New methodologies for the digital age? How methods (re-)organize research using social media data
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
New methodologies for the digital age? How methods (re-)organize research using social media data. / Fan, Yangliu; Lehmann, Sune; Blok, Anders.
In: Quantitative Science Studies, Vol. 4, No. 4, 2023, p. 976-996.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - New methodologies for the digital age?
T2 - How methods (re-)organize research using social media data
AU - Fan, Yangliu
AU - Lehmann, Sune
AU - Blok, Anders
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2023 Yangliu Fan, Sune Lehmann, and Anders Blok.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - As “big and broad” social media data continues to expand and become a more prevalent source for research, much remains to be understood about its epistemological and methodological implications. Drawing on an original data set of 12,732 research articles using social media data, we employ a novel dictionary-based approach to map the use of methods. Specifically, our approach draws on a combination of manual coding and embedding-enhanced query expansion. We cluster journals in groups of densely connected research communities to investigate how heterogeneous these groups are in terms of the methods used. First, our results indicate that research in this domain is largely organized by methods. Some communities tend to have a monomethod culture, and others combine methods in novel ways. Comparing practices across communities, we observe that computational methods have penetrated many research areas but not the research space surrounding ethnography. Second, we identify two core axes of variation—social sciences vs. computer science and methodological individualism vs. relationalism—that organize the domain as a whole, suggesting new methodological divisions and debates.
AB - As “big and broad” social media data continues to expand and become a more prevalent source for research, much remains to be understood about its epistemological and methodological implications. Drawing on an original data set of 12,732 research articles using social media data, we employ a novel dictionary-based approach to map the use of methods. Specifically, our approach draws on a combination of manual coding and embedding-enhanced query expansion. We cluster journals in groups of densely connected research communities to investigate how heterogeneous these groups are in terms of the methods used. First, our results indicate that research in this domain is largely organized by methods. Some communities tend to have a monomethod culture, and others combine methods in novel ways. Comparing practices across communities, we observe that computational methods have penetrated many research areas but not the research space surrounding ethnography. Second, we identify two core axes of variation—social sciences vs. computer science and methodological individualism vs. relationalism—that organize the domain as a whole, suggesting new methodological divisions and debates.
KW - big social data
KW - research methods
KW - science studies
KW - social media data
KW - word embedding
U2 - 10.1162/qss_a_00271
DO - 10.1162/qss_a_00271
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85186568726
VL - 4
SP - 976
EP - 996
JO - Quantitative Science Studies
JF - Quantitative Science Studies
SN - 2641-3337
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 387073597