β-blocker adherence among patients with congenital Long QT Syndrome: a nationwide study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Documents

  • Fulltext

    Accepted author manuscript, 868 KB, PDF document

AIM: β-blockers are first line of treatment in patients with congenital Long QT Syndrome (cLQTS) (class-I or II recommendation) in order to prevent malignant arrhythmias. Hence, we examined long-term β-blocker adherence and associated risk factors among patients with cLQTS.

METHODS AND RESULTS: Danish patients with cLQTS claiming a prescription for any β-blocker after their cLQTS diagnosis were identified using data from nationwide registries and specialized inherited cardiac disease clinics (1995-2017). Patients were followed for up to five years. Treatment breaks >60 days were assessed (i.e. proxy for reduced adherence). Multivariable cox regression was used to identify risk factors associated with >60 days breaks in β-blocker treatment. Overall, 500 out of 633 (79%) patients with cLQTS claimed at least 1 prescription for any β-blocker after cLQTS diagnosis. During follow-up, 38.4% had a treatment break. Risk factors significantly associated with treatment breaks were implantable cardioverter defibrillator (ICD) (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.65, 95%confidence interval [CI]: 1.08-2.53), β-blocker side-effects (HR = 2.69, 95%CI: 1.75-4.13), and psychiatric disease (HR = 1.63, 95%CI: 1.04-2.57). By contrast, patients presenting with ventricular tachycardia/syncope as cLQTS disease manifestation were less likely to have a treatment break compared with asymptomatic patients (HR = 0.55, 95%CI: 0.33-0.82).

CONCLUSION: Reduced β-blocker adherence was common with more than a third of patients having a treatment break >60 days after cLQTS diagnosis. Patients with psychiatric disease, self-reported β-blocker side-effects, and ICD were more likely to display reduced adherence whereas a severe cLQTS disease manifestation was associated with optimal β-blocker adherence.

Original languageEnglish
JournalEuropean heart journal. Quality of care & clinical outcomes
Volume9
Issue number1
Pages (from-to)76–84
ISSN2058-1742
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2023

Bibliographical note

© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology.

Number of downloads are based on statistics from Google Scholar and www.ku.dk


No data available

ID: 304182583