Cutaneous sensory block area of the ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block: an observational study
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Cutaneous sensory block area of the ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block : an observational study. / Salmonsen, Christopher Blom; Lange, Kai Henrik Wiborg; Rothe, Christian; Kleif, Jakob; Bertelsen, Claus Anders.
In: Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine, Vol. 49, No. 4, 2024, p. 289-292.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Cutaneous sensory block area of the ultrasound-guided subcostal transversus abdominis plane block
T2 - an observational study
AU - Salmonsen, Christopher Blom
AU - Lange, Kai Henrik Wiborg
AU - Rothe, Christian
AU - Kleif, Jakob
AU - Bertelsen, Claus Anders
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © American Society of Regional Anesthesia & Pain Medicine 2023. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background and objectives: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) can be applied using different approaches, resulting in varying cutaneous analgesic distributions. This study aimed to assess the cutaneous sensory block area (CSBA) after ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) using the subcostal approach. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received a subcostal US-TAP with 20 mL 2.5 mg/mL ropivacaine bilaterally. Measurements were performed 150 min after block application. The CSBA was mapped using cold sensation and a sterile marker, photodocumented, and transferred to a transparency. The area of the CSBA was calculated from the transparencies. Results: The median CSBA of the subcostal US-TAP was 174 cm2 (IQR 119-219 cm2; range 52-398 cm2). In all patients, the CSBA had a periumbilical distribution. In 42 of the 60 (70%) unilateral blocks, the CSBA had both an epigastric and infraumbilical component; in 12 of the 60 (20%) unilateral blocks, it covered only the epigastrium; and in 4 of the 60 (7%) unilateral blocks, it had only an infraumbilical distribution. No CSBA was found in 2 of the 60 (3%) unilateral blocks. In none of the patients did the CSBA cover the abdominal wall lateral to a vertical line through the anterior superior iliac spine. Conclusion: The subcostal US-TAP results in a heterogeneous non-dermatomal CSBA with varying size and distribution across the medial abdominal wall.
AB - Background and objectives: The transversus abdominis plane block (TAP) can be applied using different approaches, resulting in varying cutaneous analgesic distributions. This study aimed to assess the cutaneous sensory block area (CSBA) after ultrasound-guided TAP (US-TAP) using the subcostal approach. Methods: Thirty patients undergoing elective laparoscopic cholecystectomy received a subcostal US-TAP with 20 mL 2.5 mg/mL ropivacaine bilaterally. Measurements were performed 150 min after block application. The CSBA was mapped using cold sensation and a sterile marker, photodocumented, and transferred to a transparency. The area of the CSBA was calculated from the transparencies. Results: The median CSBA of the subcostal US-TAP was 174 cm2 (IQR 119-219 cm2; range 52-398 cm2). In all patients, the CSBA had a periumbilical distribution. In 42 of the 60 (70%) unilateral blocks, the CSBA had both an epigastric and infraumbilical component; in 12 of the 60 (20%) unilateral blocks, it covered only the epigastrium; and in 4 of the 60 (7%) unilateral blocks, it had only an infraumbilical distribution. No CSBA was found in 2 of the 60 (3%) unilateral blocks. In none of the patients did the CSBA cover the abdominal wall lateral to a vertical line through the anterior superior iliac spine. Conclusion: The subcostal US-TAP results in a heterogeneous non-dermatomal CSBA with varying size and distribution across the medial abdominal wall.
KW - analgesia
KW - anesthesia, local
KW - nerve block
KW - pain management
KW - ultrasonography
U2 - 10.1136/rapm-2023-104753
DO - 10.1136/rapm-2023-104753
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 37640451
AN - SCOPUS:85171201485
VL - 49
SP - 289
EP - 292
JO - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
JF - Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine
SN - 1098-7339
IS - 4
ER -
ID: 373027520