 635813. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813

Author

Hemmati, Azad ; Rahmani, Fateh ; Bach, Bo. / The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model. In: Frontiers in Psychiatry. 2021 ; Vol. 12.

Bibtex

@article{804093780810498cb2068d40d49c9d48,
title = "The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model",
abstract = "The ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) operate with trait domains that contribute to the individual expression of personality disturbance (i.e., negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism). To date, these trait frameworks have not been investigated sufficiently in Middle Eastern cultures. Thus, the present study explored the structure of the ICD-11 and AMPD personality disorder (PD) trait domains in a large mixed sample from the Kurdistan zone of Iran. The ICD-11 and AMPD trait domains were operationalized using empirically supported algorithms for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The PID-5 was administered to a large mixed sample (N = 3,196) composed of 2,678 community and 518 clinical participants. Structural validity was investigated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), whereas differential construct validity was explored by comparing clinical and community scores. Model fit and the expected factor structure were deemed appropriate for the ICD-11 trait model, but less adequate for the DSM-5 trait model (i.e., disinhibition did not emerge as a separate factor). All domain and facet scores showed significant differences between clinical and community subsamples with moderate to large effects, mostly for disinhibition and dissociality/antagonism while least for anankastia. The findings of the present study may suggest that the ICD-11 trait model is more cross-culturally fitting than the DSM-5 AMPD trait model, at least with respect to a large mixed sample from the region of Kurdistan. Accordingly, there is evidence for using PID-5 data for WHO ICD-11 purposes in this part of the World.",
keywords = "alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD), Anankastia, compulsivity, DSM-5, ICD-11, personality disorder, personality trait, PID-5",
author = "Azad Hemmati and Fateh Rahmani and Bo Bach",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Copyright {\textcopyright} 2021 Hemmati, Rahmani and Bach.",
year = "2021",
month = mar,
day = "30",
doi = "10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813",
language = "English",
volume = "12",
journal = "Frontiers in Psychiatry",
issn = "1664-0640",
publisher = "Frontiers Research Foundation",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The ICD-11 Personality Disorder Trait Model Fits the Kurdish Population Better Than the DSM-5 Trait Model

AU - Hemmati, Azad

AU - Rahmani, Fateh

AU - Bach, Bo

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright © 2021 Hemmati, Rahmani and Bach.

PY - 2021/3/30

Y1 - 2021/3/30

N2 - The ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) operate with trait domains that contribute to the individual expression of personality disturbance (i.e., negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism). To date, these trait frameworks have not been investigated sufficiently in Middle Eastern cultures. Thus, the present study explored the structure of the ICD-11 and AMPD personality disorder (PD) trait domains in a large mixed sample from the Kurdistan zone of Iran. The ICD-11 and AMPD trait domains were operationalized using empirically supported algorithms for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The PID-5 was administered to a large mixed sample (N = 3,196) composed of 2,678 community and 518 clinical participants. Structural validity was investigated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), whereas differential construct validity was explored by comparing clinical and community scores. Model fit and the expected factor structure were deemed appropriate for the ICD-11 trait model, but less adequate for the DSM-5 trait model (i.e., disinhibition did not emerge as a separate factor). All domain and facet scores showed significant differences between clinical and community subsamples with moderate to large effects, mostly for disinhibition and dissociality/antagonism while least for anankastia. The findings of the present study may suggest that the ICD-11 trait model is more cross-culturally fitting than the DSM-5 AMPD trait model, at least with respect to a large mixed sample from the region of Kurdistan. Accordingly, there is evidence for using PID-5 data for WHO ICD-11 purposes in this part of the World.

AB - The ICD-11 Classification of Personality Disorders and the DSM-5 Alternative Model of Personality Disorders (AMPD) operate with trait domains that contribute to the individual expression of personality disturbance (i.e., negative affectivity, detachment, dissociality, disinhibition, anankastia, and psychoticism). To date, these trait frameworks have not been investigated sufficiently in Middle Eastern cultures. Thus, the present study explored the structure of the ICD-11 and AMPD personality disorder (PD) trait domains in a large mixed sample from the Kurdistan zone of Iran. The ICD-11 and AMPD trait domains were operationalized using empirically supported algorithms for the Personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5). The PID-5 was administered to a large mixed sample (N = 3,196) composed of 2,678 community and 518 clinical participants. Structural validity was investigated using Exploratory Factor Analysis (EFA), whereas differential construct validity was explored by comparing clinical and community scores. Model fit and the expected factor structure were deemed appropriate for the ICD-11 trait model, but less adequate for the DSM-5 trait model (i.e., disinhibition did not emerge as a separate factor). All domain and facet scores showed significant differences between clinical and community subsamples with moderate to large effects, mostly for disinhibition and dissociality/antagonism while least for anankastia. The findings of the present study may suggest that the ICD-11 trait model is more cross-culturally fitting than the DSM-5 AMPD trait model, at least with respect to a large mixed sample from the region of Kurdistan. Accordingly, there is evidence for using PID-5 data for WHO ICD-11 purposes in this part of the World.

KW - alternative model of personality disorders (AMPD)

KW - Anankastia

KW - compulsivity

KW - DSM-5

KW - ICD-11

KW - personality disorder

KW - personality trait

KW - PID-5

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85104045372&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813

DO - 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.635813

M3 - Journal article

AN - SCOPUS:85104045372

VL - 12

JO - Frontiers in Psychiatry

JF - Frontiers in Psychiatry

SN - 1664-0640

M1 - 635813

ER -

ID: 365566649