Impact of caller's degree-of-worry on triage response in out-of-hours telephone consultations: a randomized controlled trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Impact of caller's degree-of-worry on triage response in out-of-hours telephone consultations : a randomized controlled trial. / Gamst-Jensen, Hejdi; Frishknecht Christensen, Erika; Lippert, Freddy; Folke, Fredrik; Egerod, Ingrid; Brabrand, Mikkel; Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann; Thygesen, Lau Caspar; Huibers, Linda.
In: Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine, Vol. 27, 44, 2019.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Impact of caller's degree-of-worry on triage response in out-of-hours telephone consultations
T2 - a randomized controlled trial
AU - Gamst-Jensen, Hejdi
AU - Frishknecht Christensen, Erika
AU - Lippert, Freddy
AU - Folke, Fredrik
AU - Egerod, Ingrid
AU - Brabrand, Mikkel
AU - Tolstrup, Janne Schurmann
AU - Thygesen, Lau Caspar
AU - Huibers, Linda
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - BACKGROUND: Telephone triage entails assessment of urgency and direction of flow in out-of-hours (OOH) services, while visual cues are inherently lacking. Triage tools are recommended but current tools fail to provide systematic assessment of the caller's perspective. Research demonstrated that callers can scale their degree-of-worry (DOW) in a telephone contact with OOH services, but its impact on triage response is undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between call-handlers' awareness of the caller's DOW and the telephone triage response.METHODS: A randomized controlled trial at a Danish OOH service using telephone triage with quantitative analyses and qualitative process evaluation. Prior to contact with a call-handler, callers were asked to rate their DOW on a five-point scale. Calls were randomized to show or not show DOW on the call-handlers' screens. Triage response (telephone consultation or face-to-face consultation) was analysed using Chi-square tests. Process evaluation incorporated a quantitative and qualitative assessment of intervention implementation and fidelity.RESULTS: Of 11,413 calls, 5705 were allocated to the intervention and 5708 to the control group. No difference in number of face-to-face consultations was detected between the two groups (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14, p = 0.17). The process evaluation showed that call-handlers did not use the DOW systematically and were reluctant to use DOW.CONCLUSION: Awareness of DOW did not affect the triage response, but this finding could reflect a weak implementation strategy. Future studies should emphasise the implementation strategy to determine the effect of DOW on triage response.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02979457 .
AB - BACKGROUND: Telephone triage entails assessment of urgency and direction of flow in out-of-hours (OOH) services, while visual cues are inherently lacking. Triage tools are recommended but current tools fail to provide systematic assessment of the caller's perspective. Research demonstrated that callers can scale their degree-of-worry (DOW) in a telephone contact with OOH services, but its impact on triage response is undetermined. The aim of this study was to investigate the association between call-handlers' awareness of the caller's DOW and the telephone triage response.METHODS: A randomized controlled trial at a Danish OOH service using telephone triage with quantitative analyses and qualitative process evaluation. Prior to contact with a call-handler, callers were asked to rate their DOW on a five-point scale. Calls were randomized to show or not show DOW on the call-handlers' screens. Triage response (telephone consultation or face-to-face consultation) was analysed using Chi-square tests. Process evaluation incorporated a quantitative and qualitative assessment of intervention implementation and fidelity.RESULTS: Of 11,413 calls, 5705 were allocated to the intervention and 5708 to the control group. No difference in number of face-to-face consultations was detected between the two groups (OR 1.05, 95% CI 0.98 to 1.14, p = 0.17). The process evaluation showed that call-handlers did not use the DOW systematically and were reluctant to use DOW.CONCLUSION: Awareness of DOW did not affect the triage response, but this finding could reflect a weak implementation strategy. Future studies should emphasise the implementation strategy to determine the effect of DOW on triage response.TRIAL REGISTRATION: Registration number, Clinicaltrials.gov NCT02979457 .
KW - Adolescent
KW - Adult
KW - After-Hours Care/organization & administration
KW - Aged
KW - Child
KW - Child, Preschool
KW - Humans
KW - Infant
KW - Infant, Newborn
KW - Male
KW - Middle Aged
KW - Primary Health Care/organization & administration
KW - Process Assessment (Health Care)
KW - Referral and Consultation/organization & administration
KW - Telephone
KW - Triage/methods
KW - Young Adult
U2 - 10.1186/s13049-019-0618-2
DO - 10.1186/s13049-019-0618-2
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 30975160
VL - 27
JO - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
JF - Scandinavian Journal of Trauma, Resuscitation and Emergency Medicine
SN - 1757-7241
M1 - 44
ER -
ID: 224603301