Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions. / Lord, E; Stockdale, A J; Malek, R; Rae, C; Sperle, I; Raben, D; Freedman, A; Churchill, D; Lundgren, J; Sullivan, A K; British Association of Sexual Health HIV (BASHH)/British HIV Association (BHIVA) guideline review group for the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project by HIV in Europeb.

In: HIV Medicine, Vol. 18, No. 4, 04.2017, p. 300-304.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Lord, E, Stockdale, AJ, Malek, R, Rae, C, Sperle, I, Raben, D, Freedman, A, Churchill, D, Lundgren, J, Sullivan, AK & British Association of Sexual Health HIV (BASHH)/British HIV Association (BHIVA) guideline review group for the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project by HIV in Europeb 2017, 'Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions', HIV Medicine, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 300-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12430

APA

Lord, E., Stockdale, A. J., Malek, R., Rae, C., Sperle, I., Raben, D., Freedman, A., Churchill, D., Lundgren, J., Sullivan, A. K., & British Association of Sexual Health HIV (BASHH)/British HIV Association (BHIVA) guideline review group for the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project by HIV in Europeb (2017). Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions. HIV Medicine, 18(4), 300-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12430

Vancouver

Lord E, Stockdale AJ, Malek R, Rae C, Sperle I, Raben D et al. Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions. HIV Medicine. 2017 Apr;18(4):300-304. https://doi.org/10.1111/hiv.12430

Author

Lord, E ; Stockdale, A J ; Malek, R ; Rae, C ; Sperle, I ; Raben, D ; Freedman, A ; Churchill, D ; Lundgren, J ; Sullivan, A K ; British Association of Sexual Health HIV (BASHH)/British HIV Association (BHIVA) guideline review group for the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project by HIV in Europeb. / Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions. In: HIV Medicine. 2017 ; Vol. 18, No. 4. pp. 300-304.

Bibtex

@article{8a343b4fcaa34de3805ea1bf10461a5f,
title = "Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions",
abstract = "OBJECTIVES: European guidelines recommend HIV testing for individuals presenting with indicator conditions (ICs) including AIDS-defining conditions (ADCs). The extent to which non-HIV specialty guidelines recommend HIV testing in ICs and ADCs is unknown. Our aim was to pilot a methodology in the UK to review specialty guidelines and ascertain if HIV was discussed and testing recommended.METHODS: UK and European HIV testing guidelines were reviewed to produce a list of 25 ADCs and 49 ICs. UK guidelines for these conditions were identified from searches of the websites of specialist societies, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) website, the NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries (CKS) website, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidance Network (SIGN) website and the British Medical Journal Best Practice database and from Google searches.RESULTS: We identified guidelines for 12 of 25 ADCs (48%) and 36 of 49 (73%) ICs. In total, 78 guidelines were reviewed (range 0-13 per condition). HIV testing was recommended in six of 17 ADC guidelines (35%) and 24 of 61 IC guidelines (39%). At least one guideline recommended HIV testing for six of 25 ADCs (24%) and 16 of 49 ICs (33%). There was no association between recommendation to test and publication year (P = 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: The majority of guidelines for ICs do not recommend testing. Clinicians managing ICs may be unaware of recommendations produced by HIV societies or the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection among these patients. We are piloting methods to engage with guideline development groups to ensure that patients diagnosed with ICs/ADCs are tested for HIV. We then plan to apply our methodology in other European settings as part of the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project.",
keywords = "HIV Infections/diagnosis, Humans, Mass Screening/methods, Practice Guidelines as Topic, United Kingdom",
author = "E Lord and Stockdale, {A J} and R Malek and C Rae and I Sperle and D Raben and A Freedman and D Churchill and J Lundgren and Sullivan, {A K} and {British Association of Sexual Health HIV (BASHH)/British HIV Association (BHIVA) guideline review group for the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project by HIV in Europeb}",
note = "{\textcopyright} 2016 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.",
year = "2017",
month = apr,
doi = "10.1111/hiv.12430",
language = "English",
volume = "18",
pages = "300--304",
journal = "HIV Medicine",
issn = "1464-2662",
publisher = "Wiley-Blackwell",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Evaluation of HIV testing recommendations in specialty guidelines for the management of HIV indicator conditions

AU - Lord, E

AU - Stockdale, A J

AU - Malek, R

AU - Rae, C

AU - Sperle, I

AU - Raben, D

AU - Freedman, A

AU - Churchill, D

AU - Lundgren, J

AU - Sullivan, A K

AU - British Association of Sexual Health HIV (BASHH)/British HIV Association (BHIVA) guideline review group for the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project by HIV in Europeb

N1 - © 2016 The Authors. HIV Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of British HIV Association.

