Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen? Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner. / Larsen, Kristian; Hindhede, Anette Lykke.
In: Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab, Vol. 3-4, 2020, p. 49-68.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Hvad siger Bourdieu og Foucault om dyrkelse af sundhedskroppen?
T2 - Komparation mellem sociologiske og socialfilosofiske positioner
AU - Larsen, Kristian
AU - Hindhede, Anette Lykke
PY - 2020
Y1 - 2020
N2 - In this article, we outline ways of thinking and concepts that addresses the new health regime. We take as an onset Bourdieu’s writings on the socialized body and lifestyles. We then review studies inspired by the French philosopher Michel Foucault’ thinking about bodies and his concepts of biopolitics and governmentality. Focus will be on the work by Nikolas Rose and his thinking about the will to health and identity. Subsequently, we discuss the similaritiesand differences between the two positions. We argue that common to these ways of thinking is that we must understand bodies as created and creating. However, while the social philosophers show overall and general transformations of societies and bodies, Bourdieu’s relational position adds to this description by offering empirical sensitivity to social reproductions, distinctions and heterogeneous health- and body strategies.
AB - In this article, we outline ways of thinking and concepts that addresses the new health regime. We take as an onset Bourdieu’s writings on the socialized body and lifestyles. We then review studies inspired by the French philosopher Michel Foucault’ thinking about bodies and his concepts of biopolitics and governmentality. Focus will be on the work by Nikolas Rose and his thinking about the will to health and identity. Subsequently, we discuss the similaritiesand differences between the two positions. We argue that common to these ways of thinking is that we must understand bodies as created and creating. However, while the social philosophers show overall and general transformations of societies and bodies, Bourdieu’s relational position adds to this description by offering empirical sensitivity to social reproductions, distinctions and heterogeneous health- and body strategies.
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
VL - 3-4
SP - 49
EP - 68
JO - Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab
JF - Praktiske Grunde: Nordisk tidsskrift for kultur- og samfundsvidenskab
SN - 1902-2271
ER -
ID: 317083343