Contrasts in freedom: Comparing the experiences of imprisonment in open and closed prisons in England and Wales and Norway
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Contrasts in freedom : Comparing the experiences of imprisonment in open and closed prisons in England and Wales and Norway. / Mjåland, Kristian; Laursen, Julie; Schliehe, Anna; Larmour, Simon.
In: European Journal of Criminology, Vol. 20, No. 5, 2023, p. 1641-1662.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Contrasts in freedom
T2 - Comparing the experiences of imprisonment in open and closed prisons in England and Wales and Norway
AU - Mjåland, Kristian
AU - Laursen, Julie
AU - Schliehe, Anna
AU - Larmour, Simon
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2023
Y1 - 2023
N2 - Open prisons are portrayed as less harmful custodial institutions than closed prisons, and prison systems that rely more heavily on low security imprisonment are typically considered to have a more humane and less punitive approach to punishment. However, few studies have systematically compared the subjective experiences of prisoners held in open and closed prisons, and no study has yet compared the role and function of open prisons across jurisdictions. Drawing on a survey conducted with prisoners (N = 1082) in 13 prisons in England and Wales and Norway, we provide the first comparative analysis of experiences of imprisonment in closed and open prisons, conducted in countries with diverging penal philosophies (‘neoliberal’ vs. ‘social democratic’). The article documents that open prisons play a much more significant role in Norway than in England and Wales; that prisoners in both countries rate their experience significantly more positively in open compared to closed prisons; and that while imprisonment seems to produce similar kinds of pains in both types of prisons, they are perceived as less severe and more manageable in open prisons. These findings suggest important implications for comparative penology, penal policy, and prison reform.
AB - Open prisons are portrayed as less harmful custodial institutions than closed prisons, and prison systems that rely more heavily on low security imprisonment are typically considered to have a more humane and less punitive approach to punishment. However, few studies have systematically compared the subjective experiences of prisoners held in open and closed prisons, and no study has yet compared the role and function of open prisons across jurisdictions. Drawing on a survey conducted with prisoners (N = 1082) in 13 prisons in England and Wales and Norway, we provide the first comparative analysis of experiences of imprisonment in closed and open prisons, conducted in countries with diverging penal philosophies (‘neoliberal’ vs. ‘social democratic’). The article documents that open prisons play a much more significant role in Norway than in England and Wales; that prisoners in both countries rate their experience significantly more positively in open compared to closed prisons; and that while imprisonment seems to produce similar kinds of pains in both types of prisons, they are perceived as less severe and more manageable in open prisons. These findings suggest important implications for comparative penology, penal policy, and prison reform.
KW - comparative penology
KW - Nordic exceptionalism
KW - Open prisons
KW - pains of imprisonment
U2 - 10.1177/14773708211065905
DO - 10.1177/14773708211065905
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85122138427
VL - 20
SP - 1641
EP - 1662
JO - European Journal of Criminology
JF - European Journal of Criminology
SN - 1477-3708
IS - 5
ER -
ID: 290189669