A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Standard

A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training. / Thinggaard, Ebbe; Bjerrum, Flemming; Strandbygaard, Jeanette; Konge, Lars; Gögenur, Ismail.

In: Danish Medical Journal, Vol. 66, No. 1, A5525, 2019.

Research output: Contribution to journalJournal articleResearchpeer-review

Harvard

Thinggaard, E, Bjerrum, F, Strandbygaard, J, Konge, L & Gögenur, I 2019, 'A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training', Danish Medical Journal, vol. 66, no. 1, A5525. <https://ugeskriftet.dk/dmj/randomised-clinical-trial-take-home-laparoscopic-training>

APA

Thinggaard, E., Bjerrum, F., Strandbygaard, J., Konge, L., & Gögenur, I. (2019). A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training. Danish Medical Journal, 66(1), [A5525]. https://ugeskriftet.dk/dmj/randomised-clinical-trial-take-home-laparoscopic-training

Vancouver

Thinggaard E, Bjerrum F, Strandbygaard J, Konge L, Gögenur I. A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training. Danish Medical Journal. 2019;66(1). A5525.

Author

Thinggaard, Ebbe ; Bjerrum, Flemming ; Strandbygaard, Jeanette ; Konge, Lars ; Gögenur, Ismail. / A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training. In: Danish Medical Journal. 2019 ; Vol. 66, No. 1.

Bibtex

@article{bce4dcb9175a49c4a3bad1c971f68cc3,
title = "A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training",
abstract = "INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training in surgery helps trainees master laparoscopic skills, and training at home on mobile box trainers may allow trainees to reach proficiency faster. The aim of this study was to examine the added effects of training at home.METHODS: Participants were trainees from departments of surgery, gynaecology and urology who were recruited while taking part in a laparoscopic training course. The interven-tion consisted of added access to a mobile box trainer allowing participants to train at home.RESULTS: During a one-year study period, 36 participants completed the trial. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of days it took to complete the course (86 days versus 89 days, p = 0.89) or in the final test scores of the two groups (493 versus 460, p = 0.07). A sig-nificant difference in the number of training sessions at-tended was found (5.8 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). Participants were able to reliably rate their own performance; the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86, p < 0.001.CONCLUSIONS: Trainees who had access to training at home did not pass a test earlier or achieve a higher score at the end of a course than trainees who had no such access. Improved access to training at home allowed for shorter and more frequent sessions; however, testing and mandatory training requirements apparently determine training patterns. Trainees were able to reliably rate their own performance.FUNDING: Equipment for the study was provided by the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was exempt from ethical approval according to Danish legislation (H-3-2014-FSP31). The trial protocol was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov prior to commencing the trial (NCT02243215).",
keywords = "Adult, Female, General Surgery/education, Gynecology/education, Humans, Internship and Residency, Laparoscopy/education, Male, Middle Aged, Simulation Training/methods, Time Factors, Urology/education",
author = "Ebbe Thinggaard and Flemming Bjerrum and Jeanette Strandbygaard and Lars Konge and Ismail G{\"o}genur",
note = "Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.",
year = "2019",
language = "English",
volume = "66",
journal = "Danish Medical Journal",
issn = "2245-1919",
publisher = "Almindelige Danske Laegeforening",
number = "1",

}

RIS

TY - JOUR

T1 - A randomised clinical trial of take-home laparoscopic training

AU - Thinggaard, Ebbe

AU - Bjerrum, Flemming

AU - Strandbygaard, Jeanette

AU - Konge, Lars

AU - Gögenur, Ismail

N1 - Articles published in the DMJ are “open access”. This means that the articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial License, which permits any non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

PY - 2019

Y1 - 2019

N2 - INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training in surgery helps trainees master laparoscopic skills, and training at home on mobile box trainers may allow trainees to reach proficiency faster. The aim of this study was to examine the added effects of training at home.METHODS: Participants were trainees from departments of surgery, gynaecology and urology who were recruited while taking part in a laparoscopic training course. The interven-tion consisted of added access to a mobile box trainer allowing participants to train at home.RESULTS: During a one-year study period, 36 participants completed the trial. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of days it took to complete the course (86 days versus 89 days, p = 0.89) or in the final test scores of the two groups (493 versus 460, p = 0.07). A sig-nificant difference in the number of training sessions at-tended was found (5.8 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). Participants were able to reliably rate their own performance; the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86, p < 0.001.CONCLUSIONS: Trainees who had access to training at home did not pass a test earlier or achieve a higher score at the end of a course than trainees who had no such access. Improved access to training at home allowed for shorter and more frequent sessions; however, testing and mandatory training requirements apparently determine training patterns. Trainees were able to reliably rate their own performance.FUNDING: Equipment for the study was provided by the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was exempt from ethical approval according to Danish legislation (H-3-2014-FSP31). The trial protocol was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov prior to commencing the trial (NCT02243215).

AB - INTRODUCTION: Simulation-based training in surgery helps trainees master laparoscopic skills, and training at home on mobile box trainers may allow trainees to reach proficiency faster. The aim of this study was to examine the added effects of training at home.METHODS: Participants were trainees from departments of surgery, gynaecology and urology who were recruited while taking part in a laparoscopic training course. The interven-tion consisted of added access to a mobile box trainer allowing participants to train at home.RESULTS: During a one-year study period, 36 participants completed the trial. There was no statistically significant difference in the number of days it took to complete the course (86 days versus 89 days, p = 0.89) or in the final test scores of the two groups (493 versus 460, p = 0.07). A sig-nificant difference in the number of training sessions at-tended was found (5.8 versus 2.3, p < 0.001). Participants were able to reliably rate their own performance; the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.86, p < 0.001.CONCLUSIONS: Trainees who had access to training at home did not pass a test earlier or achieve a higher score at the end of a course than trainees who had no such access. Improved access to training at home allowed for shorter and more frequent sessions; however, testing and mandatory training requirements apparently determine training patterns. Trainees were able to reliably rate their own performance.FUNDING: Equipment for the study was provided by the Copenhagen Academy for Medical Education and Simulation, Capital Region of Denmark, Copenhagen, Denmark.TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study was exempt from ethical approval according to Danish legislation (H-3-2014-FSP31). The trial protocol was registered with www.clinicaltrials.gov prior to commencing the trial (NCT02243215).

KW - Adult

KW - Female

KW - General Surgery/education

KW - Gynecology/education

KW - Humans

KW - Internship and Residency

KW - Laparoscopy/education

KW - Male

KW - Middle Aged

KW - Simulation Training/methods

KW - Time Factors

KW - Urology/education

M3 - Journal article

C2 - 30573006

VL - 66

JO - Danish Medical Journal

JF - Danish Medical Journal

SN - 2245-1919

IS - 1

M1 - A5525

ER -

ID: 236013407