Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis: outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis : outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry. / Voorde, Pia C Ten; Rasmussen, Jeppe V; Olsen, Bo S; Brorson, Stig.

In: Acta Orthopaedica, Vol. 86, No. 3, 06.2015, p. 293-7.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Voorde, PCT, Rasmussen, JV, Olsen, BS & Brorson, S 2015, 'Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis: outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry', Acta Orthopaedica, vol. 86, no. 3, pp. 293-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1018761

APA

Voorde, P. C. T., Rasmussen, J. V., Olsen, B. S., & Brorson, S. (2015). Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis: outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry. Acta Orthopaedica, 86(3), 293-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1018761

Vancouver

Voorde PCT, Rasmussen JV, Olsen BS, Brorson S. Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis: outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry. Acta Orthopaedica. 2015 Jun;86(3):293-7. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453674.2015.1018761

Author

Voorde, Pia C Ten ; Rasmussen, Jeppe V ; Olsen, Bo S ; Brorson, Stig. / Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis : outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry. In: Acta Orthopaedica. 2015 ; Vol. 86, No. 3. pp. 293-7.

Bibtex

@article{3d1a1b802f1e47d697f20949e396264a,
title = "Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis: outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry",
abstract = "BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no consensus on which type of shoulder prosthesis should be used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We describe patients with RA who were treated with shoulder replacement, regarding patient-reported outcome, prosthesis survival, and causes of revision, and we compare outcome after resurfacing hemi-arthroplasty (RHA) and stemmed hemi-arthroplasty (SHA).PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from the national Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry and included patients with RA who underwent shoulder arthroplasty in Denmark between 2006 and 2010. Patient-reported outcome was obtained 1-year postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS), and rates of revision were calculated by checking revisions reported until December 2011. The patient-reported outcome of RHA was compared to that of SHA using regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, and previous surgery.RESULTS: During the study period, 167 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty because of rheumatoid arthritis, 80 (48%) of whom received RHA and 34 (26%) of whom received SHA. 16 patients were treated with total stemmed shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and 24 were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). 130 patients returned a completed questionnaire, and the total mean WOOS score was 63. The cumulative 5-year revision rate was 7%. Most revisions occurred after RHA, with a revision rate of 14%. Mean WOOS score was similar for RHA and for SHA.INTERPRETATION: This study shows that shoulder arthroplasty, regardless of design, is a good option in terms of reducing pain and improving function in RA patients. The high revision rate in the RHA group suggests that other designs may offer better implant survival. However, this should be confirmed in larger studies.",
keywords = "Aged, Arthritis, Rheumatoid, Arthroplasty, Denmark, Female, Hemiarthroplasty, Humans, Incidence, Joint Prosthesis, Male, Middle Aged, Registries, Reoperation, Retrospective Studies, Severity of Illness Index, Shoulder Joint, Treatment Outcome",
author = "Voorde, {Pia C Ten} and Rasmussen, {Jeppe V} and Olsen, {Bo S} and Stig Brorson",
year = "2015",
month = jun,
doi = "10.3109/17453674.2015.1018761",
language = "English",
volume = "86",
pages = "293--7",
journal = "Acta Orthopaedica",
issn = "1745-3674",
publisher = "Taylor & Francis",
number = "3",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Resurfacing shoulder arthroplasty for the treatment of severe rheumatoid arthritis

T2 - outcome in 167 patients from the Danish Shoulder Registry

AU - Voorde, Pia C Ten

AU - Rasmussen, Jeppe V

AU - Olsen, Bo S

AU - Brorson, Stig

PY - 2015/6

Y1 - 2015/6

N2 - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no consensus on which type of shoulder prosthesis should be used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We describe patients with RA who were treated with shoulder replacement, regarding patient-reported outcome, prosthesis survival, and causes of revision, and we compare outcome after resurfacing hemi-arthroplasty (RHA) and stemmed hemi-arthroplasty (SHA).PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from the national Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry and included patients with RA who underwent shoulder arthroplasty in Denmark between 2006 and 2010. Patient-reported outcome was obtained 1-year postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS), and rates of revision were calculated by checking revisions reported until December 2011. The patient-reported outcome of RHA was compared to that of SHA using regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, and previous surgery.RESULTS: During the study period, 167 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty because of rheumatoid arthritis, 80 (48%) of whom received RHA and 34 (26%) of whom received SHA. 16 patients were treated with total stemmed shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and 24 were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). 130 patients returned a completed questionnaire, and the total mean WOOS score was 63. The cumulative 5-year revision rate was 7%. Most revisions occurred after RHA, with a revision rate of 14%. Mean WOOS score was similar for RHA and for SHA.INTERPRETATION: This study shows that shoulder arthroplasty, regardless of design, is a good option in terms of reducing pain and improving function in RA patients. The high revision rate in the RHA group suggests that other designs may offer better implant survival. However, this should be confirmed in larger studies.

AB - BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: There is no consensus on which type of shoulder prosthesis should be used in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). We describe patients with RA who were treated with shoulder replacement, regarding patient-reported outcome, prosthesis survival, and causes of revision, and we compare outcome after resurfacing hemi-arthroplasty (RHA) and stemmed hemi-arthroplasty (SHA).PATIENTS AND METHODS: We used data from the national Danish Shoulder Arthroplasty Registry and included patients with RA who underwent shoulder arthroplasty in Denmark between 2006 and 2010. Patient-reported outcome was obtained 1-year postoperatively using the Western Ontario Osteoarthritis of the Shoulder index (WOOS), and rates of revision were calculated by checking revisions reported until December 2011. The patient-reported outcome of RHA was compared to that of SHA using regression analysis with adjustment for age, sex, and previous surgery.RESULTS: During the study period, 167 patients underwent shoulder arthroplasty because of rheumatoid arthritis, 80 (48%) of whom received RHA and 34 (26%) of whom received SHA. 16 patients were treated with total stemmed shoulder arthroplasty (TSA), and 24 were treated with reverse shoulder arthroplasty (rTSA). 130 patients returned a completed questionnaire, and the total mean WOOS score was 63. The cumulative 5-year revision rate was 7%. Most revisions occurred after RHA, with a revision rate of 14%. Mean WOOS score was similar for RHA and for SHA.INTERPRETATION: This study shows that shoulder arthroplasty, regardless of design, is a good option in terms of reducing pain and improving function in RA patients. The high revision rate in the RHA group suggests that other designs may offer better implant survival. However, this should be confirmed in larger studies.

KW - Aged

KW - Arthritis, Rheumatoid

KW - Arthroplasty

KW - Denmark

KW - Female

KW - Hemiarthroplasty

KW - Humans

KW - Incidence

KW - Joint Prosthesis

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Registries

KW - Reoperation

KW - Retrospective Studies

KW - Severity of Illness Index

KW - Shoulder Joint

KW - Treatment Outcome

U2 - 10.3109/17453674.2015.1018761

DO - 10.3109/17453674.2015.1018761

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 25673155

VL - 86

SP - 293

EP - 297

JO - Acta Orthopaedica

JF - Acta Orthopaedica

SN - 1745-3674

IS - 3

ER -

ID: 162674828