Challenges and Opportunities for Implementing Diversity Competence in a Medical Education Curriculum: A Qualitative Study of Perceptions Among Students and Teachers
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Challenges and Opportunities for Implementing Diversity Competence in a Medical Education Curriculum : A Qualitative Study of Perceptions Among Students and Teachers. / Sørensen, Janne; Primdahl, N L; Norredam, M; Krasnik, A.
In: Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development, Vol. 11, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Challenges and Opportunities for Implementing Diversity Competence in a Medical Education Curriculum
T2 - A Qualitative Study of Perceptions Among Students and Teachers
AU - Sørensen, Janne
AU - Primdahl, N L
AU - Norredam, M
AU - Krasnik, A
N1 - © The Author(s) 2024.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - OBJECTIVES: Medical education is under continuous pressure to introduce new curriculum content to ensure that physicians possess the competences that the population needs. Diversity competence (DC) is a relatively new area within medicine, challenging the existing curriculum. Frameworks and guidelines have been developed to provide support and assistance to educators in integrating DC into medical programs. However, integrating DC into curriculum has proven difficult and is therefore still not included in many European medical programs. The purpose of the study is therefore to identify the challenges and opportunities for implementing DC including a focus on migrant and ethnic minorities in a medical education program.METHODS: From November 2-20, 2020, focus group discussions with medical students, junior physicians and course leaders were conducted. The participants were recruited via Facebook, newsletters, and emails. Two interview guides were developed and used as guidance for topics to be discussed. The focus group discussions were conducted partly physically and partly digitally. The interviews were transcribed and were analyzed using thematic analysis.RESULTS: Three main challenges and opportunities were identified across the focus groups. Challenges: (i) a disparaging discourse about humanistic and social disciplines within the curriculum, (ii) limited levels of DC among teachers, and (iii) need for institutional support. Opportunities: (i) a clear interest in strengthening teachers' DC levels, (ii) incentives for improving the image of humanistic and social medicine, and (iii) relevant courses for implementing DC.CONCLUSION: Our results showed that action in this area is needed. The themes identified indicated that there are within the curriculum many opportunities to implement DC, but they also illuminated the challenges. The results suggested both a need for focusing on individual competences for medical teachers and students, and also for organizational change and support in favor of DC training.
AB - OBJECTIVES: Medical education is under continuous pressure to introduce new curriculum content to ensure that physicians possess the competences that the population needs. Diversity competence (DC) is a relatively new area within medicine, challenging the existing curriculum. Frameworks and guidelines have been developed to provide support and assistance to educators in integrating DC into medical programs. However, integrating DC into curriculum has proven difficult and is therefore still not included in many European medical programs. The purpose of the study is therefore to identify the challenges and opportunities for implementing DC including a focus on migrant and ethnic minorities in a medical education program.METHODS: From November 2-20, 2020, focus group discussions with medical students, junior physicians and course leaders were conducted. The participants were recruited via Facebook, newsletters, and emails. Two interview guides were developed and used as guidance for topics to be discussed. The focus group discussions were conducted partly physically and partly digitally. The interviews were transcribed and were analyzed using thematic analysis.RESULTS: Three main challenges and opportunities were identified across the focus groups. Challenges: (i) a disparaging discourse about humanistic and social disciplines within the curriculum, (ii) limited levels of DC among teachers, and (iii) need for institutional support. Opportunities: (i) a clear interest in strengthening teachers' DC levels, (ii) incentives for improving the image of humanistic and social medicine, and (iii) relevant courses for implementing DC.CONCLUSION: Our results showed that action in this area is needed. The themes identified indicated that there are within the curriculum many opportunities to implement DC, but they also illuminated the challenges. The results suggested both a need for focusing on individual competences for medical teachers and students, and also for organizational change and support in favor of DC training.
U2 - 10.1177/23821205241236593
DO - 10.1177/23821205241236593
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38444784
VL - 11
JO - Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
JF - Journal of Medical Education and Curricular Development
SN - 2382-1205
ER -
ID: 384493335