Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei?
Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Standard
Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei? / Broberg, Morten; Fenger, Niels.
I: Revista Romana de Drept European, Nr. 3, 2013, s. 121-136.Publikation: Bidrag til tidsskrift › Tidsskriftartikel › Forskning › fagfællebedømt
Harvard
APA
Vancouver
Author
Bibtex
}
RIS
TY - JOUR
T1 - Variaţii privind trimiterile preliminare la Curtea de Justiţie provenite din statele membre – Sunt factorii structurali (parte a) explicaţiei?
AU - Broberg, Morten
AU - Fenger, Niels
PY - 2013
Y1 - 2013
N2 - The preliminary reference procedure in Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which enables national courts to request the Court of Justice to provide a ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act, is widely considered to be the jewel in the crown of EU law. When considering the number of references from different Member States, it will become immediately apparent that there are considerable variations. This article examines to what extent these variations may be explained by three structural factors, namely (1) population size, (2) willingness to litigate, and (3) Member State compliance with EU law. It is concluded that some - but not all - of the variations in number of references from Member State judiciaries may be attributed to structural factors rather than being merely a reflection of different Member State courts’ willingness to make use of Article 267 TFEU on such references (the so-called behavioural factors).
AB - The preliminary reference procedure in Article 267 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU), which enables national courts to request the Court of Justice to provide a ruling on the interpretation or validity of an EU legal act, is widely considered to be the jewel in the crown of EU law. When considering the number of references from different Member States, it will become immediately apparent that there are considerable variations. This article examines to what extent these variations may be explained by three structural factors, namely (1) population size, (2) willingness to litigate, and (3) Member State compliance with EU law. It is concluded that some - but not all - of the variations in number of references from Member State judiciaries may be attributed to structural factors rather than being merely a reflection of different Member State courts’ willingness to make use of Article 267 TFEU on such references (the so-called behavioural factors).
M3 - Tidsskriftartikel
SP - 121
EP - 136
JO - Revista Romana de Drept European
JF - Revista Romana de Drept European
SN - 2068-8083
IS - 3
ER -
ID: 50915025