Can Plasma Volume Determination in Cirrhosis Be Replaced by an Algorithm Using Body Weight and Hematocrit?
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Can Plasma Volume Determination in Cirrhosis Be Replaced by an Algorithm Using Body Weight and Hematocrit? / Nørskov, Martine Prütz; Mønsted, Thormod; Kimer, Nina; Damgaard, Morten; Møller, Søren.
In: Diagnostics, Vol. 14, No. 8, 835, 2024.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Can Plasma Volume Determination in Cirrhosis Be Replaced by an Algorithm Using Body Weight and Hematocrit?
AU - Nørskov, Martine Prütz
AU - Mønsted, Thormod
AU - Kimer, Nina
AU - Damgaard, Morten
AU - Møller, Søren
N1 - Publisher Copyright: © 2024 by the authors.
PY - 2024
Y1 - 2024
N2 - Background: Patients with cirrhosis often develop hyperdynamic circulation with increased cardiac output, heart rate, and redistribution of the circulating volume with expanded plasma volume (PV). PV determination is part of the evaluation of patients with cirrhosis, but gold-standard methods are invasive, expensive, and time-consuming. Therefore, other estimations of PV would be preferable, and the aim of this study was therefore to study if PV, as assessed by a simplified algorithm based on hematocrit and weight, can replace the gold-standard method. Methods: We included 328 patients with cirrhosis who had their PV assessed by the indicator dilution technique as the gold-standard method (PVI-125). Actual PV was estimated as PVa = (1 − hematocrit)·(a + (b·body weight)). Ideal PV was estimated as PVi = c · body weight, where a, b, and c are constants. Results: PVI-125, PVa, and PVi were 3.99 ± 1.01, 3.09 ± 0.54, and 3.01 ± 0.65 (Mean ± SD), respectively. Although PVI-125 correlated significantly with PVa (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), a Bland–Altman plot revealed wide limits of confidence. Conclusions: The use of simplified algorithms does not sufficiently estimate PV and cannot replace the indicator dilution technique.
AB - Background: Patients with cirrhosis often develop hyperdynamic circulation with increased cardiac output, heart rate, and redistribution of the circulating volume with expanded plasma volume (PV). PV determination is part of the evaluation of patients with cirrhosis, but gold-standard methods are invasive, expensive, and time-consuming. Therefore, other estimations of PV would be preferable, and the aim of this study was therefore to study if PV, as assessed by a simplified algorithm based on hematocrit and weight, can replace the gold-standard method. Methods: We included 328 patients with cirrhosis who had their PV assessed by the indicator dilution technique as the gold-standard method (PVI-125). Actual PV was estimated as PVa = (1 − hematocrit)·(a + (b·body weight)). Ideal PV was estimated as PVi = c · body weight, where a, b, and c are constants. Results: PVI-125, PVa, and PVi were 3.99 ± 1.01, 3.09 ± 0.54, and 3.01 ± 0.65 (Mean ± SD), respectively. Although PVI-125 correlated significantly with PVa (r = 0.72, p < 0.001), a Bland–Altman plot revealed wide limits of confidence. Conclusions: The use of simplified algorithms does not sufficiently estimate PV and cannot replace the indicator dilution technique.
KW - calculated plasma volume
KW - cirrhosis
KW - plasma volume
KW - portal hypertension
U2 - 10.3390/diagnostics14080835
DO - 10.3390/diagnostics14080835
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 38667480
AN - SCOPUS:85191708528
VL - 14
JO - Diagnostics
JF - Diagnostics
SN - 2075-4418
IS - 8
M1 - 835
ER -
ID: 391211164