PY - 2017/4

Y1 - 2017/4

N2 - OBJECTIVES: European guidelines recommend HIV testing for individuals presenting with indicator conditions (ICs) including AIDS-defining conditions (ADCs). The extent to which non-HIV specialty guidelines recommend HIV testing in ICs and ADCs is unknown. Our aim was to pilot a methodology in the UK to review specialty guidelines and ascertain if HIV was discussed and testing recommended.METHODS: UK and European HIV testing guidelines were reviewed to produce a list of 25 ADCs and 49 ICs. UK guidelines for these conditions were identified from searches of the websites of specialist societies, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) website, the NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries (CKS) website, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidance Network (SIGN) website and the British Medical Journal Best Practice database and from Google searches.RESULTS: We identified guidelines for 12 of 25 ADCs (48%) and 36 of 49 (73%) ICs. In total, 78 guidelines were reviewed (range 0-13 per condition). HIV testing was recommended in six of 17 ADC guidelines (35%) and 24 of 61 IC guidelines (39%). At least one guideline recommended HIV testing for six of 25 ADCs (24%) and 16 of 49 ICs (33%). There was no association between recommendation to test and publication year (P = 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: The majority of guidelines for ICs do not recommend testing. Clinicians managing ICs may be unaware of recommendations produced by HIV societies or the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection among these patients. We are piloting methods to engage with guideline development groups to ensure that patients diagnosed with ICs/ADCs are tested for HIV. We then plan to apply our methodology in other European settings as part of the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project.

AB - OBJECTIVES: European guidelines recommend HIV testing for individuals presenting with indicator conditions (ICs) including AIDS-defining conditions (ADCs). The extent to which non-HIV specialty guidelines recommend HIV testing in ICs and ADCs is unknown. Our aim was to pilot a methodology in the UK to review specialty guidelines and ascertain if HIV was discussed and testing recommended.METHODS: UK and European HIV testing guidelines were reviewed to produce a list of 25 ADCs and 49 ICs. UK guidelines for these conditions were identified from searches of the websites of specialist societies, the National Institute of Clinical Excellence (NICE) website, the NICE Clinical Knowledge Summaries (CKS) website, the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidance Network (SIGN) website and the British Medical Journal Best Practice database and from Google searches.RESULTS: We identified guidelines for 12 of 25 ADCs (48%) and 36 of 49 (73%) ICs. In total, 78 guidelines were reviewed (range 0-13 per condition). HIV testing was recommended in six of 17 ADC guidelines (35%) and 24 of 61 IC guidelines (39%). At least one guideline recommended HIV testing for six of 25 ADCs (24%) and 16 of 49 ICs (33%). There was no association between recommendation to test and publication year (P = 0.62).CONCLUSIONS: The majority of guidelines for ICs do not recommend testing. Clinicians managing ICs may be unaware of recommendations produced by HIV societies or the prevalence of undiagnosed HIV infection among these patients. We are piloting methods to engage with guideline development groups to ensure that patients diagnosed with ICs/ADCs are tested for HIV. We then plan to apply our methodology in other European settings as part of the Optimising Testing and Linkage to Care for HIV across Europe (OptTEST) project.

KW - HIV Infections/diagnosis

KW - Humans

KW - Mass Screening/methods

KW - Practice Guidelines as Topic

KW - United Kingdom

U2 - 10.1111/hiv.12430

DO - 10.1111/hiv.12430

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 27535357

VL - 18

SP - 300

EP - 304

JO - HIV Medicine

JF - HIV Medicine

SN - 1464-2662

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 193967620