A world-wide study on delirium assessments and presence of protocols

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

  • Peter Nydahl
  • Keibun Liu
  • Giuseppe Bellelli
  • Julie Benbenishty
  • Mark van den Boogaard
  • Gideon Caplan
  • Chi Ryang Chung
  • Muhammed Elhadi
  • Mohan Gurjar
  • Gabi Heras-La Calle
  • Magdalena Hoffmann
  • Marie Madlen Jeitziner
  • Karla Krewulak
  • Tanya Mailhot
  • Alessandro Morandi
  • Ricardo Kenji Nawa
  • Esther S. Oh
  • Collet, Marie Oxenbøll
  • Maria Carolina Paulino
  • Heidi Lindroth
  • Rebecca von Haken
  • WDAD Study Group

BACKGROUND: Delirium is a common complication of older people in hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. OBJECTIVE: To assess the worldwide use of validated delirium assessment tools and the presence of delirium management protocols. DESIGN: Secondary analysis of a worldwide one-day point prevalence study on World Delirium Awareness Day, 15 March 2023. SETTING: Cross-sectional online survey including hospitals, rehabilitation and long-term facilities. METHODS: Participating clinicians reported data on delirium, the presence of protocols, delirium assessments, delirium-awareness interventions, non-pharmacological and pharmacological interventions, and ward/unit-specific barriers. RESULTS: Data from 44 countries, 1664 wards/units and 36 048 patients were analysed. Validated delirium assessments were used in 66.7% (n = 1110) of wards/units, 18.6% (n = 310) used personal judgement or no assessment, and 10% (n = 166) used other assessment methods. A delirium management protocol was reported in 66.8% (n = 1094) of wards/units. The presence of protocols for delirium management varied across continents, ranging from 21.6% (on 21/97 wards/units) in Africa to 90.4% (235/260) in Australia, similar to the use of validated delirium assessments with 29.6% (29/98) in Africa to 93.5% (116/124) in North America. Wards/units with a delirium management protocol [n = 1094/1664, 66.8%] were more likely to use a validated delirium test than those without a protocol [odds ratio 6.97 (95% confidence interval 5.289-9.185)]. The presence of a delirium protocol increased the chances for valid delirium assessment and, likely, evidence-based interventions. CONCLUSION: Wards/units that reported the presence of delirium management protocols had a higher probability of using validated delirium assessments tools to assess for delirium.

Original languageEnglish
Article numberafae129
JournalAge and Ageing
Volume53
Issue number7
Number of pages9
ISSN0002-0729
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2024

Bibliographical note

Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Geriatrics Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

    Research areas

  • assessments, delirium, encephalopathy, older people, patient safety, protocols, quality improvement

ID: 398465352