The "brother layer problem": Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

The "brother layer problem" : Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry. / Rutt, Rebecca Leigh; Jakobsen, Jostein.

In: Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, Vol. 6, No. 3, 2023, p. 1785-1803.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Rutt, RL & Jakobsen, J 2023, 'The "brother layer problem": Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry', Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, vol. 6, no. 3, pp. 1785-1803. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221131195

APA

Rutt, R. L., & Jakobsen, J. (2023). The "brother layer problem": Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space, 6(3), 1785-1803. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221131195

Vancouver

Rutt RL, Jakobsen J. The "brother layer problem": Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry. Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. 2023;6(3):1785-1803. https://doi.org/10.1177/25148486221131195

Author

Rutt, Rebecca Leigh ; Jakobsen, Jostein. / The "brother layer problem" : Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry. In: Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space. 2023 ; Vol. 6, No. 3. pp. 1785-1803.

Bibtex

@article{1505212e03b545c4978a8f03fa518f96,
title = "The {"}brother layer problem{"}: Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of {\textquoteleft}ethical sustainability{\textquoteright} in industrial poultry",
abstract = "The global poultry industry culls approximately seven billion day-old male layer chicks annually. Superfluous to both egg and meat, male {\textquoteleft}brother{\textquoteright} layers constitute a momentous problem, simultaneously economical and ethical, to the poultry industry. In this article, we scrutinize present and proposed alternatives to routine killing involving multiple biotechnological innovations, including novel methods for fetus sexing, genome editing technologies and re-sexing. We utilize a political ecological perspective that views attempts to solve the {\textquoteleft}brother layer problem{\textquoteright} as discursive and techno-scientific {\textquoteleft}fixes{\textquoteright} to problems of the capitalist poultry industry's own making and to rising demands for ethics and environmental-friendly animal agriculture. This context opens new avenues for profit-making by and for an expanding matrix of actors we view as an evolving {\textquoteleft}economy of repair{\textquoteright} that is built in part by public resources. Further, these fixes constitute an ostensible {\textquoteleft}ethical sustainability{\textquoteright} meant to signal both animal welfare and environmental improvements, which seem to work towards stabilizing agro-industry, thereby foreclosing alternatives to agro-industrial intensification.",
author = "Rutt, {Rebecca Leigh} and Jostein Jakobsen",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1177/25148486221131195",
language = "English",
volume = "6",
pages = "1785--1803",
journal = "Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space",
issn = "2514-8486",
publisher = "Sage Journals",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - The "brother layer problem"

T2 - Routine killing, biotechnology and the pursuit of ‘ethical sustainability’ in industrial poultry

AU - Rutt, Rebecca Leigh

AU - Jakobsen, Jostein

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - The global poultry industry culls approximately seven billion day-old male layer chicks annually. Superfluous to both egg and meat, male ‘brother’ layers constitute a momentous problem, simultaneously economical and ethical, to the poultry industry. In this article, we scrutinize present and proposed alternatives to routine killing involving multiple biotechnological innovations, including novel methods for fetus sexing, genome editing technologies and re-sexing. We utilize a political ecological perspective that views attempts to solve the ‘brother layer problem’ as discursive and techno-scientific ‘fixes’ to problems of the capitalist poultry industry's own making and to rising demands for ethics and environmental-friendly animal agriculture. This context opens new avenues for profit-making by and for an expanding matrix of actors we view as an evolving ‘economy of repair’ that is built in part by public resources. Further, these fixes constitute an ostensible ‘ethical sustainability’ meant to signal both animal welfare and environmental improvements, which seem to work towards stabilizing agro-industry, thereby foreclosing alternatives to agro-industrial intensification.

AB - The global poultry industry culls approximately seven billion day-old male layer chicks annually. Superfluous to both egg and meat, male ‘brother’ layers constitute a momentous problem, simultaneously economical and ethical, to the poultry industry. In this article, we scrutinize present and proposed alternatives to routine killing involving multiple biotechnological innovations, including novel methods for fetus sexing, genome editing technologies and re-sexing. We utilize a political ecological perspective that views attempts to solve the ‘brother layer problem’ as discursive and techno-scientific ‘fixes’ to problems of the capitalist poultry industry's own making and to rising demands for ethics and environmental-friendly animal agriculture. This context opens new avenues for profit-making by and for an expanding matrix of actors we view as an evolving ‘economy of repair’ that is built in part by public resources. Further, these fixes constitute an ostensible ‘ethical sustainability’ meant to signal both animal welfare and environmental improvements, which seem to work towards stabilizing agro-industry, thereby foreclosing alternatives to agro-industrial intensification.

U2 - 10.1177/25148486221131195

DO - 10.1177/25148486221131195

M3 - Journal article

VL - 6

SP - 1785

EP - 1803

JO - Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

JF - Environment and Planning E: Nature and Space

SN - 2514-8486

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 323546011