Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep. / Axelsen, Martin Glasdam; Overgaard, Soren; Jespersen, Stig M.; Ding, Ming.

In: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, Vol. 14, 2, 03.01.2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Axelsen, MG, Overgaard, S, Jespersen, SM & Ding, M 2019, 'Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep', Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, vol. 14, 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4

APA

Axelsen, M. G., Overgaard, S., Jespersen, S. M., & Ding, M. (2019). Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, 14, [2]. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4

Vancouver

Axelsen MG, Overgaard S, Jespersen SM, Ding M. Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep. Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019 Jan 3;14. 2. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4

Author

Axelsen, Martin Glasdam ; Overgaard, Soren ; Jespersen, Stig M. ; Ding, Ming. / Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep. In: Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research. 2019 ; Vol. 14.

Bibtex

@article{d4be41ffd9834b29b0f9fa96ecca0f87,
title = "Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep",
abstract = "Background:Spinal fusion is a commonly used procedure in spinal surgery. To ensure stable fusion, bone graft materials are used. ABM/P-15 (commercial name i-FactorTM Flex) is an available synthetic bone graft material that has CE approval in Europe. This peptide has been shown to improve bone formation when used in devices with fixation or on bone defects. However, the lack of external stability and large graft size make posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) a most challenging grafting procedure. This prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate early spinal fusion rates using an anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM) combined with a synthetic 15 amino acid sequence (P-15) – ABM/P-15 bone graft, and compared with allograft in an uninstrumented PLF model in sheep. The objective of this study was to assess fusion rates when using ABM/P-15 in uninstrumented posterolateral fusion in sheep.Methods: Twelve Texas/Gotland mixed breed sheep underwent open PLF at two levels L2/L3 and L4/L5 without fixation instruments. The levels were randomized so that sheep received an ABM graft either with or without P15 coating. Sheep were euthanized after 4.5 months and levels were harvested and evaluated with a micro-CT scanner and qualitative histology. Fusion rates were assessed by 2D sections and 3D reconstruction images and fusion was defined as intertransverse bridging.Results: There was 68% fusion rate in the allograft group and an extensive migration of graft material was noticed with a fusion rate of just 37% in the ABM/P-15 group. Qualitative histology showed positive osteointegration of the material and good correlation to scanning results. Conclusions: In this PLF fusion model, ABM/P15 demonstrated the ability to migrate when lacking external stability. Due to this migration, reported fusion rates were significantly lower than in the allograft group. The use of ABM/P15 as i-FactorTM Flex may be limited to devices with fixation and bone defects. ",
author = "Axelsen, {Martin Glasdam} and Soren Overgaard and Jespersen, {Stig M.} and Ming Ding",
year = "2019",
month = jan,
day = "3",
doi = "10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4",
language = "English",
volume = "14",
journal = "Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research",
issn = "1749-799X",
publisher = "BioMed Central",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Comparison of synthetic bone graft ABM/P-15 and allograft on uninstrumented posterior lumbar spine fusion in sheep

AU - Axelsen, Martin Glasdam

AU - Overgaard, Soren

AU - Jespersen, Stig M.

AU - Ding, Ming

PY - 2019/1/3

Y1 - 2019/1/3

N2 - Background:Spinal fusion is a commonly used procedure in spinal surgery. To ensure stable fusion, bone graft materials are used. ABM/P-15 (commercial name i-FactorTM Flex) is an available synthetic bone graft material that has CE approval in Europe. This peptide has been shown to improve bone formation when used in devices with fixation or on bone defects. However, the lack of external stability and large graft size make posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) a most challenging grafting procedure. This prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate early spinal fusion rates using an anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM) combined with a synthetic 15 amino acid sequence (P-15) – ABM/P-15 bone graft, and compared with allograft in an uninstrumented PLF model in sheep. The objective of this study was to assess fusion rates when using ABM/P-15 in uninstrumented posterolateral fusion in sheep.Methods: Twelve Texas/Gotland mixed breed sheep underwent open PLF at two levels L2/L3 and L4/L5 without fixation instruments. The levels were randomized so that sheep received an ABM graft either with or without P15 coating. Sheep were euthanized after 4.5 months and levels were harvested and evaluated with a micro-CT scanner and qualitative histology. Fusion rates were assessed by 2D sections and 3D reconstruction images and fusion was defined as intertransverse bridging.Results: There was 68% fusion rate in the allograft group and an extensive migration of graft material was noticed with a fusion rate of just 37% in the ABM/P-15 group. Qualitative histology showed positive osteointegration of the material and good correlation to scanning results. Conclusions: In this PLF fusion model, ABM/P15 demonstrated the ability to migrate when lacking external stability. Due to this migration, reported fusion rates were significantly lower than in the allograft group. The use of ABM/P15 as i-FactorTM Flex may be limited to devices with fixation and bone defects.

AB - Background:Spinal fusion is a commonly used procedure in spinal surgery. To ensure stable fusion, bone graft materials are used. ABM/P-15 (commercial name i-FactorTM Flex) is an available synthetic bone graft material that has CE approval in Europe. This peptide has been shown to improve bone formation when used in devices with fixation or on bone defects. However, the lack of external stability and large graft size make posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF) a most challenging grafting procedure. This prospective randomized study was designed to evaluate early spinal fusion rates using an anorganic bovine-derived hydroxyapatite matrix (ABM) combined with a synthetic 15 amino acid sequence (P-15) – ABM/P-15 bone graft, and compared with allograft in an uninstrumented PLF model in sheep. The objective of this study was to assess fusion rates when using ABM/P-15 in uninstrumented posterolateral fusion in sheep.Methods: Twelve Texas/Gotland mixed breed sheep underwent open PLF at two levels L2/L3 and L4/L5 without fixation instruments. The levels were randomized so that sheep received an ABM graft either with or without P15 coating. Sheep were euthanized after 4.5 months and levels were harvested and evaluated with a micro-CT scanner and qualitative histology. Fusion rates were assessed by 2D sections and 3D reconstruction images and fusion was defined as intertransverse bridging.Results: There was 68% fusion rate in the allograft group and an extensive migration of graft material was noticed with a fusion rate of just 37% in the ABM/P-15 group. Qualitative histology showed positive osteointegration of the material and good correlation to scanning results. Conclusions: In this PLF fusion model, ABM/P15 demonstrated the ability to migrate when lacking external stability. Due to this migration, reported fusion rates were significantly lower than in the allograft group. The use of ABM/P15 as i-FactorTM Flex may be limited to devices with fixation and bone defects.

U2 - 10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4

DO - 10.1186/s13018-018-1042-4

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30606209

VL - 14

JO - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

JF - Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research

SN - 1749-799X

M1 - 2

ER -

ID: 252056861