Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naive": a comment to Begthol
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Standard
Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naive" : a comment to Begthol. / Hjørland, Birger; Nicolaisen, Jeppe.
In: Knowledge Organization, Vol. 31, No. 1, 2004, p. 55-61.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research
Harvard
Hjørland, B & Nicolaisen, J 2004, 'Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naive": a comment to Begthol', Knowledge Organization, vol. 31, no. 1, pp. 55-61.
APA
Hjørland, B., & Nicolaisen, J. (2004). Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naive": a comment to Begthol. Knowledge Organization, 31(1), 55-61.
Vancouver
Hjørland B, Nicolaisen J. Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naive": a comment to Begthol. Knowledge Organization. 2004;31(1):55-61.
Author
Bibtex
@article{e9b6b735f7344ba7b9c652bc0d88486e,
title = "Scientific and scholarly classifications are not {"}naive{"}: a comment to Begthol",
keywords = "Vidensorganisation, Dom{\ae}neanalyse",
author = "Birger Hj{\o}rland and Jeppe Nicolaisen",
year = "2004",
language = "English",
volume = "31",
pages = "55--61",
journal = "Knowledge Organization",
issn = "0943-7444",
publisher = "Ergon-Verlag",
number = "1",
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Scientific and scholarly classifications are not "naive"
T2 - a comment to Begthol
AU - Hjørland, Birger
AU - Nicolaisen, Jeppe
PY - 2004
Y1 - 2004
KW - Vidensorganisation
KW - Domæneanalyse
M3 - Journal article
VL - 31
SP - 55
EP - 61
JO - Knowledge Organization
JF - Knowledge Organization
SN - 0943-7444
IS - 1
ER -
ID: 47031834