The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion. / Hindhede, Anette Lykke.

In: Sociological Research Online, Vol. 23, No. 3, 2018.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hindhede, AL 2018, 'The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion', Sociological Research Online, vol. 23, no. 3. https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769669

APA

Hindhede, A. L. (2018). The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion. Sociological Research Online, 23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769669

Vancouver

Hindhede AL. The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion. Sociological Research Online. 2018;23(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/1360780418769669

Author

Hindhede, Anette Lykke. / The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion. In: Sociological Research Online. 2018 ; Vol. 23, No. 3.

Bibtex

@article{3c03121e1aa149d09c986bc3bb5655d8,
title = "The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion",
abstract = "There has been a tremendous rise in media coverage and medical research on the rapid increase of so-called non-communicable diseases. Such diseases have apparently reached epidemic proportions worldwide. In this article, I argue for the fruitfulness of investigating the communicable aspect of non-communicable diseases from a distinct sociological view of non-communicable diseases as infectious. I conduct a historical anamnesis of sociological theories that inform contemporary sociological thinking about contagion and/or collective action and the social clustering of (health) behaviour, with a particular focus on the notions of imitation, suggestion, and habitus formation. I argue that the notion of contagion is not only about biology but also about being actualised by lifestyle diseases. Based on the seminal work of Philip Strong on epidemic psychology, I discuss how – in dealing with the present threat to public order – a societal reaction in terms of a profound sense of public alarm and the generation of an outbreak of control strategies has emerged as another powerful epidemic or moral panic challenged by how to isolate the source of {\textquoteleft}infection{\textquoteright}. The article concludes by asserting that there still very much remains a divide between the paradigms of the individual and the social in the production of scientific knowledge about these diseases and causality. Considering health-related risk behaviour as a socially organised rather than an individual phenomenon provides more useful data for public health interventions aimed at changing health lifestyles.",
author = "Hindhede, {Anette Lykke}",
year = "2018",
doi = "10.1177/1360780418769669",
language = "English",
volume = "23",
journal = "Sociological Research Online",
issn = "1360-7804",
publisher = "Sociological Research Online",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The Communicability of Non-Communicable Diseases: An Overview of Sociological Contributions to Ideas of Contagion

AU - Hindhede, Anette Lykke

PY - 2018

Y1 - 2018

N2 - There has been a tremendous rise in media coverage and medical research on the rapid increase of so-called non-communicable diseases. Such diseases have apparently reached epidemic proportions worldwide. In this article, I argue for the fruitfulness of investigating the communicable aspect of non-communicable diseases from a distinct sociological view of non-communicable diseases as infectious. I conduct a historical anamnesis of sociological theories that inform contemporary sociological thinking about contagion and/or collective action and the social clustering of (health) behaviour, with a particular focus on the notions of imitation, suggestion, and habitus formation. I argue that the notion of contagion is not only about biology but also about being actualised by lifestyle diseases. Based on the seminal work of Philip Strong on epidemic psychology, I discuss how – in dealing with the present threat to public order – a societal reaction in terms of a profound sense of public alarm and the generation of an outbreak of control strategies has emerged as another powerful epidemic or moral panic challenged by how to isolate the source of ‘infection’. The article concludes by asserting that there still very much remains a divide between the paradigms of the individual and the social in the production of scientific knowledge about these diseases and causality. Considering health-related risk behaviour as a socially organised rather than an individual phenomenon provides more useful data for public health interventions aimed at changing health lifestyles.

AB - There has been a tremendous rise in media coverage and medical research on the rapid increase of so-called non-communicable diseases. Such diseases have apparently reached epidemic proportions worldwide. In this article, I argue for the fruitfulness of investigating the communicable aspect of non-communicable diseases from a distinct sociological view of non-communicable diseases as infectious. I conduct a historical anamnesis of sociological theories that inform contemporary sociological thinking about contagion and/or collective action and the social clustering of (health) behaviour, with a particular focus on the notions of imitation, suggestion, and habitus formation. I argue that the notion of contagion is not only about biology but also about being actualised by lifestyle diseases. Based on the seminal work of Philip Strong on epidemic psychology, I discuss how – in dealing with the present threat to public order – a societal reaction in terms of a profound sense of public alarm and the generation of an outbreak of control strategies has emerged as another powerful epidemic or moral panic challenged by how to isolate the source of ‘infection’. The article concludes by asserting that there still very much remains a divide between the paradigms of the individual and the social in the production of scientific knowledge about these diseases and causality. Considering health-related risk behaviour as a socially organised rather than an individual phenomenon provides more useful data for public health interventions aimed at changing health lifestyles.

U2 - 10.1177/1360780418769669

DO - 10.1177/1360780418769669

M3 - Journal article

VL - 23

JO - Sociological Research Online

JF - Sociological Research Online

SN - 1360-7804

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 317083730