Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark. / Hald, Andreas Nielsen; Bech, Mickael; Burau, Viola.

In: Health Policy, Vol. 125, No. 4, 2021, p. 474-481.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Hald, AN, Bech, M & Burau, V 2021, 'Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark', Health Policy, vol. 125, no. 4, pp. 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007

APA

Hald, A. N., Bech, M., & Burau, V. (2021). Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark. Health Policy, 125(4), 474-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007

Vancouver

Hald AN, Bech M, Burau V. Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark. Health Policy. 2021;125(4):474-481. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007

Author

Hald, Andreas Nielsen ; Bech, Mickael ; Burau, Viola. / Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark. In: Health Policy. 2021 ; Vol. 125, No. 4. pp. 474-481.

Bibtex

@article{8f448671d6134135b29ec432d595ce97,
title = "Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark",
abstract = "Introduction: Increasing demand for interprofessional collaboration in health care settings has led to a greater focus on how conditions influence the success of interprofessional collaboration, but little is known about the magnitude of the interactions between different conditions. This paper aims to examine the relationships of intervention conditions and context conditions at the professional and organisational level and examine how they influence the staff's perceived success of the interprofessional collaboration. Methods: The study was conducted as a multilevel cross-sectional survey in March of 2019 in the second largest municipality in Denmark, Aarhus. The study population was all frontline-staff members and managers in nursing homes, home care units and health care units. The final sample consisted of 498 staff members and 27 managers. Confirmatory path analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: The results indicate that context conditions greatly influence intervention conditions at the professional and organisational level and that the professional and organisational levels moderately co-variate. Professional level context conditions have the biggest influence on staff's perceived success, partly because its influence is confounded by intervention conditions. Conclusion: Practice and research in health care settings should re-focus their attention from a broad understanding of context as unchangeable and inconsequential, to understanding context as an important condition type for interprofessional collaboration that needs to be further understood and researched.",
keywords = "Health planning, Health workforce, Mediation analysis, Organization and administration, Personnel management, Public health practice",
author = "Hald, {Andreas Nielsen} and Mickael Bech and Viola Burau",
note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Elsevier B.V.",
year = "2021",
doi = "10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007",
language = "English",
volume = "125",
pages = "474--481",
journal = "Health Policy",
issn = "0168-8510",
publisher = "Elsevier Ireland Ltd",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Conditions for successful interprofessional collaboration in integrated care – Lessons from a primary care setting in Denmark

AU - Hald, Andreas Nielsen

AU - Bech, Mickael

AU - Burau, Viola

N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2021 Elsevier B.V.

PY - 2021

Y1 - 2021

N2 - Introduction: Increasing demand for interprofessional collaboration in health care settings has led to a greater focus on how conditions influence the success of interprofessional collaboration, but little is known about the magnitude of the interactions between different conditions. This paper aims to examine the relationships of intervention conditions and context conditions at the professional and organisational level and examine how they influence the staff's perceived success of the interprofessional collaboration. Methods: The study was conducted as a multilevel cross-sectional survey in March of 2019 in the second largest municipality in Denmark, Aarhus. The study population was all frontline-staff members and managers in nursing homes, home care units and health care units. The final sample consisted of 498 staff members and 27 managers. Confirmatory path analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: The results indicate that context conditions greatly influence intervention conditions at the professional and organisational level and that the professional and organisational levels moderately co-variate. Professional level context conditions have the biggest influence on staff's perceived success, partly because its influence is confounded by intervention conditions. Conclusion: Practice and research in health care settings should re-focus their attention from a broad understanding of context as unchangeable and inconsequential, to understanding context as an important condition type for interprofessional collaboration that needs to be further understood and researched.

AB - Introduction: Increasing demand for interprofessional collaboration in health care settings has led to a greater focus on how conditions influence the success of interprofessional collaboration, but little is known about the magnitude of the interactions between different conditions. This paper aims to examine the relationships of intervention conditions and context conditions at the professional and organisational level and examine how they influence the staff's perceived success of the interprofessional collaboration. Methods: The study was conducted as a multilevel cross-sectional survey in March of 2019 in the second largest municipality in Denmark, Aarhus. The study population was all frontline-staff members and managers in nursing homes, home care units and health care units. The final sample consisted of 498 staff members and 27 managers. Confirmatory path analysis was used to analyse the data. Results: The results indicate that context conditions greatly influence intervention conditions at the professional and organisational level and that the professional and organisational levels moderately co-variate. Professional level context conditions have the biggest influence on staff's perceived success, partly because its influence is confounded by intervention conditions. Conclusion: Practice and research in health care settings should re-focus their attention from a broad understanding of context as unchangeable and inconsequential, to understanding context as an important condition type for interprofessional collaboration that needs to be further understood and researched.

KW - Health planning

KW - Health workforce

KW - Mediation analysis

KW - Organization and administration

KW - Personnel management

KW - Public health practice

U2 - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007

DO - 10.1016/j.healthpol.2021.01.007

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 33573776

AN - SCOPUS:85100676678

VL - 125

SP - 474

EP - 481

JO - Health Policy

JF - Health Policy

SN - 0168-8510

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 388636073