Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure : a prospective controlled cohort study. / Saxtorph, Malene Hviid; Hallager, Trine; Persson, Gry; Petersen, Kathrine Birch; Eriksen, Jens Ole; Larsen, Lise Grupe; Hviid, Thomas Vauvert; Macklon, Nick.

In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online, Vol. 41, No. 6, 2020, p. 998-1006.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Saxtorph, MH, Hallager, T, Persson, G, Petersen, KB, Eriksen, JO, Larsen, LG, Hviid, TV & Macklon, N 2020, 'Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study', Reproductive BioMedicine Online, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.015

APA

Saxtorph, M. H., Hallager, T., Persson, G., Petersen, K. B., Eriksen, J. O., Larsen, L. G., Hviid, T. V., & Macklon, N. (2020). Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online, 41(6), 998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.015

Vancouver

Saxtorph MH, Hallager T, Persson G, Petersen KB, Eriksen JO, Larsen LG et al. Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2020;41(6):998-1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.015

Author

Saxtorph, Malene Hviid ; Hallager, Trine ; Persson, Gry ; Petersen, Kathrine Birch ; Eriksen, Jens Ole ; Larsen, Lise Grupe ; Hviid, Thomas Vauvert ; Macklon, Nick. / Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure : a prospective controlled cohort study. In: Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2020 ; Vol. 41, No. 6. pp. 998-1006.

Bibtex

@article{3ea2073cbf5245a39645fb8592a952ec,
title = "Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure: a prospective controlled cohort study",
abstract = "Research question: What is the prevalence of disrupted markers of endometrial function among women experiencing recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and does the prevalence differ from a control cohort? Design: Prospective controlled cohort study. In total, 86 women with a history of RIF and 37 women starting their first fertility treatment were recruited for this study. Endometrial and blood profiling were carried out in a hormone-substituted cycle using oestradiol and progesterone. Endometrial biopsies were analysed by histology, immune cell profiling, and the endometrial receptivity array (ERA{\textregistered}) test (Igenomix, Valencia, Spain). The vaginal microbiome was analysed using a NGS-based technology (ArtPRED, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Blood tests included oestradiol, progesterone, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin D and anti-phospholipid antibody levels. Results: Patients who had experienced RIF produced a range of test abnormalities. Compared with controls, women with RIF had a higher prevalence of chronic endometritis (24% versus 6%), a lower vitamin D level and a borderline lower progesterone level. Women who had experienced RIF had a more favourable vaginal microbiome compared with controls. Although the RIF cohort was older than the controls (mean age 33.8 years versus 30.2 years), no differences between the groups were observed in immune cell profiling and the ERA test. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that a single test or treatment for the endometrial factor in RIF is unlikely to be clinically effective. Diagnosing the endometrium in women with RIF permits targeted rather than blind interventions. Relative vitamin D deficiency, lower mid-luteal progesterone and chronic endometritis are ready targets for treatment. Understanding the role and treatment of an unfavourable vaginal microbiome in RIF needs further investigation.",
keywords = "Chronic endometritis, Endometrial receptivity, Luteal phase, Recurrent implantation failure, Vaginal microbiome",
author = "Saxtorph, {Malene Hviid} and Trine Hallager and Gry Persson and Petersen, {Kathrine Birch} and Eriksen, {Jens Ole} and Larsen, {Lise Grupe} and Hviid, {Thomas Vauvert} and Nick Macklon",
year = "2020",
doi = "10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.015",
language = "English",
volume = "41",
pages = "998--1006",
journal = "Reproductive BioMedicine Online",
issn = "1472-6483",
publisher = "Elsevier",
number = "6",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - Assessing endometrial receptivity after recurrent implantation failure

T2 - a prospective controlled cohort study

AU - Saxtorph, Malene Hviid

AU - Hallager, Trine

AU - Persson, Gry

AU - Petersen, Kathrine Birch

AU - Eriksen, Jens Ole

AU - Larsen, Lise Grupe

AU - Hviid, Thomas Vauvert

AU - Macklon, Nick

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - Research question: What is the prevalence of disrupted markers of endometrial function among women experiencing recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and does the prevalence differ from a control cohort? Design: Prospective controlled cohort study. In total, 86 women with a history of RIF and 37 women starting their first fertility treatment were recruited for this study. Endometrial and blood profiling were carried out in a hormone-substituted cycle using oestradiol and progesterone. Endometrial biopsies were analysed by histology, immune cell profiling, and the endometrial receptivity array (ERA®) test (Igenomix, Valencia, Spain). The vaginal microbiome was analysed using a NGS-based technology (ArtPRED, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Blood tests included oestradiol, progesterone, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin D and anti-phospholipid antibody levels. Results: Patients who had experienced RIF produced a range of test abnormalities. Compared with controls, women with RIF had a higher prevalence of chronic endometritis (24% versus 6%), a lower vitamin D level and a borderline lower progesterone level. Women who had experienced RIF had a more favourable vaginal microbiome compared with controls. Although the RIF cohort was older than the controls (mean age 33.8 years versus 30.2 years), no differences between the groups were observed in immune cell profiling and the ERA test. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that a single test or treatment for the endometrial factor in RIF is unlikely to be clinically effective. Diagnosing the endometrium in women with RIF permits targeted rather than blind interventions. Relative vitamin D deficiency, lower mid-luteal progesterone and chronic endometritis are ready targets for treatment. Understanding the role and treatment of an unfavourable vaginal microbiome in RIF needs further investigation.

AB - Research question: What is the prevalence of disrupted markers of endometrial function among women experiencing recurrent implantation failure (RIF), and does the prevalence differ from a control cohort? Design: Prospective controlled cohort study. In total, 86 women with a history of RIF and 37 women starting their first fertility treatment were recruited for this study. Endometrial and blood profiling were carried out in a hormone-substituted cycle using oestradiol and progesterone. Endometrial biopsies were analysed by histology, immune cell profiling, and the endometrial receptivity array (ERA®) test (Igenomix, Valencia, Spain). The vaginal microbiome was analysed using a NGS-based technology (ArtPRED, Amsterdam, the Netherlands). Blood tests included oestradiol, progesterone, prolactin, thyroid-stimulating hormone, vitamin D and anti-phospholipid antibody levels. Results: Patients who had experienced RIF produced a range of test abnormalities. Compared with controls, women with RIF had a higher prevalence of chronic endometritis (24% versus 6%), a lower vitamin D level and a borderline lower progesterone level. Women who had experienced RIF had a more favourable vaginal microbiome compared with controls. Although the RIF cohort was older than the controls (mean age 33.8 years versus 30.2 years), no differences between the groups were observed in immune cell profiling and the ERA test. Conclusion: These data demonstrate that a single test or treatment for the endometrial factor in RIF is unlikely to be clinically effective. Diagnosing the endometrium in women with RIF permits targeted rather than blind interventions. Relative vitamin D deficiency, lower mid-luteal progesterone and chronic endometritis are ready targets for treatment. Understanding the role and treatment of an unfavourable vaginal microbiome in RIF needs further investigation.

KW - Chronic endometritis

KW - Endometrial receptivity

KW - Luteal phase

KW - Recurrent implantation failure

KW - Vaginal microbiome

U2 - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.015

DO - 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.08.015

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 32978074

AN - SCOPUS:85091514061

VL - 41

SP - 998

EP - 1006

JO - Reproductive BioMedicine Online

JF - Reproductive BioMedicine Online

SN - 1472-6483

IS - 6

ER -

ID: 249389311