Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment?

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment? / Kroman, Niels; Jensen, Maj Britt; Melbye, Mads; Wohlfahrt, Jan; Mouridsen, Henning T.

In: Lancet, Vol. 350, No. 9074, 02.08.1997, p. 319-322.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Kroman, N, Jensen, MB, Melbye, M, Wohlfahrt, J & Mouridsen, HT 1997, 'Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment?', Lancet, vol. 350, no. 9074, pp. 319-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03052-3

APA

Kroman, N., Jensen, M. B., Melbye, M., Wohlfahrt, J., & Mouridsen, H. T. (1997). Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment? Lancet, 350(9074), 319-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03052-3

Vancouver

Kroman N, Jensen MB, Melbye M, Wohlfahrt J, Mouridsen HT. Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment? Lancet. 1997 Aug 2;350(9074):319-322. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03052-3

Author

Kroman, Niels ; Jensen, Maj Britt ; Melbye, Mads ; Wohlfahrt, Jan ; Mouridsen, Henning T. / Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment?. In: Lancet. 1997 ; Vol. 350, No. 9074. pp. 319-322.

Bibtex

@article{4423300983c542b891ccb81501847c1c,
title = "Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment?",
abstract = "Background. Oestrogen is an established growth factor in breast cancer. There has, therefore, been much discussion about whether women should be advised against becoming pregnant after breast-cancer treatment because of a possible negative prognostic effect from the high oestrogen concentrations associated with pregnancy. Methods. We studied 5725 women with primary breast cancer. Information on these women was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Since 1977 this group has collected population-based data on tumour characteristics, treatment regimens, and follow-up status of Danish women with breast cancer. Details of reproductive history were obtained from The Danish Civil Registration System, the National Birth Registry, and the National Induced Abortion registry. We estimated the relative risk of death among women who became pregnant after breast-cancer treatment compared with women who had not become pregnant. Findings. 5725 women with primary breast cancer aged 45 years or younger at the time of diagnosis were followed up for 35,067 patient-years. Among these, 173 women became pregnant after treatment of breast cancer. Women who had a full-term pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment had a non-significantly reduced risk of death (relative risk 0.55 [95% Cl 0.28-1.06]) compared with women who had had no full-term pregnancy after adjustment for age at diagnosis, stage of disease (tumour size, axillary nodal status, and histological grading), and reproductive history before diagnosis. The effect was also not significantly modified by age at diagnosis, tumour size, nodal status, or reproductive history before diagnosis of breast cancer. Neither miscarriages nor induced abortions after breast-cancer treatment influenced the prognosis. Interpretation. We found no evidence that a pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment increased the risk of a poor outcome.",
author = "Niels Kroman and Jensen, {Maj Britt} and Mads Melbye and Jan Wohlfahrt and Mouridsen, {Henning T.}",
year = "1997",
month = aug,
day = "2",
doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03052-3",
language = "English",
volume = "350",
pages = "319--322",
journal = "The Lancet",
issn = "0140-6736",
publisher = "TheLancet Publishing Group",
number = "9074",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Should women be advised against pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment?

AU - Kroman, Niels

AU - Jensen, Maj Britt

AU - Melbye, Mads

AU - Wohlfahrt, Jan

AU - Mouridsen, Henning T.

PY - 1997/8/2

Y1 - 1997/8/2

N2 - Background. Oestrogen is an established growth factor in breast cancer. There has, therefore, been much discussion about whether women should be advised against becoming pregnant after breast-cancer treatment because of a possible negative prognostic effect from the high oestrogen concentrations associated with pregnancy. Methods. We studied 5725 women with primary breast cancer. Information on these women was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Since 1977 this group has collected population-based data on tumour characteristics, treatment regimens, and follow-up status of Danish women with breast cancer. Details of reproductive history were obtained from The Danish Civil Registration System, the National Birth Registry, and the National Induced Abortion registry. We estimated the relative risk of death among women who became pregnant after breast-cancer treatment compared with women who had not become pregnant. Findings. 5725 women with primary breast cancer aged 45 years or younger at the time of diagnosis were followed up for 35,067 patient-years. Among these, 173 women became pregnant after treatment of breast cancer. Women who had a full-term pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment had a non-significantly reduced risk of death (relative risk 0.55 [95% Cl 0.28-1.06]) compared with women who had had no full-term pregnancy after adjustment for age at diagnosis, stage of disease (tumour size, axillary nodal status, and histological grading), and reproductive history before diagnosis. The effect was also not significantly modified by age at diagnosis, tumour size, nodal status, or reproductive history before diagnosis of breast cancer. Neither miscarriages nor induced abortions after breast-cancer treatment influenced the prognosis. Interpretation. We found no evidence that a pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment increased the risk of a poor outcome.

AB - Background. Oestrogen is an established growth factor in breast cancer. There has, therefore, been much discussion about whether women should be advised against becoming pregnant after breast-cancer treatment because of a possible negative prognostic effect from the high oestrogen concentrations associated with pregnancy. Methods. We studied 5725 women with primary breast cancer. Information on these women was obtained from the Danish Breast Cancer Cooperative Group. Since 1977 this group has collected population-based data on tumour characteristics, treatment regimens, and follow-up status of Danish women with breast cancer. Details of reproductive history were obtained from The Danish Civil Registration System, the National Birth Registry, and the National Induced Abortion registry. We estimated the relative risk of death among women who became pregnant after breast-cancer treatment compared with women who had not become pregnant. Findings. 5725 women with primary breast cancer aged 45 years or younger at the time of diagnosis were followed up for 35,067 patient-years. Among these, 173 women became pregnant after treatment of breast cancer. Women who had a full-term pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment had a non-significantly reduced risk of death (relative risk 0.55 [95% Cl 0.28-1.06]) compared with women who had had no full-term pregnancy after adjustment for age at diagnosis, stage of disease (tumour size, axillary nodal status, and histological grading), and reproductive history before diagnosis. The effect was also not significantly modified by age at diagnosis, tumour size, nodal status, or reproductive history before diagnosis of breast cancer. Neither miscarriages nor induced abortions after breast-cancer treatment influenced the prognosis. Interpretation. We found no evidence that a pregnancy after breast-cancer treatment increased the risk of a poor outcome.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0030877102&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03052-3

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(97)03052-3

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 9251635

AN - SCOPUS:0030877102

VL - 350

SP - 319

EP - 322

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

SN - 0140-6736

IS - 9074

ER -

ID: 259819570