Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress. / Booth, P. J.; Vajta, Gaber; Høj, A.; Holm, Peter; Greve, Torben; Callesen, Henrik.

In: Theriogenology, Vol. 51, 1999, p. 999-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Booth, PJ, Vajta, G, Høj, A, Holm, P, Greve, T & Callesen, H 1999, 'Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress', Theriogenology, vol. 51, pp. 999-1006. <http://www.mendeley.com/research/fullterm-development-nuclear-transfer-callesen-producer-openpulles-straw-ops-vitrified-cytoplasts-wo>

APA

Booth, P. J., Vajta, G., Høj, A., Holm, P., Greve, T., & Callesen, H. (1999). Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress. Theriogenology, 51, 999-1006. http://www.mendeley.com/research/fullterm-development-nuclear-transfer-callesen-producer-openpulles-straw-ops-vitrified-cytoplasts-wo

Vancouver

Booth PJ, Vajta G, Høj A, Holm P, Greve T, Callesen H. Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress. Theriogenology. 1999;51:999-1006.

Author

Booth, P. J. ; Vajta, Gaber ; Høj, A. ; Holm, Peter ; Greve, Torben ; Callesen, Henrik. / Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress. In: Theriogenology. 1999 ; Vol. 51. pp. 999-1006.

Bibtex

@article{c4494b8ceb5742d8ab65ce8bb488c19b,
title = "Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress",
abstract = "Cryopreservation of cytoplasts would help to resolve the logistics of matching the \navailability of oocytes with embryo donors in nuclear transfer. Therefore, the developmental \npotential of nuclear transfer bovine embryos reconstructed using vitrified cytoplasts was \ninvestigated. In vitro matured oocytes were denuded, enucleated, activated with calcium \nionophore (10 p.M, 5 min) and cycloheximide (10 Ixg/mL, 6 h) and then vitrified by the open \npulled straw (OPS) method. After immediate warming, the nuclear transfer embryos were \nreconstructed using blastomeres from nonvitrified, in vitro-produced embryo donors. Compared \nwith control nuclear transfer embryos that were reconstructed using nonvitrified cytoplasts, \nfusionrates (% ± SEM) were not affected (83.7 ± 9.2 vs 79.8 ± 4.6; P>0.05), but cleavage (55.7 ± \n2.9 vs 92.8 ± 3.9; P=0.0002) and blastocyst rates (7.2 ± 5.0 vs 32.6 ± 7.8; P=0.0025, vitrified vs \nnonvitrified cytoplasts, respectively) per successful fusion were reduced. One nuclear transfer \nblastocyst reconstructed from a vitrified cytoplast was transferred to a synchronized recipient. \nAfter a normal length gestation (265 d), twin calves (21 and 26 kg) were delivered. Microsatellite \nanalysis confirmed that the calves were homozygotic (the embryo split in utero), and were \nderived from the in vitro-produced embryo donor. The twins were dead at birth, but post-mortem \nanalysis of the calves indicated no abnormalities or infections, suggesting that their death was \nrelated to the twin pregnancy and the known fragility of nuclear transfer calves. These data \ndemonstrate that open pulled straw-vitrified cytoplasts are capable of supporting full-term \ndevelopment of nucleartransfer embryos. ",
keywords = "bovine, cloning, cytoplast, nuclear transfer, vitrification",
author = "Booth, {P. J.} and Gaber Vajta and A. H{\o}j and Peter Holm and Torben Greve and Henrik Callesen",
year = "1999",
language = "English",
volume = "51",
pages = "999--1006",
journal = "Theriogenology",
issn = "0093-691X",
publisher = "Elsevier",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Full-term development of nuclear transfer Callesen producer from open-pulles straw (OPS) vitrified cytoplasts: work in progress

AU - Booth, P. J.

AU - Vajta, Gaber

AU - Høj, A.

