Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development. / Marott, Sarah C W; Nordestgaard, Børge G; Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne; Benn, Marianne.

In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, Vol. 104, No. 4, 2019, p. 1313-1324.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Marott, SCW, Nordestgaard, BG, Tybjærg-Hansen, A & Benn, M 2019, 'Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development', The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, vol. 104, no. 4, pp. 1313-1324. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01648

APA

Marott, S. C. W., Nordestgaard, B. G., Tybjærg-Hansen, A., & Benn, M. (2019). Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism, 104(4), 1313-1324. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01648

Vancouver

Marott SCW, Nordestgaard BG, Tybjærg-Hansen A, Benn M. Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development. The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2019;104(4):1313-1324. https://doi.org/10.1210/jc.2018-01648

Author

Marott, Sarah C W ; Nordestgaard, Børge G ; Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne ; Benn, Marianne. / Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development. In: The Journal of clinical endocrinology and metabolism. 2019 ; Vol. 104, No. 4. pp. 1313-1324.

Bibtex

@article{a190e1ee3d0944a6a46b960326bd6279,
title = "Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development",
abstract = "CONTEXT: Obesity, glucose, insulin resistance [homeostatic model assessment, version 2, for insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR)], and insulin secretion (HOMA2-β) have been associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) observationally. However, the causal, genetic contribution of each parameter to this risk is largely unknown and important to study because observational data are prone to confounding but genetic, causal data are free of confounding and reverse causation.OBJECTIVE: We examined the causal, genetic contribution of body mass index (BMI), glucose level, C-peptide level, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-β to the risk of T2D in 95,540 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and estimated the absolute 10-year risks.METHODS: Cox regression analysis, instrumental variable analysis, and Poisson regression analysis were performed to estimate the observational hazard ratios, causal, genetic ORs, and absolute 10-year risks of T2D.RESULTS: For 1-SD greater level, BMI was associated with an observational 66% (95% CI, 62% to 72%) and causal, genetic 121% (95% CI, 25% to 291%) greater risk of T2D; glucose with an observational 44% (95% CI, 41% to 46%) and causal, genetic 183% (95% CI, 56% to 416%) greater risk of T2D; and HOMA2-IR with an observational 30% (95% CI, 18% to 44%) and causal, genetic 12% (95% CI, 2% to 22%) greater risk of T2D. In contrast, for 1-SD greater level, HOMA2-β was associated with an observational 14% (95% CI, 11% to 16%) and causal, genetic 21% (95% CI, 8% to 32%) lower risk of T2D. The upper tertiles of HOMA2-IR were associated with absolute 10-year diabetes risks of 31% and 37% in obese women and men, age >60 years, and a glucose level of 6.1 to 11.0 mmol/L.CONCLUSIONS: BMI, glucose level, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-β are causally associated with T2D.",
author = "Marott, {Sarah C W} and Nordestgaard, {B{\o}rge G} and Anne Tybj{\ae}rg-Hansen and Marianne Benn",
note = "Copyright {\textcopyright} 2019 Endocrine Society.",
year = "2019",
doi = "10.1210/jc.2018-01648",
language = "English",
volume = "104",
pages = "1313--1324",
journal = "Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism",
issn = "0021-972X",
publisher = "Oxford University Press",
number = "4",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Causal Associations in Type 2 Diabetes Development

AU - Marott, Sarah C W

AU - Nordestgaard, Børge G

AU - Tybjærg-Hansen, Anne

AU - Benn, Marianne

N1 - Copyright © 2019 Endocrine Society.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - CONTEXT: Obesity, glucose, insulin resistance [homeostatic model assessment, version 2, for insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR)], and insulin secretion (HOMA2-β) have been associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) observationally. However, the causal, genetic contribution of each parameter to this risk is largely unknown and important to study because observational data are prone to confounding but genetic, causal data are free of confounding and reverse causation.OBJECTIVE: We examined the causal, genetic contribution of body mass index (BMI), glucose level, C-peptide level, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-β to the risk of T2D in 95,540 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and estimated the absolute 10-year risks.METHODS: Cox regression analysis, instrumental variable analysis, and Poisson regression analysis were performed to estimate the observational hazard ratios, causal, genetic ORs, and absolute 10-year risks of T2D.RESULTS: For 1-SD greater level, BMI was associated with an observational 66% (95% CI, 62% to 72%) and causal, genetic 121% (95% CI, 25% to 291%) greater risk of T2D; glucose with an observational 44% (95% CI, 41% to 46%) and causal, genetic 183% (95% CI, 56% to 416%) greater risk of T2D; and HOMA2-IR with an observational 30% (95% CI, 18% to 44%) and causal, genetic 12% (95% CI, 2% to 22%) greater risk of T2D. In contrast, for 1-SD greater level, HOMA2-β was associated with an observational 14% (95% CI, 11% to 16%) and causal, genetic 21% (95% CI, 8% to 32%) lower risk of T2D. The upper tertiles of HOMA2-IR were associated with absolute 10-year diabetes risks of 31% and 37% in obese women and men, age >60 years, and a glucose level of 6.1 to 11.0 mmol/L.CONCLUSIONS: BMI, glucose level, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-β are causally associated with T2D.

AB - CONTEXT: Obesity, glucose, insulin resistance [homeostatic model assessment, version 2, for insulin resistance (HOMA2-IR)], and insulin secretion (HOMA2-β) have been associated with type 2 diabetes (T2D) observationally. However, the causal, genetic contribution of each parameter to this risk is largely unknown and important to study because observational data are prone to confounding but genetic, causal data are free of confounding and reverse causation.OBJECTIVE: We examined the causal, genetic contribution of body mass index (BMI), glucose level, C-peptide level, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-β to the risk of T2D in 95,540 individuals from the Copenhagen General Population Study and estimated the absolute 10-year risks.METHODS: Cox regression analysis, instrumental variable analysis, and Poisson regression analysis were performed to estimate the observational hazard ratios, causal, genetic ORs, and absolute 10-year risks of T2D.RESULTS: For 1-SD greater level, BMI was associated with an observational 66% (95% CI, 62% to 72%) and causal, genetic 121% (95% CI, 25% to 291%) greater risk of T2D; glucose with an observational 44% (95% CI, 41% to 46%) and causal, genetic 183% (95% CI, 56% to 416%) greater risk of T2D; and HOMA2-IR with an observational 30% (95% CI, 18% to 44%) and causal, genetic 12% (95% CI, 2% to 22%) greater risk of T2D. In contrast, for 1-SD greater level, HOMA2-β was associated with an observational 14% (95% CI, 11% to 16%) and causal, genetic 21% (95% CI, 8% to 32%) lower risk of T2D. The upper tertiles of HOMA2-IR were associated with absolute 10-year diabetes risks of 31% and 37% in obese women and men, age >60 years, and a glucose level of 6.1 to 11.0 mmol/L.CONCLUSIONS: BMI, glucose level, HOMA2-IR, and HOMA2-β are causally associated with T2D.

U2 - 10.1210/jc.2018-01648

DO - 10.1210/jc.2018-01648

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30566658

VL - 104

SP - 1313

EP - 1324

JO - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

JF - Journal of Clinical Endocrinology and Metabolism

SN - 0021-972X

IS - 4

ER -

ID: 228976107