Relational approaches to personal autonomy
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Relational approaches to personal autonomy. / Lee, Ji Young.
In: Philosophy Compass, Vol. 18, No. 5, e12916, 2023.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Relational approaches to personal autonomy
AU - Lee, Ji Young
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 The Authors. Philosophy Compass published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Individualistic traditions of autonomy have long been critiqued by feminists for their atomistic and asocial presentation of human agents. Relational approaches to autonomy were developed as an alternative to these views. Relational accounts generally capture a more socially informed picture of human agents, and aim to differentiate between social phenomena that are conducive to our agency versus those that pose a hindrance to our agency. In this article, I explore the various relational conceptualizations of autonomy profferred to date. I critically review some of the ongoing internal disputes within the relational autonomy literature, and conclude the article by taking stock of the value of relational autonomy despite these unresolved debates.
AB - Individualistic traditions of autonomy have long been critiqued by feminists for their atomistic and asocial presentation of human agents. Relational approaches to autonomy were developed as an alternative to these views. Relational accounts generally capture a more socially informed picture of human agents, and aim to differentiate between social phenomena that are conducive to our agency versus those that pose a hindrance to our agency. In this article, I explore the various relational conceptualizations of autonomy profferred to date. I critically review some of the ongoing internal disputes within the relational autonomy literature, and conclude the article by taking stock of the value of relational autonomy despite these unresolved debates.
UR - https://compass.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1111/phc3.12916
U2 - 10.1111/phc3.12916
DO - 10.1111/phc3.12916
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85151985691
VL - 18
JO - Philosophy Compass
JF - Philosophy Compass
SN - 1747-9991
IS - 5
M1 - e12916
ER -
ID: 344526019