Entangling Intentionality: Reflections on Torture and Structure
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Entangling Intentionality : Reflections on Torture and Structure. / Cakal, Ergun.
In: Social Justice : A Journal of Crime, Conflict & World Order, Vol. 48, No. 3, 1, 2022, p. 1-29.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Entangling Intentionality
T2 - Reflections on Torture and Structure
AU - Cakal, Ergun
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - Torture, as structural violence, can be inflicted slowly, routinely, and undramatically. It implicates, instrumentalizes, and entangles both individualand institutional agents, and must be viewed as emerging from a complexapparatus responsible for its instigation and infliction. Failing this, we failto attend to torture’s totality, particularly for the purposes of its socio-legalanalysis. Leaving directness or explicitness of torturous acts of the individualbehind (although equally important), a focus on the insidious and structuralis warranted. This requires looking beyond individual and toward institutional logics, thus turning to systemic and systematic aspects. This article willdiscuss the implications emerging from such doctrinal individual centricity,as epitomized by the element of intentionality, a constitutive element oftorture under Article 1 of the UN Convention against Torture. Then, it willendeavor to shift perspective from perpetrating individuals to perpetratinginstitutions, taking the denial of health care in Egyptian prisons as a casestudy through which to illustrate these dynamics.
AB - Torture, as structural violence, can be inflicted slowly, routinely, and undramatically. It implicates, instrumentalizes, and entangles both individualand institutional agents, and must be viewed as emerging from a complexapparatus responsible for its instigation and infliction. Failing this, we failto attend to torture’s totality, particularly for the purposes of its socio-legalanalysis. Leaving directness or explicitness of torturous acts of the individualbehind (although equally important), a focus on the insidious and structuralis warranted. This requires looking beyond individual and toward institutional logics, thus turning to systemic and systematic aspects. This article willdiscuss the implications emerging from such doctrinal individual centricity,as epitomized by the element of intentionality, a constitutive element oftorture under Article 1 of the UN Convention against Torture. Then, it willendeavor to shift perspective from perpetrating individuals to perpetratinginstitutions, taking the denial of health care in Egyptian prisons as a casestudy through which to illustrate these dynamics.
M3 - Journal article
VL - 48
SP - 1
EP - 29
JO - Social Justice : A Journal of Crime, Conflict & World Order
JF - Social Justice : A Journal of Crime, Conflict & World Order
SN - 0094-7571
IS - 3
M1 - 1
ER -
ID: 285589749