AU - Holm, Peter

AU - Greve, Torben

AU - Callesen, Henrik

PY - 1999

Y1 - 1999

N2 - Cryopreservation of cytoplasts would help to resolve the logistics of matching the \navailability of oocytes with embryo donors in nuclear transfer. Therefore, the developmental \npotential of nuclear transfer bovine embryos reconstructed using vitrified cytoplasts was \ninvestigated. In vitro matured oocytes were denuded, enucleated, activated with calcium \nionophore (10 p.M, 5 min) and cycloheximide (10 Ixg/mL, 6 h) and then vitrified by the open \npulled straw (OPS) method. After immediate warming, the nuclear transfer embryos were \nreconstructed using blastomeres from nonvitrified, in vitro-produced embryo donors. Compared \nwith control nuclear transfer embryos that were reconstructed using nonvitrified cytoplasts, \nfusionrates (% ± SEM) were not affected (83.7 ± 9.2 vs 79.8 ± 4.6; P>0.05), but cleavage (55.7 ± \n2.9 vs 92.8 ± 3.9; P=0.0002) and blastocyst rates (7.2 ± 5.0 vs 32.6 ± 7.8; P=0.0025, vitrified vs \nnonvitrified cytoplasts, respectively) per successful fusion were reduced. One nuclear transfer \nblastocyst reconstructed from a vitrified cytoplast was transferred to a synchronized recipient. \nAfter a normal length gestation (265 d), twin calves (21 and 26 kg) were delivered. Microsatellite \nanalysis confirmed that the calves were homozygotic (the embryo split in utero), and were \nderived from the in vitro-produced embryo donor. The twins were dead at birth, but post-mortem \nanalysis of the calves indicated no abnormalities or infections, suggesting that their death was \nrelated to the twin pregnancy and the known fragility of nuclear transfer calves. These data \ndemonstrate that open pulled straw-vitrified cytoplasts are capable of supporting full-term \ndevelopment of nucleartransfer embryos.

AB - Cryopreservation of cytoplasts would help to resolve the logistics of matching the \navailability of oocytes with embryo donors in nuclear transfer. Therefore, the developmental \npotential of nuclear transfer bovine embryos reconstructed using vitrified cytoplasts was \ninvestigated. In vitro matured oocytes were denuded, enucleated, activated with calcium \nionophore (10 p.M, 5 min) and cycloheximide (10 Ixg/mL, 6 h) and then vitrified by the open \npulled straw (OPS) method. After immediate warming, the nuclear transfer embryos were \nreconstructed using blastomeres from nonvitrified, in vitro-produced embryo donors. Compared \nwith control nuclear transfer embryos that were reconstructed using nonvitrified cytoplasts, \nfusionrates (% ± SEM) were not affected (83.7 ± 9.2 vs 79.8 ± 4.6; P>0.05), but cleavage (55.7 ± \n2.9 vs 92.8 ± 3.9; P=0.0002) and blastocyst rates (7.2 ± 5.0 vs 32.6 ± 7.8; P=0.0025, vitrified vs \nnonvitrified cytoplasts, respectively) per successful fusion were reduced. One nuclear transfer \nblastocyst reconstructed from a vitrified cytoplast was transferred to a synchronized recipient. \nAfter a normal length gestation (265 d), twin calves (21 and 26 kg) were delivered. Microsatellite \nanalysis confirmed that the calves were homozygotic (the embryo split in utero), and were \nderived from the in vitro-produced embryo donor. The twins were dead at birth, but post-mortem \nanalysis of the calves indicated no abnormalities or infections, suggesting that their death was \nrelated to the twin pregnancy and the known fragility of nuclear transfer calves. These data \ndemonstrate that open pulled straw-vitrified cytoplasts are capable of supporting full-term \ndevelopment of nucleartransfer embryos.

KW - bovine

KW - cloning

KW - cytoplast

KW - nuclear transfer

KW - vitrification

M3 - Journal article

VL - 51

SP - 999

EP - 1006

JO - Theriogenology

JF - Theriogenology

SN - 0093-691X

ER -

ID: 141542731