Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center. / Fernebro, J; Engellau, J; Persson, A; Rydholm, A; Nilbert, Mef.

In: A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, Vol. 115, No. 6, 2007, p. 707-12.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Fernebro, J, Engellau, J, Persson, A, Rydholm, A & Nilbert, M 2007, 'Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center', A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, vol. 115, no. 6, pp. 707-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_650.x

APA

Fernebro, J., Engellau, J., Persson, A., Rydholm, A., & Nilbert, M. (2007). Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center. A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica, 115(6), 707-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_650.x

Vancouver

Fernebro J, Engellau J, Persson A, Rydholm A, Nilbert M. Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center. A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica. 2007;115(6):707-12. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_650.x

Author

Fernebro, J ; Engellau, J ; Persson, A ; Rydholm, A ; Nilbert, Mef. / Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center. In: A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica. 2007 ; Vol. 115, No. 6. pp. 707-12.

Bibtex

@article{90f72c40731f42c6b02dbb49bbeb4554,
title = "Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center",
abstract = "Soft tissue sarcomas often present as large and histopathologically heterogenous tumors. Proliferation has repeatedly been identified as a prognostic factor and immunostaining for Ki-67 represents the most commonly used proliferation marker. There is, however, a lack of consensus on how to evaluate Ki-67 staining regarding optimal cut-off levels, selection of tumor areas, and the number of tumor cells to evaluate. We assessed the impact of targeting peripheral versus central tumor areas using tissue microarray-based staining for Ki-67 throughout the tumor diameter in 25 leiomyosarcomas. In 18/25 tumors, Ki-67 expression was higher in the tumor periphery. If 10% staining tumor nuclei was used as cut-off and the maximal Ki-67 staining section in the tumor periphery was considered, 21/25 tumors would have been classified as highly proliferative compared to 14/25 if the tumor center had been analyzed. Similar results were obtained also when higher cut-off levels were used and if the mean expression rather than the maximal expression was considered and the differences were neither caused by necrosis nor by hypoxia (assessed as HIF-1alpha expression). Our findings suggest that the determination of proliferation in soft tissue sarcomas should be standardized for clinical application of Ki-67 as a prognostic marker.",
author = "J Fernebro and J Engellau and A Persson and A Rydholm and Mef Nilbert",
year = "2007",
doi = "http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_650.x",
language = "English",
volume = "115",
pages = "707--12",
journal = "A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica",
issn = "0903-4641",
publisher = "Wiley Online",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Standardizing evaluation of sarcoma proliferation- higher Ki-67 expression in the tumor periphery than the center

AU - Fernebro, J

AU - Engellau, J

AU - Persson, A

AU - Rydholm, A

AU - Nilbert, Mef

PY - 2007

Y1 - 2007

N2 - Soft tissue sarcomas often present as large and histopathologically heterogenous tumors. Proliferation has repeatedly been identified as a prognostic factor and immunostaining for Ki-67 represents the most commonly used proliferation marker. There is, however, a lack of consensus on how to evaluate Ki-67 staining regarding optimal cut-off levels, selection of tumor areas, and the number of tumor cells to evaluate. We assessed the impact of targeting peripheral versus central tumor areas using tissue microarray-based staining for Ki-67 throughout the tumor diameter in 25 leiomyosarcomas. In 18/25 tumors, Ki-67 expression was higher in the tumor periphery. If 10% staining tumor nuclei was used as cut-off and the maximal Ki-67 staining section in the tumor periphery was considered, 21/25 tumors would have been classified as highly proliferative compared to 14/25 if the tumor center had been analyzed. Similar results were obtained also when higher cut-off levels were used and if the mean expression rather than the maximal expression was considered and the differences were neither caused by necrosis nor by hypoxia (assessed as HIF-1alpha expression). Our findings suggest that the determination of proliferation in soft tissue sarcomas should be standardized for clinical application of Ki-67 as a prognostic marker.

AB - Soft tissue sarcomas often present as large and histopathologically heterogenous tumors. Proliferation has repeatedly been identified as a prognostic factor and immunostaining for Ki-67 represents the most commonly used proliferation marker. There is, however, a lack of consensus on how to evaluate Ki-67 staining regarding optimal cut-off levels, selection of tumor areas, and the number of tumor cells to evaluate. We assessed the impact of targeting peripheral versus central tumor areas using tissue microarray-based staining for Ki-67 throughout the tumor diameter in 25 leiomyosarcomas. In 18/25 tumors, Ki-67 expression was higher in the tumor periphery. If 10% staining tumor nuclei was used as cut-off and the maximal Ki-67 staining section in the tumor periphery was considered, 21/25 tumors would have been classified as highly proliferative compared to 14/25 if the tumor center had been analyzed. Similar results were obtained also when higher cut-off levels were used and if the mean expression rather than the maximal expression was considered and the differences were neither caused by necrosis nor by hypoxia (assessed as HIF-1alpha expression). Our findings suggest that the determination of proliferation in soft tissue sarcomas should be standardized for clinical application of Ki-67 as a prognostic marker.

U2 - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_650.x

DO - http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1600-0463.2007.apm_650.x

M3 - Journal article

VL - 115

SP - 707

EP - 712

JO - A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica

JF - A P M I S. Acta Pathologica, Microbiologica et Immunologica Scandinavica

SN - 0903-4641

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 40183310