What’s in a Right? Concretizing States’ Climate Change Mitigation Obligations under Human Rights Law
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
What’s in a Right? Concretizing States’ Climate Change Mitigation Obligations under Human Rights Law. / Nordlander, Linnéa.
I: Human Rights Law Review, Bind 24, Nr. 1, ngae001, 01.03.2024.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - What’s in a Right? Concretizing States’ Climate Change Mitigation Obligations under Human Rights Law
AU - Nordlander, Linnéa
N1 - Funding Information: The author acknowledges support from the Independent Research Fund Denmark (project: Enhancing Climate Action through International Law). The author would also like to extend thanks to the participants in the workshop ‘Climate and Investment Litigation’ hosted at University College London on the 2nd of February 2023 and to members of the Norwegian Institute for Human Rights for their useful feedback on an early draft of this article. Publisher Copyright: © The Author(s) [2024].
PY - 2024/3/1
Y1 - 2024/3/1
N2 - States owe duties under human rights law to protect individuals from climate harm by mitigating climate change individually and collectively, in order to secure the Paris Agreement’s 1.5◦C goal. It is, however, unclear what human rights law requires of states generally in terms of emissions reduction trajectories. This article elucidates that question, by looking at what reduction obligations can be deduced from scholarship and the work of human rights enforcement mandates. It argues that it is not possible to deduce individualized reduction obligations or methods to calculate such obligations from the current body of human rights law. The article then explores three different pathways to achieve such concretization: law-making, litigation, and monitoring bodies. The analysis provides a platform for human rights law to realize its potential in advancing state ambition on mitigating climate change at the norm-level by assessing the promise of the different pathways to concretization.
AB - States owe duties under human rights law to protect individuals from climate harm by mitigating climate change individually and collectively, in order to secure the Paris Agreement’s 1.5◦C goal. It is, however, unclear what human rights law requires of states generally in terms of emissions reduction trajectories. This article elucidates that question, by looking at what reduction obligations can be deduced from scholarship and the work of human rights enforcement mandates. It argues that it is not possible to deduce individualized reduction obligations or methods to calculate such obligations from the current body of human rights law. The article then explores three different pathways to achieve such concretization: law-making, litigation, and monitoring bodies. The analysis provides a platform for human rights law to realize its potential in advancing state ambition on mitigating climate change at the norm-level by assessing the promise of the different pathways to concretization.
KW - climate change
KW - emissions reductions
KW - European Convention of Human Rights
KW - human rights
KW - international law
KW - mitigation
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85184491952&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1093/hrlr/ngae001
DO - 10.1093/hrlr/ngae001
M3 - Journal article
AN - SCOPUS:85184491952
VL - 24
JO - Human Rights Law Review
JF - Human Rights Law Review
SN - 1461-7781
IS - 1
M1 - ngae001
ER -
ID: 388587325