Adductor Canal Block With Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses and Morphine Consumption: A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial
Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Standard
Adductor Canal Block With Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses and Morphine Consumption : A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial. / Jaeger, Pia; Baggesgaard, Jonas; Sørensen, Johan K; Ilfeld, Brian M; Gottschau, Bo; Graungaard, Ben; Dahl, Jørgen; Odgaard, Anders; Grevstad, Ulrik.
In: Anesthesia and Analgesia, Vol. 126, No. 6, 2018, p. 2069-2077.Research output: Contribution to journal › Journal article › Research › peer-review
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Adductor Canal Block With Continuous Infusion Versus Intermittent Boluses and Morphine Consumption
T2 - A Randomized, Blinded, Controlled Clinical Trial
AU - Jaeger, Pia
AU - Baggesgaard, Jonas
AU - Sørensen, Johan K
AU - Ilfeld, Brian M
AU - Gottschau, Bo
AU - Graungaard, Ben
AU - Dahl, Jørgen
AU - Odgaard, Anders
AU - Grevstad, Ulrik
PY - 2018
Y1 - 2018
N2 - BACKGROUND: Based on the assumption that relatively large volumes of local anesthetic optimize an adductor canal block (ACB), we theorized that an ACB administered as repeated boluses would improve analgesia without compromising mobility, compared with a continuous infusion.METHODS: We performed a randomized, blinded, controlled study, including patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. Patients received 0.2% ropivacaine via a catheter in the adductor canal administered as either repeated intermittent boluses (21 mL/3 h) or continuous infusion (7 mL/h). The primary outcome was total (postoperative day [POD], 0-2) opioid consumption (mg), administered as patient-controlled analgesia. Pain, ambulation, and quadriceps muscle strength were secondary outcomes.RESULTS: We randomized 110 patients, of whom 107 were analyzed. Total opioid consumption (POD, 0-2) was a median (range) of 23 mg (0-139) in the bolus group and 26 mg (3-120) in the infusion group (estimated median difference, 4 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13 to 5; P = .29). Linear mixed-model analyses revealed no difference in pain during knee flexion (mean difference, 2.6 mm; 95% CI, -2.9 to 8.0) or at rest (mean difference, 1.7 mm; 95% CI, -1.5 to 4.9). Patients in the bolus group had improved quadriceps sparing on POD 2 (median difference, 7.4%; 95% CI, 0.5%-15.5%). However, this difference was not present on POD 1 or reflected in the ambulation tests (P > .05).CONCLUSIONS: Changing the mode of administration for an ACB from continuous infusion to repeated intermittent boluses did not decrease opioid consumption, pain, nor mobility.
AB - BACKGROUND: Based on the assumption that relatively large volumes of local anesthetic optimize an adductor canal block (ACB), we theorized that an ACB administered as repeated boluses would improve analgesia without compromising mobility, compared with a continuous infusion.METHODS: We performed a randomized, blinded, controlled study, including patients scheduled for total knee arthroplasty with spinal anesthesia. Patients received 0.2% ropivacaine via a catheter in the adductor canal administered as either repeated intermittent boluses (21 mL/3 h) or continuous infusion (7 mL/h). The primary outcome was total (postoperative day [POD], 0-2) opioid consumption (mg), administered as patient-controlled analgesia. Pain, ambulation, and quadriceps muscle strength were secondary outcomes.RESULTS: We randomized 110 patients, of whom 107 were analyzed. Total opioid consumption (POD, 0-2) was a median (range) of 23 mg (0-139) in the bolus group and 26 mg (3-120) in the infusion group (estimated median difference, 4 mg; 95% confidence interval [CI], -13 to 5; P = .29). Linear mixed-model analyses revealed no difference in pain during knee flexion (mean difference, 2.6 mm; 95% CI, -2.9 to 8.0) or at rest (mean difference, 1.7 mm; 95% CI, -1.5 to 4.9). Patients in the bolus group had improved quadriceps sparing on POD 2 (median difference, 7.4%; 95% CI, 0.5%-15.5%). However, this difference was not present on POD 1 or reflected in the ambulation tests (P > .05).CONCLUSIONS: Changing the mode of administration for an ACB from continuous infusion to repeated intermittent boluses did not decrease opioid consumption, pain, nor mobility.
U2 - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002747
DO - 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002747
M3 - Journal article
C2 - 29293181
VL - 126
SP - 2069
EP - 2077
JO - Anesthesia and Analgesia
JF - Anesthesia and Analgesia
SN - 0003-2999
IS - 6
ER -
ID: 215462316