Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy: A Comparative Analysis

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy : A Comparative Analysis. / Tzelnick, Sharon; Tsur, Nir; Amir, Ido; Mizrachi, Aviram; Watt, Torquil; Rabinovics, Naomi; Mamun, Yaakov; Yaniv, Dan; Bachar, Gideon; Najjar, Esmat.

In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, Vol. 33, No. 1, 2023, p. 8-14.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Tzelnick, S, Tsur, N, Amir, I, Mizrachi, A, Watt, T, Rabinovics, N, Mamun, Y, Yaniv, D, Bachar, G & Najjar, E 2023, 'Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy: A Comparative Analysis', Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, vol. 33, no. 1, pp. 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2022.0183

APA

Tzelnick, S., Tsur, N., Amir, I., Mizrachi, A., Watt, T., Rabinovics, N., Mamun, Y., Yaniv, D., Bachar, G., & Najjar, E. (2023). Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques, 33(1), 8-14. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2022.0183

Vancouver

Tzelnick S, Tsur N, Amir I, Mizrachi A, Watt T, Rabinovics N et al. Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy: A Comparative Analysis. Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2023;33(1):8-14. https://doi.org/10.1089/lap.2022.0183

Author

Tzelnick, Sharon ; Tsur, Nir ; Amir, Ido ; Mizrachi, Aviram ; Watt, Torquil ; Rabinovics, Naomi ; Mamun, Yaakov ; Yaniv, Dan ; Bachar, Gideon ; Najjar, Esmat. / Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy : A Comparative Analysis. In: Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques. 2023 ; Vol. 33, No. 1. pp. 8-14.

Bibtex

@article{b2a1069d19564d95b50f4e51157abc1d,
title = "Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy: A Comparative Analysis",
abstract = "Background: Robotic technology has proven safe and effective for thyroidectomy procedures. Few studies have addressed the quality-of-life outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy. Materials and Methods: The database of a tertiary medical center was retrospectively reviewed for all patients with thyroid disease who had undergone robotic hemithyroidectomy in 2012-2020. All patients treated by transaxillary robotic surgery and a similar number of randomly selected patients treated by conventional cervical surgery completed a standardized self-administered thyroid disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire (ThyPRO). Clinical data were derived from the medical files. The results were compared using mean comparison tests and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The cohort consisted of 131 patients: 63 after robotic thyroidectomy and 68 after conventional thyroidectomy. The mean age was 38.87 ± 14.11 and 58.85 ± 14.1 years, respectively (P < .0001). The robotic hemithyroidectomy group reported better QOL outcomes in physical and mental health parameters, including decreased anxiety, depression, lower sex life impairment, and cognitive impairment scores (P < .0001). Furthermore, after adjusting for age, gender, malignancy status, and surgical approach, we found that patients undergoing robotic hemithyroidectomy had a lower probability of experiencing depressive symptoms than the conventional hemithyroidectomy group (odds ratio = 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.88). Of interest, no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes was found. Conclusions: Patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy report better postoperative QOL after surgery than patients operated by the conventional approach in terms of anxiety, depression, cognitive and sex-life scores. ",
keywords = "quality of life, robotic hemithyroidectomy, ThyPRO questionnaire",
author = "Sharon Tzelnick and Nir Tsur and Ido Amir and Aviram Mizrachi and Torquil Watt and Naomi Rabinovics and Yaakov Mamun and Dan Yaniv and Gideon Bachar and Esmat Najjar",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023.",
year = "2023",
doi = "10.1089/lap.2022.0183",
language = "English",
volume = "33",
pages = "8--14",
journal = "Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A",
issn = "1092-6429",
publisher = "Mary Ann Liebert, Inc. Publishers",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Quality of Life Following Robotic Transaxillary Versus Conventional Hemithyroidectomy

T2 - A Comparative Analysis

AU - Tzelnick, Sharon

AU - Tsur, Nir

AU - Amir, Ido

AU - Mizrachi, Aviram

AU - Watt, Torquil

AU - Rabinovics, Naomi

AU - Mamun, Yaakov

AU - Yaniv, Dan

AU - Bachar, Gideon

AU - Najjar, Esmat

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © Copyright 2023, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc., publishers 2023.

PY - 2023

Y1 - 2023

N2 - Background: Robotic technology has proven safe and effective for thyroidectomy procedures. Few studies have addressed the quality-of-life outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy. Materials and Methods: The database of a tertiary medical center was retrospectively reviewed for all patients with thyroid disease who had undergone robotic hemithyroidectomy in 2012-2020. All patients treated by transaxillary robotic surgery and a similar number of randomly selected patients treated by conventional cervical surgery completed a standardized self-administered thyroid disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire (ThyPRO). Clinical data were derived from the medical files. The results were compared using mean comparison tests and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The cohort consisted of 131 patients: 63 after robotic thyroidectomy and 68 after conventional thyroidectomy. The mean age was 38.87 ± 14.11 and 58.85 ± 14.1 years, respectively (P < .0001). The robotic hemithyroidectomy group reported better QOL outcomes in physical and mental health parameters, including decreased anxiety, depression, lower sex life impairment, and cognitive impairment scores (P < .0001). Furthermore, after adjusting for age, gender, malignancy status, and surgical approach, we found that patients undergoing robotic hemithyroidectomy had a lower probability of experiencing depressive symptoms than the conventional hemithyroidectomy group (odds ratio = 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.88). Of interest, no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes was found. Conclusions: Patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy report better postoperative QOL after surgery than patients operated by the conventional approach in terms of anxiety, depression, cognitive and sex-life scores.

AB - Background: Robotic technology has proven safe and effective for thyroidectomy procedures. Few studies have addressed the quality-of-life outcomes of robotic thyroidectomy compared with conventional thyroidectomy. Materials and Methods: The database of a tertiary medical center was retrospectively reviewed for all patients with thyroid disease who had undergone robotic hemithyroidectomy in 2012-2020. All patients treated by transaxillary robotic surgery and a similar number of randomly selected patients treated by conventional cervical surgery completed a standardized self-administered thyroid disease-specific quality-of-life (QOL) questionnaire (ThyPRO). Clinical data were derived from the medical files. The results were compared using mean comparison tests and multivariate logistic regression models. Results: The cohort consisted of 131 patients: 63 after robotic thyroidectomy and 68 after conventional thyroidectomy. The mean age was 38.87 ± 14.11 and 58.85 ± 14.1 years, respectively (P < .0001). The robotic hemithyroidectomy group reported better QOL outcomes in physical and mental health parameters, including decreased anxiety, depression, lower sex life impairment, and cognitive impairment scores (P < .0001). Furthermore, after adjusting for age, gender, malignancy status, and surgical approach, we found that patients undergoing robotic hemithyroidectomy had a lower probability of experiencing depressive symptoms than the conventional hemithyroidectomy group (odds ratio = 0.31; 95% confidence interval, 0.11-0.88). Of interest, no significant difference in cosmetic outcomes was found. Conclusions: Patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy report better postoperative QOL after surgery than patients operated by the conventional approach in terms of anxiety, depression, cognitive and sex-life scores.

KW - quality of life

KW - robotic hemithyroidectomy

KW - ThyPRO questionnaire

U2 - 10.1089/lap.2022.0183

DO - 10.1089/lap.2022.0183

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 36322881

AN - SCOPUS:85145955693

VL - 33

SP - 8

EP - 14

JO - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

JF - Journal of Laparoendoscopic and Advanced Surgical Techniques - Part A

SN - 1092-6429

IS - 1

ER -

ID: 362688307